The Prime Minister

Mr Tony Blair

10 Downing Street

London  SW1A 2AA.



STATEMENT OF TRUTH.



The Statements that I the undersigned, Maurice Kellett,  make herein below 
are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.



In 1986 in learned of crime that was being carried on at the then North East 
UK National Coal Board Estates Department, at Spennymoor, Co Durham. I was 
affected by it and pressed the matter with the management. Facts suggested 
that at least one of them was involved with it. After I would not drop the 
matter I was battered and then struck by a car that was deliberately driven 
at me by a man named Robert Willis Gardner Pringle. That same night 
Northumbria Police officers left me with no choice but to crawl most of the 
five or so miles to my home in the middle of the night during torrential 
rain. I was bleeding heavily from my injuries and the police doctor had no 
bandages whatsoever to help stem that. Police refused me hospital treatment. 
When I arrived home that morning a doctor attended me and confirmed that I 
had required it. He made a diagram of the injuries to my body that remains 
on my medical notes.



The First Use Of Crime Carried Out Against Me By Houghton-le-Spring, 
Tyne-Wear, Magistrates Court.



The matter detailed above went to Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Magistrates 
Court, UK. One of the sitting magistrates, Mr. William Moseley, in regular 
attendance at Hetton-le-Hole Masonic Hall, was a very close acquaintance of 
Pringle and I too had been friendly with him having obtained him work for 
his garage business. The case was dismissed by the court. When I approached 
Mr Moseley at his home on that same evening, he claimed that he had stood 
down from judgement in the Pringle affair. That despite it now being known 
that magistrates generally get several days prior warning of cases listed to 
be heard before them Much later a police officer told me that the Houghton 
Magistrates Court proceedings had been illegal. He said that that the 
remaining sitting magistrate, who had sat with Moseley on the bench,  had no 
qualifications to act alone. The fact of that has of late again been 
confirmed by a senior police officer. The manager of that court, a Mr 
Bavidge and the Lord Chancellors Department were parties to ignoring and 
attempting to cover up of the matter of those illegal Magistrates Court 
Proceedings. I have continued to pursue it without success. Northumbria 
Police have done their utmost to avoid investigating that matter throughout 
the years since.





First Durham County Court Serious Crime Used Against me.

Deputy District Judge Baird,  November 1993.



In November of 1993 I and on behalf of my wife, Joyce Kellett, appealed at 
the Durham County Court in the matter of a judgement made by District Judge 
Scott-Phillips. It related to damage to our property following a vehicle 
collision with it. My appeal against District Judge Scott-Phillips ruling 
was heard by Deputy District Judge Baird who refused it. I learned that a 
Deputy District Judge is not permitted by law to hear any appeal. Eventually 
the Durham County Court admitted that fact. That admission came only after I 
had pressed the matter with the Court and it had clearly attempted to cover 
up it up. When it was clear to the Court that I would not let the matter go, 
the Court wrote that my appeal had been heard by the wrong judge in error. 
That was a lame excuse. All judges and indeed solicitors generally, are well 
aware that it is illegal for a Deputy District Judge, as Baird was, to hear 
any Appeal. It was eventually lawfully heard by a Circuit Judge who upheld 
it. Deputy District Judge Baird had in the circumstances, carried out a 
serious crime against me by unlawfully hearing my Appeal. It was clear 
afterwards that in that matter, It had been heard before a man who had 
carried out serious judicial criminal deception against me. It is also 
considered that the crime of Misconduct in Public Office is also of 
relevance. No action was taken on that matter by either the Durham County 
Court or any of the relevant Authorities that I reported it to. Those 
Included Durham Constabulary who were later to refuse to accept any evidence 
concerning serious crime that had been carried out by Miss Shirley Carr, 
Solicitor Alison Stott and the Durham District Land Registry.



Newcastle County Court March 1994.



Deputy District Judge Baird.



In March of 1994 I was accused by my next door neighbour, Miss Shirley Carr, 
of 16 the Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, who was employed as a National 
Insurance Investigator, of being a trespasser on land which both I and my 
father had been in possession of for over twenty seven years. The original 
owner of it could not and never was traced. There was no adverse claim made 
against us throughout that full period of our occupation. In accordance with 
the Law we had in those circumstances become the lawful owners of it. The 
first hearing of my alleged trespass on that land was before Deputy District 
Judge Baird. I had of course previously exposed him, as detailed above, for 
his previous use of Criminal Deception which he had used against me. 
Unfortunately I had not recognised or associated him at that time as being 
the same criminal judge who had been primarily involved with my appeal at 
Durham County Court a few months earlier. Though I was in need of her 
assistance in the judges chambers, D.J. Baird refused my wife access to 
them. They were situated at the Newcastle County Court. He allowed Carr two 
representatives or advocates into his Chambers. One of them was Professor 
Kenny, who was said to be a regular contributor to The Law Society Journal. 
He would have been well aware that by speaking on the case as Baird had 
invited him to do was to say the least very improper. He had also paid Carr 
a visit at her home one Sunday afternoon which was not within the normal 
working ours of his employment. Both were employed at the University of 
Northumbria Law Clinic. Carr was in those circumstances unlawfully allowed 
the use of two advocates. DDJ Baird ignored my irrefutable evidence provided 
to him that I had not been a trespasser and ruled in the favour of Carr. DDJ 
Baird had shown in November 1992 that he was guilty of Criminal Deception. 
Having a second crack of the whip to pay me back for exposing his crime 
would all appear to fit in with his character.



