|
|
|
date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:57:30 +0000,
group: uk.people.disability
back
Should we believe in coincidence?
Could the disabled now be the target of a government hate
campaign?
Gordon Brown made a "surprise" visit to Real Radio last
week. On a radio station which plays music, they threw
the Breakfast Show aside to allow the Labour Leader (and
un-elected Prime Minister) to do a phone-in. It would
seem that the station owners (GMG) are taking sides.
Anyhow, one of the questions was about the disabled. The
caller suggested that disabled people were not really
disabled, just spongers. Someone she knew was on
disability but, according to her, was fitter than her.
Clearly, far too many people have a very narrow view of
disabiliies. If they don't see a wheelchair or white stick,
they believe that a person is perfectly fit. They do not
seem to get the concept of hidden disabilities, which can
be as severe as visible ones.
But this seems far too perfect for a PM who has destroyed
the economy and now wants to take money from the disabled.
Labour have previously been exposed as using stooges to
ask the questions that they want to answer or to appear
to meet the PM, fake letters in local papers "letters"
pages and using renta-mobs to create disturbances at
opposition events (like the recent disturbance at BBC).
The radio station stated that the PM turned up in secrecy,
nobody could know in advance. Could they really get a
phone-in to run perfectly, with well worded questions and
answers, when nobody knew in advance? Short notice, with
just one question to ask, does a person ask the PM what
he is going to do about one local "sponger", or does
this seem a little too much like a scripted question time
with stooges?
Through such tactics and advertising campaigns "targeting
benefit fraud", they made the public hate the unemployed
to the point where employers refuse to employ them. Are
the disabled now the target of such a hate campaign, so
that the government can throw them off the benefit that
they rely on to live as best they can?
Best regards,
Peter.
date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:57:30 +0000
author: Bandwidth @radiouk.com
|
Re: Should we believe in coincidence?
At least 20 knew he would be on air - secretaries, security, himself etc etc
etc
--
Regards
John & Victoria
Our Blog: http://victoriaandjohn.blogspot.com/
"Bandwidth" <@radiouk.com> wrote in message
news:4AE68BCA.FC35A462@radiouk.com...
> Could the disabled now be the target of a government hate
> campaign?
>
> Gordon Brown made a "surprise" visit to Real Radio last
> week. On a radio station which plays music, they threw
> the Breakfast Show aside to allow the Labour Leader (and
> un-elected Prime Minister) to do a phone-in. It would
> seem that the station owners (GMG) are taking sides.
>
> Anyhow, one of the questions was about the disabled. The
> caller suggested that disabled people were not really
> disabled, just spongers. Someone she knew was on
> disability but, according to her, was fitter than her.
> Clearly, far too many people have a very narrow view of
> disabiliies. If they don't see a wheelchair or white stick,
> they believe that a person is perfectly fit. They do not
> seem to get the concept of hidden disabilities, which can
> be as severe as visible ones.
> But this seems far too perfect for a PM who has destroyed
> the economy and now wants to take money from the disabled.
>
> Labour have previously been exposed as using stooges to
> ask the questions that they want to answer or to appear
> to meet the PM, fake letters in local papers "letters"
> pages and using renta-mobs to create disturbances at
> opposition events (like the recent disturbance at BBC).
>
> The radio station stated that the PM turned up in secrecy,
> nobody could know in advance. Could they really get a
> phone-in to run perfectly, with well worded questions and
> answers, when nobody knew in advance? Short notice, with
> just one question to ask, does a person ask the PM what
> he is going to do about one local "sponger", or does
> this seem a little too much like a scripted question time
> with stooges?
>
> Through such tactics and advertising campaigns "targeting
> benefit fraud", they made the public hate the unemployed
> to the point where employers refuse to employ them. Are
> the disabled now the target of such a hate campaign, so
> that the government can throw them off the benefit that
> they rely on to live as best they can?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Peter.
date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:01:48 -0000
author: John Hopkins
|
Re: Should we believe in coincidence?
On 27 Oct, 05:57, Bandwidth <@radiouk.com> wrote:
> Could the disabled now be the target of a government hate
> campaign?
>
> Gordon Brown made a "surprise" visit to Real Radio last
> week. On a radio station which plays music, they threw
> the Breakfast Show aside to allow the Labour Leader (and
> un-elected Prime Minister) to do a phone-in. It would
> seem that the station owners (GMG) are taking sides.
>
> Anyhow, one of the questions was about the disabled. The
> caller suggested that disabled people were not really
> disabled, just spongers. Someone she knew was on
> disability but, according to her, was fitter than her.
> Clearly, far too many people have a very narrow view of
> disabiliies. <snipped>
>
> Best regards,
> Peter.
Its not just the able bodied who have that attitude. I've had disabled
people tell me there's nothing wrong with me far more than able bodied
have ever done.
Generally when I nick the last disabled space or when they see me
putting the shopping in the car with my walking stick in plain sight
next to me.
Martin <><
date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
|
|