On Apr 15, 7:12 pm, Peter Bowditch  wrote:
>
> >> > > > Please cite the court order showing where I lost. Remember, it has to
> >> > > > be the final order in the case.
>
> >> > > The Pontificating Blowhard will never do that. He is all Blow, and no
> >> > > Show.
>
> >> > So, defend your fellow pharmbot by posting the court document.  The
> >> > reason you will not do that is because you *cannot* do so without
> >> > proving his guilt, which is already an established fact.
>
> >> You made the charge, YOU prove it.
>
> >No, the plaintiff in the lawsuit made the charge, I simply observed
> >that Peter Bowditch is a proven liar, as anyone can learn by googling
> >the appropriate court documents using his name.
>
> Making a charge and proving it in court are two different things. As
> orders of the Federal Court of Australia are not available to Google
> for indexing, perhaps you need to search somewhere else. I suggest
> starting athttps://www.comcourts.gov.au/public/esearch/disclaimer

You seem to forget we had this conversation several years ago, when I
looked into the matter and posted my comments to mha.  Consistent with
your behaviour in the newsgroups, the Australian court's disposition
on your public misrepresentation of the plaintiff's business was a
reminder that your gift for disinformation is obviously vocational.
That your reciprocal litigation was not resolved by final ruling does
not change the fact you were warned to disengage from further public
statements in the matter except for the requirement that you post a
disclaimer regarding your specious claims.  Just reading a collection
of your "commentaries" to the newsgroups, however, is sufficient to
know that you lack intellectual honesty or a shred of credibility
while shilling for industry.  Case closed.