Shirley Carr has never been able to substantiate what is shown to have been 
her false allegation that I, or indeed my father in the circumstances, were 
trespassers on the land in question. She simply had no entitlement  to the 
land whatsoever. Recorder John H Fryer Spedding ruled that fact in October 
1996. That despite his numerous acts, many of which are evidenced by his own 
approved transcript of judgement, were clearly meant to pervert the course 
of justice. A summary examination by anyone with even slight legal expertise 
would be able to confirm that. Despite that ruling, The Chief Registrar of 
the Durham District Land Registry ignored that ruling and unlawfully allowed 
Carr to register our land subject of Newcastle County Court case NE401650 
into Carr's name. Following my meeting with Mr Timothy late last year (2002) 
I am satisfied that he too is a mason.



In March 1994 I took out a civil action against Carr at the Durham County 
Court. That followed her refusal to name the people who had carried out the 
re-roofing of her property in late 1993 (Durham County Court case No: 
DH400898.) That work had been commenced on a Saturday morning and had been 
completed by the following Sunday evening. What was the reason that work was 
done on a weekend?  They had caused damage to our house during that work and 
had also refused to identify themselves to us so that the normal course of 
law could be pursued. I also took out an action for damage being caused to 
our property following steps having been taken by Carr to ensure that our 
property received drainage coming from her adjoining property (Durham County 
Court case DH400950). It had no drainage facilities at the rear of it. It is 
clear that she had purchased that property at a reduced price because it had 
no working drains on it. My Durham County Court cases No. DH400950 and 
DH400898 along with Carr's Newcastle County case No. NE401650 continued. On 
June 1st 1994 Shirley Carr's application to the Durham County Court for 
consolidation of the cases into her case NE401650 was heard before District 
Judge Scott-Phillips. He refused her application and Ordered that the above 
cases could not be subject of consolidation. His Order was never subject of 
Appeal and stood at the time Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged 
that the cases had been subject of consolidation. Then he unlawfully tried 
them that way as a consolidated case under Carr's case No: NE401650. My two 
prosecution cases DH400950, and my defence case in NE401650 had been 
prepared under the Order made on the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation, 
mentioned above, of the cases. In the event, my case notes were of little 
use. However, recorder John H Fryer Spedding had warned me that my pointing 
out to him that Carr had commenced to swear perjury will she was under my 
cross examination, would do me no good. He also agreed that it was his 
intention to deprive me of my rights. The latter statement is agreed in his 
approved transcript of judgement. It is not difficult to see from the 
available catalogue of events, details of which are all readily available, 
that he had the prior intention that I would be his victim.





The authorities who were made aware of that criminal act by Spedding, along 
with a catalogue of his other crimes used to defeat my cases, ignored it. As 
a further example of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's perversion of the 
course of justice, he said that my right of way across the garden purchased 
by Carr had come to an end because that right had not been reserved in the 
conveyance of it to Carr. One of the most commonly used sections of law used 
in the conveyance of property is Section 62 of The Law of Property Act 1925 
where included in it is all rights, easements, appurtenances,  privileges 
etc. etc. are deemed to be conveyed with a property unless specifically 
revoked in it. That had not happened. Indeed the opposite was true because 
the vendors of that property had been my own parents. My father swore an 
affidavit agreeing the fact that our right of way was not revoked. That was 
only one part of the large amount of evidence that Spedding ignored. 
Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding also falsely alleged that we had required a 
thirty year term to obtain a title by adverse possession of the land subject 
of case NE401650. That was only another of his many lies. Only the twelve 
year period was in question and we had well exceeded that term anyway.





Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was alleged to have been a judge with 
Chancery experience. I cannot think that such experience which had allowed 
him to make such untrue statements, had come from any Court of Law that I 
know of.  Spedding agreed these statement in his approved transcript of 
judgement. Video evidence taken at the time our land subject of case 
NE401650 was fenced from the garden owned by Carr was shown to Spedding. His 
statements regarding what was shown in it bore nothing whatsoever to the 
truth of what he was shown in it. Newcastle County Court refused me access 
to the tape recordings made at the kangaroo court held by Spedding there in 
October 1996. That served as evidence of their part in the attempted cover 
up of Spedding's crime used against me.  People who ignored these facts and 
many others showing Spedding's crimes included  Lord Justices Auld and Pill, 
The Court Service, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the 
Attorney General. This has clearly been a situation where Establishment 
crime was, and remains as being protected by yet more Establishment crime. 
The fact that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had  consistently lied and that 
is shown and proved by his own approved transcript of judgement, there is no 
doubt. His reasons for having done that to me remains in some doubt. 
However, I am sure that it had been his reward for me having contributed to 
the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry 
within the Police and judiciary ( Nolan Inquiry).



I obtained from Sunderland Local Authority substantial evidence that Carr 
had sworn very material perjury in her court submissions in the matter of 
case DH400950. Then she applied for an injunction clearly to deter me from 
seeking and taking further evidence of her crime. The injunction application 
was heard by District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Durham County Court 
in September 1995. D.J. Cuthbertson agreed that solicitor Alison Stott be 
allowed to prepare the draft of joint undertakings agreed between Carr and I 
in general principle. He then adjourned the proceedings without making it 
known when those proceedings were to recommence. In January 1996 solicitor 
Alison Stott declared to the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John 
H Fryer-Spedding that up to that day she had not in fact been acting for 
Carr but had only been assisting her. In those same circumstances alone, as 
Carr's assistant, solicitor Stott was party to criminal deception by failing 
to declare to the Durham County Court she was even at that time only Carr's 
assistant and had not been her advocate. That was not the least of her use 
of crimes against me. I will detail some of the others later in this 
document. Stott's declaration to the Newcastle County Court in January 1996 
mentioned above, was in fact an acknowledge of her serious use of crime. 
That same very serious crime was reported to Durham Constabulary and The 
Office For The Supervision of Solicitors who simply ignored it.



