|
|
|
date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:36:03 +0100,
group: uk.local.warwickshire
back
Warwickshire Greenbelt
I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism associated with
protests over new housing, but the threat to greenbelt land, which often are
important wildlife corridors, is increasing due to pressure from developers.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
--
Chris H,
He's predictable, but that's to be expected.
Please remove the numbers to reply
date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:36:03 +0100
author: Chris H
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
"Chris H" wrote in message
news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism associated with
>protests over new housing, but the threat to greenbelt land, which often
>are important wildlife corridors, is increasing due to pressure from
>developers.
>
> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>
> --
> Chris H,
> He's predictable, but that's to be expected.
> Please remove the numbers to reply
>
Thanks for posting this Chris, it's a pet subject of mine. I'll reply
properly tomorrow with my thoughts on it, which are basically, stop
concreting over our countryside.
date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:32:06 +0100
author: Road_Hog
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
"Chris H" wrote in message
news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism associated with
>protests over new housing, but the threat to greenbelt land, which often
>are important wildlife corridors, is increasing due to pressure from
>developers.
>
> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>
Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the woods -
you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are loads of brownfield
sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without destroying
the countryside?
ally
date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:36:48 +0100
author: a l l y
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
"a l l y" wrote:
>"Chris H" wrote in message
>news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>>I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism associated with
>>protests over new housing, but the threat to greenbelt land, which often
>>are important wildlife corridors, is increasing due to pressure from
>>developers.
>>
>> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>>
>Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the woods -
>you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are loads of brownfield
>sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without destroying
>the countryside?
>
Apart from a couple of cities, we're the only county without a
National Nature Reserve. Birmingham's got two, and Cumbria's
got two dozen or more.
--
Sleepalot aa #1385
date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:05:31 +0100
author: Sleepalot
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
"Sleepalot" wrote in message
news:gb9lc5li5o5nc4rt5f8cfv6oifds485pkd@4ax.com...
> "a l l y" wrote:
>
>>"Chris H" wrote in message
>>news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism associated with
>>>protests over new housing, but the threat to greenbelt land, which often
>>>are important wildlife corridors, is increasing due to pressure from
>>>developers.
>>>
>>> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>>>
>>Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the woods -
>>you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are loads of
>>brownfield
>>sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without
>>destroying
>>the countryside?
>>
> Apart from a couple of cities, we're the only county without a
> National Nature Reserve. Birmingham's got two, and Cumbria's
> got two dozen or more.
>
Is there anywhere in Warwickshire that you'd consider special enough to
designated as such?
ally
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:28:39 +0100
author: a l l y
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
a l l y wrote:
> "Sleepalot" wrote in message
> news:gb9lc5li5o5nc4rt5f8cfv6oifds485pkd@4ax.com...
>> "a l l y" wrote:
>>
>>> "Chris H" wrote in message
>>> news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism
>>>> associated with protests over new housing, but the threat to
>>>> greenbelt land, which often are important wildlife corridors, is
>>>> increasing due to pressure from developers.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>>>>
>>> Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the
>>> woods - you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are
>>> loads of brownfield
>>> sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without
>>> destroying
>>> the countryside?
>>>
>> Apart from a couple of cities, we're the only county without a
>> National Nature Reserve. Birmingham's got two, and Cumbria's
>> got two dozen or more.
>>
> Is there anywhere in Warwickshire that you'd consider special enough
> to designated as such?
My back garden! ;-)
We do have places like Charlecote Park and the like, but they are managed
estates, not wildlife reserves. There are lots of farms too. Off the top of
my head I couldn't name one sizable forest or wood or heath that could be a
wild habitat......and that pretty much rules out my back garden as well.
That's a shame because I could have sold the lawn mower on eBay.
--
Chris H,
He's predictable, but that's to be expected.
Please remove the numbers to reply
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:35:53 +0100
author: Chris H
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
"Chris H" wrote in message
news:7j19vaF346kjtU1@mid.individual.net...
>a l l y wrote:
>> "Sleepalot" wrote in message
>> news:gb9lc5li5o5nc4rt5f8cfv6oifds485pkd@4ax.com...
>>> "a l l y" wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Chris H" wrote in message
>>>> news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism
>>>>> associated with protests over new housing, but the threat to
>>>>> greenbelt land, which often are important wildlife corridors, is
>>>>> increasing due to pressure from developers.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>>>>>
>>>> Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the
>>>> woods - you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are
>>>> loads of brownfield
>>>> sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without
>>>> destroying
>>>> the countryside?
>>>>
>>> Apart from a couple of cities, we're the only county without a
>>> National Nature Reserve. Birmingham's got two, and Cumbria's
>>> got two dozen or more.
