Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
local
ayrshire
bath
bedfordshire
birmingham
borders-region
bristol
channel-isles
cheshire
cornwall
county-durham
cumbria
derbyshire
devon
east-anglia
essx
geordie
glasgow
hampshire
herefordshire
hertfordshire
isle-of-wight
kent
lincolnshire
london
london.info
lothians
merseyside
midlands
north-staffs
north-wales
nw-england
peterborough
scot-highlands
shropshire
somerset
south-wales
southwest
southwest.adverts
surrey
teesside
thames-valley
warwickshire
west-wales
yorkshire
yorkshire.noticeboard
  
 
date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:44:59 +0100,    group: uk.local.yorkshire        back       
WE The People   
One's Will is an expression of Sovereignty, ie: the ultimate authority to 
make and impose laws.

The Will of We the People is only inferior to the Will of God...Theocracy 
being superior to Democracy.

The Will of the People prevails over Public Servants, eg: Parliaments, 
Judges, Registrars, Police, etc., who are servants of the People.

The Courts are the People's Court, ie: where People administer Justice by 12 
of the People congregating as Jurors (deliverers of Common Law), who ask "So 
help me God" to be able to do right.

People can only be judged by their equals gathered together as Juries.

Common Law is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People and 
overrules Statute Law which only made by Parliaments, ie: by the servants of 
the People.

People hold their servants accountable and judge them according to Common 
Law.

Judges can judge themselves and other creations of Parliament, ie: of that 
third level of Jurisdiction (Bureaucracy), according to Statute Law.

Judges do not judge We the People.

"We" is you and I.

As individuals, We the People can consent to allow a Summary procedure, ie: 
without a Jury, but that consent must be clear and unequivocal.

Servants of the People cannot disobey the Will of the People.

The Referendum of 1988 was a ploy to trick the People into surrendering 
their Will, ie: it was an attempt to have the People surrender their 
Sovereignty by allowing Judges to judge People for Contempt of Court and for 
Military Officers to judge us in matters of Martial Law.  Fortunately, that 
proposed alertation to the Australian Constitution was defeated at the Polls 
by an overwhelmiong majority.  However, the Australian Judiciary have 
disregarded the Will of the People...which is nothing less than Treason.

Public Servants cannot stop the People taking their disputes and causes to 
Court. Should a Registrar or Judge, ie: an Officer of the Court, reject the 
filing an action brought by any of the People, you or I simply say, "It is 
my Will that it be filed.". Should the Public Servant still disobey, then a 
Grand Jury is assembled to indict that offender to be tried in the People's 
Court by a Petit/Trial Jury for Contempt of Court - which is the offence of 
interferring with the administration of Justice where Justice is "the 
protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs".

Never forget Sui Juris.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

---------------------

Crown protected judicial crime.

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com

http://www.masonsatwork.50megs.com

http://www.mauricekellett.com
date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:44:59 +0100   author:   Maurice Kellett

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us