Two days after the injunction hearing before DJ Cuthbertson, my wife and I, 
received a copy of an Order made by DJ Cuthbertson granting all that Carr 
had applied for in her injunction application. I appealed against that 
Order. My Appeal was  again heard by D.J. Cuthbertson who refused it. In the 
circumstances that Appeal too had been illegal. A judge is not permitted by 
law to hear any appeal from his own judgement.  I never accepted the lawful 
validity of DJ Cuthbertson's Order. In June of 1996 I was accused of having 
been in breach of DJ Cuthbertson's injunction Order. Part of his Order was 
that I was not allowed to speak to Carr. After that Order had been granted 
Carr falsely claimed to the  Sunderland Public Health Department that our 
two dogs barked incessantly which was only another of her many lies. Shortly 
after that while sat in our garden, one of our dogs started to bark at 
noises coming from the adjoining fence between Carr's property and our own. 
When it carried on, I put some steps up against the fence and looked over 
it. There I saw Carr with something in her hand and scratching it against 
the fence. In her other hand was a microphone. It was clear even then what 
her intention had been. I called her some appropriate names in my outrage. 
She obviously tape recorded at least part of that. She had however edited 
part of that recording to her advantage. Evidence provided by Carr to the 
Courts, showed that she had secretly tape recorded a conversation between my 
wife and I while we sat in the privacy of our own kitchen. It had been done 
by her placing a microphone up to the open window. In July of 1995 while my 
wife and I had been on holiday, Mr Norman Pringle who lives with Carr, had 
gone into our property and altered guttering on it to allow Carr's property 
drainage to flow more freely onto ours. He agreed that he had done that in 
his affidavit. The results of his work were video filmed when my wife and I 
returned from holiday. In 1996 when my wife and I went on holiday we left a 
video camera pointing down the boundary fence between our property and 
Carr's. It had not been in use anyway as no equipment could record for the 
two weeks unattended while we were away on holiday. It had been meant as a 
deterrent to Pringle against trespassing and altering our property. Circuit 
Judge Helen Paling would I feel sure have been aware of that fact but still 
sentenced me to imprisonment. Later, which I will detail, she was to prove 
to me her unfitness to be a judge.



An application was made in July 1996 by Carr for my imprisonment under her 
allegation that I had breached the injunction as in the above described 
circumstances, which District Judge had granted under what had been illegal 
circumstances.  I was found guilty of that allegation at Newcastle Crown 
Court by Circuit Judge Helen Paling and then sentenced to three months 
imprisonment at Durham. There I had a stroke and was released on appeal. My 
sentence was then suspended.



At the outset of the cases and around late June 1994, a solicitor by the 
name of Nancy Bone practising from Durham, made an application for Legal Aid 
for us. It was refused on the grounds that insufficient information had been 
given to the Legal aid Board by her. Bone then asked us for over two 
thousand pounds for having made that application. I would not pay it. In 
fact there had never been any mention whatsoever by Bone of any costs for a 
Legal Aid application. Then she withheld all of my files by lien. I made an 
application to the Durham County Court which was heard before DJ 
Scott-Phillips, that I be allowed to visit the Offices of Bone to take 
copies from my files to allow me to proceed. He granted that Order. Bone 
breached it and was in those circumstances guilty of Contempt of Court.  She 
had locked me out of her offices. I contacted the Durham County Court and 
was told that DJ Scott-Phillips had not granted such Order. The Court 
manager. Mr I Cuthbertson said that DJ Scott-Philips had told him that my 
visit to Bone's office had only been by her agreement. That was a lie but I 
could not prove it then. Around two years after the final hearing of the 
cases before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding, Bone was struck from the 
Register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct in other people's cases. Another 
solicitor returned my files that Bone had withheld. They included copies of 
letters that she had sent to the Durham County Court. In them she had 
referred to my visit to her office as being by Order of the Court. That was 
proof that the Court and/or DJ Scott-Phillips had lied about the matter and 
had protected solicitor Bone from a probable Contempt of Court conviction.



On the 1st June 1994 District Judge Scott-Phillips at the Durham County 
Court Ordered that the three cases mentioned above, DH400950, DH400898 and 
NE401650 between Carr and I could not be subject of consolidation into one 
case. Solicitor Alison Stott had been going into court with Carr from late 
June 1994. In 1995 she took on the work of preparing the judges bundles 
ready for trial. She secretly passed on that work for Carr to carry out 
herself. In October 1996 recorder John H Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that 
the cases had been subject of consolidation.  Despite my protests he went 
ahead and tried them as a single action. After three days he ruled that I 
was to pay five sixth of all costs. His approved transcript of Judgement 
still serves as substantial evidence that it had been his prior intent to 
pervert the course of justice. I have published it along with my replies to 
it in Statement of Truth format. During the proceedings, he had warned me 
against highlighting to him that Carr was swearing perjury during my cross 
examination of her. Her contradictions of previous statements made on oath 
proved that fact. He said it would do me no good. About a week later I 
reported recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's crime to then Lord Chancellor 
Mackay. Spedding  then went into what was shown to been a sudden decision to 
retire. When Carr had prepared the judges bundles, without the knowledge or 
consent of the Durham County Court, she later agreed that she had 
deliberately left out documents which she said as not being important. One 
of them was the Order made on the 1st June 1994 refusing her application for 
consolidation of the three actions that had, in the circumstances 
unlawfully, been heard before  recorder Spedding as a single action. In any 
event, he was required by Supreme Court rules to have seen a copy of the 
alleged Order for consolidation of the cases. There was none, only the Order 
refusing consolidation of the cases. I had prepared my two prosecution cases 
and one defence case as per the Order of the 1st June 1994  refusing 
consolidation of the cases. At what was a kangaroo court presided over by 
recorder Spedding I was thrown into complete disarray.