>>>
>> Is there anywhere in Warwickshire that you'd consider special enough
>> to designated as such?
>
Coombe Abbey Woods & Lake?
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:37:42 +0100
author: John Sullivan
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
John Sullivan wrote:
> "Chris H" wrote in message
> news:7j19vaF346kjtU1@mid.individual.net...
>> a l l y wrote:
>>> "Sleepalot" wrote in message
>>> news:gb9lc5li5o5nc4rt5f8cfv6oifds485pkd@4ax.com...
>>>> "a l l y" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Chris H" wrote in message
>>>>> news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>> I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism
>>>>>> associated with protests over new housing, but the threat to
>>>>>> greenbelt land, which often are important wildlife corridors, is
>>>>>> increasing due to pressure from developers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the
>>>>> woods - you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are
>>>>> loads of brownfield
>>>>> sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without
>>>>> destroying
>>>>> the countryside?
>>>>>
>>>> Apart from a couple of cities, we're the only county without a
>>>> National Nature Reserve. Birmingham's got two, and Cumbria's
>>>> got two dozen or more.
>>>>
>>> Is there anywhere in Warwickshire that you'd consider special enough
>>> to designated as such?
>>
> Coombe Abbey Woods & Lake?
Shame about that bloody big Rolls-Royce facility with its test beds right
next to it! Still, look on the bright side, I get to work near to an
impressive stately home.
<sheepish grin>
It's too 'managed' in one sense, but you're right it has some significant
areas of water and weirs with Herons and other water fowl. The main entrance
road, which I pass every day, is looking mighty impressive if the sun is out
first thing in the morning.
I could also nominate the countryside out towards Hatton Locks if it weren't
for the railway line. However, canals are important wildlife corridors.
--
Chris H,
He's predictable, but that's to be expected.
Please remove the numbers to reply
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:46:23 +0100
author: Chris H
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
"Chris H" wrote in message
news:7j1aivF2uirebU1@mid.individual.net...
> John Sullivan wrote:
>> "Chris H" wrote in message
>> news:7j19vaF346kjtU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> a l l y wrote:
>>>> "Sleepalot" wrote in message
>>>> news:gb9lc5li5o5nc4rt5f8cfv6oifds485pkd@4ax.com...
>>>>> "a l l y" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Chris H" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:7irmm4F32vjdmU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>> I appreciate that there is a certain amount of NIMBY-ism
>>>>>>> associated with protests over new housing, but the threat to
>>>>>>> greenbelt land, which often are important wildlife corridors, is
>>>>>>> increasing due to pressure from developers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/lifestyle-news/your-life/2009/10/01/fighting-to-save-our-green-belt-92746-24826637/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well you've got little enough green land left in your neck of the
>>>>>> woods - you must fight to preserve what's left! Surely there are
>>>>>> loads of brownfield
>>>>>> sites in the area that could be redeveloped for housing, without
>>>>>> destroying
>>>>>> the countryside?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Apart from a couple of cities, we're the only county without a
>>>>> National Nature Reserve. Birmingham's got two, and Cumbria's
>>>>> got two dozen or more.
>>>>>
>>>> Is there anywhere in Warwickshire that you'd consider special enough
>>>> to designated as such?
>>>
>> Coombe Abbey Woods & Lake?
>
> Shame about that bloody big Rolls-Royce facility with its test beds right
> next to it! Still, look on the bright side, I get to work near to an
> impressive stately home.
>
> <sheepish grin>
>
> It's too 'managed' in one sense, but you're right it has some significant
> areas of water and weirs with Herons and other water fowl.
Not to mention one of very few inland breeding sites for Great Cormorant.
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:57:36 +0100
author: John Sullivan
|
Re: Warwickshire Greenbelt
John Sullivan wrote:
> "Chris H" wrote in message
> news:7j1aivF2uirebU1@mid.individual.net...
>> John Sullivan wrote:
>>>>
>>> Coombe Abbey Woods & Lake?
>>
>> Shame about that bloody big Rolls-Royce facility with its test beds
>> right next to it! Still, look on the bright side, I get to work near
>> to an impressive stately home.
>>
>> <sheepish grin>
>>
>> It's too 'managed' in one sense, but you're right it has some
>> significant areas of water and weirs with Herons and other water
>> fowl.
>
> Not to mention one of very few inland breeding sites for Great
> Cormorant.
<impressed>
I did not know that. I just googled for ornotholigical marvels at
Coombe......and mostly read a lot of stuff about fishing.
Also, we do get a few lesser spotted Wood Peckers in the trees around the
R-R Ansty site and I never made the connection with Coombe Abbey before.
--
Chris H,
He's predictable, but that's to be expected.
Please remove the numbers to reply
date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:14:48 +0100
author: Chris H
|
|
|