On Oct 7, 7:34 pm, Jan Drew  wrote:
> On Oct 4, 7:09 pm, PeterB  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 1:13 pm, Happy Oyster  wrote:
>
> > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:48:21 -0700 (PDT), PeterB  wrote:
> > > >On Oct 2, 2:01 pm, Happy Oyster  wrote:
>
> > > >> There is no "alternative medicine". Either something works, then it
> > > >> is integrated into scientific medicine, or it does not work, then it is
> > > >> crap and no medicine.
>
> > > >Correct, there is no "alternative" medicine because the human body has
> > > >evolved to beneficially metabolize only nutrients in order to maintain
> > > >homeostasis. Drugs are therefore a false "alternative," "scientific"
> > > >only in the sense that they are tested for short-term toxicity in
> > > >relatively small group of subjects, usually for just 3 mths. This is
> > > >how Vioxx came to kill so many, and why so many drugs are either
> > > >recalled, relabeled, or both. If you don't believe me, just look at
> > > >Poison Control reports and compare the number of hospitalizations
> > > >resulting from use of prescription drugs to those from use of vitamin
> > > >or herbal supplements. It's not even close.
>
> > > Wow, what a bloody bullshit.
>
> > > Just look at the first sentence:
>
> > > >Correct, there is no "alternative" medicine because the human body has
> > > >evolved to beneficially metabolize only nutrients in order to maintain
> > > >homeostasis.
>
> > > If that were tre, then a human body never could be poisoned.
>
> > No, idiot, that is not the conclusion to be drawn, except in your
> > water-logged brain.
>
> LOL!!  Go Peter, GO!

;-)

> <snip taking the Lord's name in vain>