I sought leave to appeal recorder Spedding's judgement at the London High 
Court. It was heard before Lord's Justices Auld and Pill. I supplied them 
with a huge amount of evidence showing  evidence of the injustice that I was 
deliberately being subjected to. I also supplied them with a copy of the 
Order made by District Judge Scott-Phillips at Durham on 1st June 1994 
refusing Carr's application for consolidation of the three cases. That alone 
should have been sufficient for granting my application for leave to appeal. 
They refused it. In 1996/97 I had contributed to the House of Commons Home 
Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and 
Judiciary. It was common knowledge I had done that. I was still at that time 
in correspondence with Lord Nolan on matters concerning Freemasonry and that 
continued until January of 1998. He wrote then telling me that he was 
returning to being a Member of the Law Lords. Lord Justice Auld spent a 
large amount of the time they had allocated for my application in an attempt 
to persuade me the possibility of Masonic involvement in the injustice that 
had been dealt out was unlikely.  I wrote to LJ Auld and Pill afterwards. I 
asked that Lord Justice Auld and Pill having spent so much time on the 
matter of my concerns regarding Freemasonry would they in those 
circumstances agree their having any membership of Freemasonry. The letter I 
received from their secretary was that they did not enter into 
correspondence with litigants who had been before them. In fact their 
failure to make such denial or admission of Masonic membership was a breach 
of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.



Solicitor Alison Stott practising from Durham, had been attending the Durham 
County Court from around late June 1994. In January 1996 she declared to the 
Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer Spedding that she 
had not been acting for Carr but had only been assisting her. There were 
witnesses to her declaration and affidavits sworn relative to it. Spedding 
replied to her that she was either acting for Carr or she was not. Her reply 
was that, "well I am now sir". As Carr's assistant Stott had no legal 
authority for work that she had been given by the Court in the matter of the 
injunction application against me in 1995 which had imprisoned me in 1996. 
Neither did she have any authority to take on the work of preparing the 
judges bundle or indeed its authority to pass that work on for Carr to carry 
out. Last year 2002, Durham County Court agreed following their search of 
the files, there was no authority on record to allow solicitor Stott to 
prepare the judges bundle. That of course had also been true of the 
situation relative to Shirley Carr. That these two people had been guilty of 
serious crime there is no doubt whatsoever. The mass of evidence showing 
that still remains.



 In March 1999 I was made bankrupt at the Durham County Court in the sum of 
£15.800. Included in the bankruptcy costs were solicitor Stott's costs 
throughout which included the time period that she was, as she had declared 
in January 1996, was only Carr's assistant. My bankruptcy costs, having been 
engineered on a bed of crime, some of which is described here, included 
solicitor Stott's costs as if she had in fact been acting as Carr's advocate 
rather than her assistant as she had previously declared. That amounted to 
fraud under the Theft Act. That still needs to be investigated. Durham 
Constabulary are aware of that fraud but have refused to take any action on 
it. Those who have made that decision are in those circumstances shown to be 
liable for prosecution under the Regina-v-Dytham case, for Misconduct in 
Public Office. They are also held to be liable for other action. Facts and 
evidence showing that the final hearing of the cases before John H 
Fryer-Spedding had been illegal by virtue of the 1st June 1994 Order 
refusing consolidation of the cases. That too was also ignored by the 
bankruptcy court as it had also been by Lords Justices Auld and Pill. My 
appeal against that bankruptcy was refused by Mr Peter Leaver QC at the 
London Appeal Court. He said that he had no interest in the evidence that I 
had supplied to him which showed the sea of fraud used to engineer my 
bankruptcy. Part of it included the 1st June 1994 Order by the Durham County 
Court refusing consolidation of the cases. Mr Leaver said that he had no 
interest in that evidence only whether the actual bankruptcy proceedings had 
been legal. He added another two thousand pounds costs on for my bankruptcy 
appeal. Attending that appeal was Shirley Carr, solicitor Stott and 
barrister Mr Richard Merritt acting for Carr. Merrit had been aware that the 
cases had unlawfully been heard as a consolidated action before recorder 
John H Fryer-Spedding. He had in fact corrected his defence and prosecution 
case submission reflecting that fact  when that point had been made to known 
to solicitor Stott by my solicitor Mrs P. Tench a few weeks earlier. In 
those circumstances solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merrit are 
further implicated in the crime/misconduct used against me. It would appear 
at the very least that their obligations to the duties of their profession 
and to their duties as Officers of the Courts were ignored to the point that 
was a criminal act.



In the matter of the land subject of my alleged trespass, solicitor Stott 
was in receipt of evidence that another solicitor, Mr Paul Graney, also 
since struck from the register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct in other 
peoples cases, had sworn perjury in a Statutory Declaration which had been 
used to lodge a caution on the land subject of the trespass case at the 
Durham District Land Registry ( NE401650). She failed, indeed refused to 
make that information known to the land Registry. Northumbria and Durham 
Constabulary ignored those matters even after solicitor Graney had sworn an 
affidavit agreeing that the information he had sworn in his Statutory 
Declaration used to register a caution at HM Land Registry had been untrue. 
Evidence by means of his own letters which came to light had proved that 
fact anyway. That evidence was shown to detective sergeant McGann and 
detective constable Storey at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. 
They falsely claimed that swearing perjury was not a police matter.



Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding ruled that Carr had no entitlement to a 
possessory title to the land subject of my alleged trespass under case 
NE401650. Despite that, Mr Patrick Timothy Chief registrar of the Durham 
District Land Registry, who was provided with a copy of that ruling, ignored 
it despite my protests. He unlawfully allowed the land subject of that 
matter to registered into Carr's name. I, and my father (since deceased) 
still have lawful title to that land despite it having been stolen from me 
by none other than crime as a mass of evidence shows.



My father had taken an action at the Durham County Court to go back onto 
possession of the land sunject of case NE401650. Recorder John H Fryer 
Spedding had ruled, and that is included in his approved transcript of 
judgement, that my father was the most likely person to have title to it. 
His application was heard before District Judge Cuthbertson.  D.J. 
Cuthbertson ruled that my fathers application was an abuse of court time and 
then dismissed it. My father appealed that ruling. I represented him at the 
Sunderland County Court. The judge in that matter was Circuit Judge Helen 
Paling. She was the judge who had previously sentenced me to three months 
imprisonment at Durham for alleged Contempt of Court. At the outset of the 
hearing she told me to be quiet and then dismissed my father's appeal 
without my being able to present it on his behalf. My father ran from the 
courtroom when I became subject of nothing short of a verbal onslaught from 
CJ Helen Paling. The court usher had expressed concern about his safety 
following that. I wrote to the Lord Chancellor about that matter. CJ Paling 
made an excuse then which effectively said that it had been a mistake. It 
could not have been a mistake and that matter was never corrected by the 
Court. My fathers health went downhill. He collapsed and died two days after 
my bankruptcy was published front page on the local Press in April 1999. The 
publication had also included that I was thereafter barred from being a Town 
Councillor by virtue of that bankruptcy ruling. He had been very upset at 
the whole affair and that was considered by a family member as being a 
contributory factor in his death.



I had been accused by Carr of approaching her at the Sunderland County Court 
and threatening  harassment of her. Her accusation had been made relative to 
the day my fathers appeal case should have been heard by CJ Paling at the 
Sunderland County Court. That allegation and another she had made against me 
had also been untrue. I was found guilty of  Carr's allegation at 
Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates court and received a huge fine with costs. It 
was that same Court who had previously carried out serious crime against me 
by its illegal proceedings in 1986 mentioned above. That was a matter which 
I had never let go of. It was at that time that I became sure that members 
of Freemasonry had been involved in that. My appeal against that conviction 
was refused. Judge Moir and two lay magistrates sitting at the Newcastle 
Combined Courts, had been informed a week earlier that I would require that 
they declare any membership of Freemasonry. After around a half hour 
adjournment, Judge Moir said that they would not make that declaration. 
Following a ruling in 2002, (Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02) their 
judgement in that matter as in the cases detailed here, is shown to have 
been a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. While 
I had asked that that the barrister then acting for me, Mr Neil Addison, 
require that same declaration from the judges sitting at the London Appeal 
Court in that matter, I am unsure now as to whether he had in fact made that 
known to the judges. I have reason to believe that he had not done that and 
that suggests what I know from my  experience to be a general fear of 
mentioning anything to do with Freemasonry in our Courts.



A few months after my Appeal against conviction for alleged harassment of 
Carr, I collected a file from solicitors Harding, Swinburne, Jackson & Co of 
Sunderland. They were the solicitors representing me in my appeal.  They had 
kept my files for a long time after my failed appeal under their allegation 
that they still needed them. Eventually I went to their offices and a clerk 
gave them to me apparently believing it had been agreed that I could collect 
them. When I  examined them at home, there was a copy of a letter written by 
Mr Head, Senior Prosecutor of the Washington, Tyne-Wear Crown Prosecution 
Service. He had written it to my former solicitors, Jackson's of Hartlepool, 
Co. Cleveland. It read that a security officer, a Mr Michael Golding, who 
was on duty in the Sunderland County Court at the time of the allegation 
made against me by Carr and had been spoken to by police. The letter said 
that Mr Golding had told Northumbria Police that nothing of note had 
occurred in the court at the time Carr had made that allegation of my 
threatening harassment  of her. That letter was never submitted in my 
defence evidence in my prosecution or during my appeals against it 
afterwards. Northumbria Police agreed that the evidence of that letter was 
material to my defence and that it had been a criminal act to deliberately 
withhold it from the courts. They agreed to investigate that and other 
matters of crime used against me, including the matter of the illegal 
Houghton Magistrates Court proceedings in 1986. They have never done that. 
They had allegedly appointed an acting Inspector Steve Coxon to deal with 
those matters. Weeks afterward it became very clear to me that all in fact 
he had been doing was acting and nothing else.



I was a New Labour member of Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear,  Town Council. I 
spoke out at Council meetings against four family members, all Easington 
Lane Ward Councillors having failed to declare an interest in the matter of 
land owned by one of them which was subject of Council discussion for 
proposed housing. Instead of declaring an interest and not taking part in 
that discussion, all were part of it and two of them spoke in favour of that 
housing. When I spoke out against their failure to declare that interest at 
a Hetton Council meeting, the Councillor who owned that land stopped me from 
leaving the Council Chambers. Two of his Councillor family members held me 
while I was being pushed back from the door. The Councillor who owned that 
land subject of Council discussion, a member of the Freemasons, then drew 
his arm back in a clear action to deliver a blow to my head. That was 
prevented by Councillor Mr George Wandless who took hold of that man and 
pulled him away from me. I continued to be subject of threats from them. 
Immediately before that Council meeting, I had been asked by that mason 
Councillor if I owned my own home. I replied that I did. He implied that if 
I mentioned their failure to declare an interest in the land mentioned 
above, I might end up not owning it. That is exactly what has happened as a 
result of the serious crime which I have reported to you as Prime Minister 
since you took Office and before in 1997 when you were Leader of the 
Opposition. I made complaint on that matter to Northumbria Police. Inspector 
Williamson was appointed to investigate that matter. He never even 
approached me at all. He declared a few days later that as he did not think 
the rest of the Town Councillors would say what they had witnessed of the 
assault on me and what amounted to my false imprisonment by the Councillors, 
he had decided not to take any action on that matter. That Inspector retired 
several months later. I have good reason to believe that he too was a member 
of the Freemasons.



My wife, myself and our two daughters became subject of a death threat. A 
man said that he would stab us. He went on to say that if we reported that 
matter to Northumbria Police he would repeat that same threat made against 
us to them as well. A Northumbria Police officer was called. He went to see 
the man who did indeed repeat that same death threat made against us to him 
as well. No action was taken on that matter either by Northumbria Police. 
This Mr Prime Minister is the way criminal elements of Freemasonry works and 
there are a large number of other people who can bear witness to that. It is 
only one of the many reasons why all those employed in the public service 
must be compelled to declare any membership of Freemasonry. While I 
understand your government will not do that because of possible violations 
of the European Human Rights Convention under the Privacy Article, by using 
that same argument crime rings too could make that same claim.



In 1999 after further false allegations made by Shirley Carr I was arrested 
and taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear,  Police Station. My request for a doctor 
to attend me was ignored. I requested a solicitor but that too was ignored. 
I asked that someone be informed as to where I was being held. That request 
too was ignored. After around two hours I had breathing difficulties. Only 
when I made a further request that a doctor attend me did the custody 
sergeant telephone one. I was allowed to speak with that doctor on the 
telephone and told him my symptoms and medication that I was undergoing. He 
informed the custody sergeant that I must be taken immediately to hospital. 
Following my admission there and examination, It was confirmed that I had 
been seriously ill. The Police Complaints Authority confirmed afterwards 
that I had been unlawfully arrested and that my continued detainment by 
Northumbria Police has also been unlawful. The PCA letter agreeing that was 
only part of the huge amount of documents now missing following the seizure 
of my home on 5th February 2003.



A man criminally assaulted both my wife and I at our home. He had just 
previously caused criminal damage to our property. When Northumbria Police 
were called to the scene, the man agreed that he had carried out those acts. 
Nothing was heard again from Northumbria Police on that matter as well.



Following having taken part in a radio discussion relative to Freemasonry in 
November of 1997 a man called at our home the following morning. In short he 
suggested that I would never be able to beat Freemasonry for what it is 
known by many to be generally up to. He warned that someone by the name I 
believe was Mr John Coates had been  like me and would not stop voicing his 
concerns about Freemasonry. He went on to say that  his deep freezer 
situated at South Shields, had been burnt down as a result of that. His 
implication was that our home could become subject of similar treatment. In 
January of 1998 my wife and I heard evidence that the threat of having our 
home burnt down was real because a deep freezer business had in fact been 
burnt down at South Shields. I reported that matter to a Northumbria police 
officer and that was also ignored by them. My wife had asked that we sell 
our home and try to flee from the situation. That is never possible where 
Freemasonry in concerned and the reasons for that are numerous.



This type of behaviour by Northumbria Police is all too common to me. Its 
Chief Constable is reputed to be a member of Freemasonry. He had never 
issued any denial of that when I requested he do that in my letters sent to 
him. I am aware of a number of its senior officers also being masons. That 
would follow given that masons are required to give preference to their 
Masonic brothers in the well known oaths that they all make. Freemasonry is 
also known as The Brotherhood which sets them aside all other considerations 
when dealing with them.



In late 2002 a possession Order for my home was made at the Teesside County 
Court in the favour of Carr. My bankruptcy engineered on nothing short of a 
bed of crime, had allowed that situation. It had been my home most of the 
time since 1947. I appealed against it on the 20th January this year (2003) 
at the Teesside County Court. Durham County Court could not hear that matter 
because I have made a damages claim against it for its use of crime against 
me detailed above. They are continuing to ignore it and had previously 
alleged the matter had been referred to the London Court Service to deal 
with. When I contacted them weeks after the Durham County Court allegation 
that it had been referred to them, they told me that they had no record of 
that. I have heard nothing from any of them since that time. Judge 
Mainwaring-Taylor refused my application to set aside the possession Order 
for my home. He had wrongly ruled that my concerns at possible Masonic 
influence in my cases was of no relevance ( Commissioners Case No: 
CSI/136/02).



The Durham County Court quickly arranged my appeal hearing of his ruling. It 
was heard at Teesside County Court on Thursday 30th January this year. I had 
provided the judge, as yet unnamed to me, with a copy of the Commissioners 
Case No: CSI/136/02 . It related to a litigant who also had concerns at 
possible Masonic involvement in his case which a tribunal had ignored. The 
Appeal  ruling was that by failing to instil a feeling of confidence in that 
litigant, it had been an automatic violation to Article 6(1) of the European 
Human Rights Convention and the his appeal was upheld. When the judge at the 
Teesside County of the 30th January started to read that CSI/136/02 ruling 
he was clearly shocked and asked if the solicitor for Carr had seen it. He 
indicated that he had. I took ill very shortly afterwards and the judge 
immediately adjourned the case. I was taken by ambulance to hospital and 
spent some time in a cardiac care ward until late the following day. I had 
provided the judge and Carr's solicitor with the necessary protocols 
required for my application for Judicial Review in my cases. I had also 
provided them with my skeleton argument which the Protocols required. 
Nothing whatsoever was heard from the courts after that.



On Monday 2nd February this year (2003)  a bailiff arrived at my home 
accompanied by Northumbria Police officers. I saw him trying to force entry 
to my home watched by police officers.  I warned them that what he was doing 
was illegal but the bailiff continued to try to force entry to my home. It 
was then that I decided to stay my ground against what had been nothing less 
than the massive use of crime that had brought about that situation. I took 
an ornamental sword used as an ornament and threatened to fall on it if the 
bailiff did not stop trying to force the door to my home. He still continued 
with his attempt to force entry.  I took petrol from a can in my rear garden 
and poured some over me and held an unlighted match close to me. I warned 
that if an entry was made to my home, they would just have to take what they 
would find of me. More police officers arrived. Two police negotiators 
started to talk to me. My telephone and gas supply was turned off by the 
police. I had told one of the police negotiators, a female officer named to 
me as Jo, that I would hand some evidence of my allegations of the crime 
used to bring about that situation to her through my kitchen window. It was 
then that she warned me from going near that window and it was then made 
clear to me that police marksmen had been stationed outside my home and were 
looking for an opportunity to shoot me. Jo told me she would go and have a 
word with them.



Later that Monday evening police cut off my electricity. The next day my 
water supply off. I was able to drink a little that I presume had been left 
in the pipes. I was very sick after drinking it. When I saw the water the 
following morning it was heavily discoloured. On the third night Northumbria 
Police Special Squad officers battered down the door of my home. I stood at 
the top of the stairs of it and was trying to pluck up courage to fall on 
the sword that I held. Two Special Squad officers complete with riot shield, 
visors etc, quickly made their way up the stairs and handcuffed me while 
they were all yelling and screaming presumably to distract me. Two Special 
Squad officers held my shoulders but left my sword between my hands so I 
could not move it. Then they proceeded to make noises that were very clearly 
meant to co-ordinate their pressure on my shoulders while pushing my abdomen 
down onto the sword. Another Special Squad Officer was near to the top of 
the stairs. On seeing what his colleagues were attempting to do to me, he 
grabbed the handcuffs and pulled the sword away then dragged me headlong 
down the stairs away from his colleagues, the two would be murderers. I 
suffered superficial wounds to my abdomen resulting from that murder 
attempt.



I ended up at Sunderland Royal Hospital with a twenty four hour continued 
throughout Northumbria Police guard. The next two days no one was allowed to 
visit me at the hospital. Only when they were warned by someone with legal 
knowledge that what they were continuing to do was also illegal did they 
allow me visitors. However, I was not allowed them without a police officer 
in attendance. One of them confirmed to me that anything that passed in the 
conversation between my visitors and myself  was being noted for possible 
use. Essential medication that I needed and which a police doctor had 
obtained especially for me was never sent to hospital. That caused me 
problems when I ended up taking some wrong medication.



Before the siege of my home  started on 2nd  February, and the just previous 
Teesside County Court proceedings, I had received a letter from your Mr Matt 
Dowding of 10 Downing Street, London. Last year I had forwarded on a damages 
claim made against you for what I consider has been a serious failure in 
what I consider to have been your duty as prime Minister to set in motion 
the necessary mechanism to allow the UK citizen access  to independent and 
impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of 
our criminal and civil rights. That as you will know is a requirement of 
Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. Mr Dowding's letter of 
the 16th January 2003 related to that matter. It read that my letters and 
claim made against you were being passed on to the Lord Chancellors 
Department to deal with. I have not had any communication from that 
Department following that. My claim against you is being revised in an 
upward direction following the events which have taken place in my case over 
this past year. Mr Fraser Kemp MP,  sent had copy bundles of evidence of the 
judicial and other crimes that had been used against me to, The Lord 
Chancellors Department, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner  and 
the Attorney General. None of these authorities accepted any responsibility 
to act on the matter of judicial crime or indeed the evidence showing that. 
Letters that Mr Kemp MP had received from these authorities confirmed that 
fact. I then asked in my letter to Mr Kemp MP if he would raise these 
matters for and in the general public interest in the House of Commons. He 
replied in his  letter that he was not permitted to raise issues in the 
House. That still requires an explanation.



There is absolutely no doubt that had we had such independent authorities 
for me to turn to as required under Article 6(1) of the European Human 
Rights Convention in the matter of the Establishment crime of which I am 
subject, the situation of the seizure of my home in February would not have 
come about. Now it has also been effectively confirmed via Mr Fraser Kemp MP 
that the Judiciary generally have become a law to themselves. This is itself 
a very serious matter in addition to the deprival of our rights of access to 
independent authorities ect, for the resolution of our criminal and civil 
rights as required under the European Human Rights Convention. The question 
that remains is who was it who decided that my murder was a solution to the 
Establishment crime problem? That decision had surely come from high 
authority?



Finally, my wife and I, since divorced after thirty years of marriage, 
purchased a property at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in the sum of £65.000 
cash in late April 1998. That purchase had been made with our money and 
while we were still married and was registered at HM Land Registry in my 
wife's name. I was made bankrupt in March 1999 in the sum of £15.800. I had 
made the Official Receiver situated at Stockton-on-Tees, aware of that 
purchase. According to the law, all financial transactions leading up to a 
bankruptcy for a period of two years are deemed to be taken into 
consideration for the purposes of it. That section of law was ignored in my 
case. After that purchase my wife's own hand written financial accounts 
which she had hidden from me, showed that there was £27.600 remaining after 
that house purchase. In addition, she had used forgery to obtain Land 
Registry registration of our marital home into here sole name at 16A The 
Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, which had previously been registered in our joint 
names. Land which had been registered at the Durham District Land Registry 
in my sole name, became registered again by means of forgery, into my wife's 
sole name. Evidence shows that she had then sold or whatever those assets 
which had been mine to the Trustee in Bankruptcy. The value of those assets 
far exceeds the amount claimed in my bankruptcy even had it been obtained 
without the use of the mass crimes I have again reported to you.



North Yorkshire Police, in whose area my wife had purchased the property at 
Dacre Banks is, refused to act on my allegations regarding that. I 
threatened Mr Kenworthy, the North Yorkshire Chief Constable with citizens 
arrest for failing to carry out his duty on that matter. Only then did he 
send two detectives north to see me at my home at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. 
They saw and took copies of the evidence of my wife's hand written accounts 
and were made aware of the cash house purchase by her at Dacre Banks. That 
purchase had been well within the period relative to bankruptcy. They 
detectives told me that they had sufficient evidence to act  and returned to 
North Yorkshire. Around two weeks later I received a letter from North 
Yorkshire Police saying that there was insufficient evidence to act on my 
allegations. Even a simple check at HM Land Registry would have provided 
sufficient evidence of that £65.000 cash purchase by my wife, let alone the 
rest of it. That was again a clear indication that I was subject of a 
conspiracy which I attribute that to the influence of Freemasonry.



The thread of their very obvious influence remained throughout and had 
started with the illegal Houghton-le-Spring Magistrate Court proceedings in 
1986. The Magistrate, Mr William Moseley, who later claimed he had stood 
down from judgement when I asked him to explain his presence on the bench, 
was in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole, Masonic Hall. Pringle, the man 
who had  battered me and then struck me with his car that he had 
deliberately driven at me, supplied the local Masonic Halls with fruit and 
vegetables for use in their functions.



This is not a full account of what was carried out against me by what has 
undoubtedly  amounted to high level authority crime. It is however I think 
the most substantive. I have been subject of other crime carried out by a 
doctor and police officers where again there was evidence of a thread of 
Freemasonry involved in that as well. Indications are that the problem of 
Masonic membership within the medical profession is also a problem. I had 
been an active supporter of Mr Chris Mullin MP's Private Members, Secret 
Societies Declaration Bill which failed when it was talked out of time in 
the House of Commons several years ago. Later he wrote to me hinting at his 
concern of the number of MP's who were masons. Now it is my understanding 
that Mr Mullin MP pays his Constituency Office rent to the Durham Grand 
Lodge of Freemasonry. Just over a year ago he was forefront in the obtaining 
of a £35.000 public grant for the restoration of one of Sunderland's Masonic 
Halls.



The Court Service has advised that I employ a solicitor to act for me in 
these matters. However, again from my past experience, I have found 
solicitors generally to be involved with matters involving crime and 
misconduct. It is now a well known fact by me following my experience with 
them, and from the experience of many others that the Office For The 
Supervision Of Solicitors is more often involved in covering up legal 
profession crime and misconduct that in protecting the public from it. I 
suggest that is an all too common problem coming from self regulatory 
authorities. They have done that to me now several times. In addition, 
solicitors, being Officers of the Courts, cannot reasonably be claimed to be 
independent or impartial in matters concerning judicial crime. I am also 
very aware of substantial membership of Freemasonry within the legal 
profession generally and that too I know has been a factor involved in my 
situation.



I have previously asked that you have a Public Inquiry into my case. My 
request to you regarding that has not been granted. I am aware that if such 
Inquiry was carried out by those authorities or tribunals as required under 
Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which we simply don't have, it would show that all 
UK citizens and not just myself, have a very serious problem with the denial 
of our rights. Mr Fraser Kemp MP's letters and evidence sent to the various 
authorities I have named show  that the judiciary  is not accountable to the 
public or any authority.



A list of names is being drawn up of those involved in judicial crime who, 
by use of their crimes, have rendered themselves liable to a lawful citizens 
arrest. Such arrest  is extended to all those who fail to carry out their 
considered public duty to act on that crime or to those who try to prevent 
such lawful arrests from taking place.



I again ask that you set in motion the necessary mechanism to set up an 
Independent Inquiry into my case. It is clear from evidence that I have at 
hand that none of what is considered as being the relevant authorities will 
act on the matter of judicial crime. That same crime is clearly being 
protected generally by the police in what appears to be an unwritten law. It 
is therefore an illegal law being used by them.



My home and land was taken from me as a result of the crimes carried out 
against me, some of which I have detailed here to you, which ensured that 
situation. It is not my intention to beg for what is rightfully mine and 
which has been stolen from me. The UK justice system is without doubt now in 
a situation where it is more akin to an injustice system and accountable to 
no one. I don't think that I need to write here what I believe will 
eventually happen because of that. History is the best indicator.



I copy a letter written to me by Mr Benny Stone of the Court Service Unit 
dated 21st October 2003. You will see their absolute reluctance to act on 
these matters. But that has made their authority to act questionable in the 
process? This is of course the same Court Service which the Durham County 
Court had alleged that they had passed on to my damages claim made against 
it. To remind you of what I wrote earlier, after many months had passed I 
contacted the Court Service who told me that they had no record of my case 
having been passed to them by the Durham Country Court.



I also copy a letter to you a letter which I received from Mr Andrew Clark 
of The Home Office in what he has written is in response regarding 
Freemasonry and the Police Service. It is dated 28th October 2003. You will 
again see that the Home Office is denying any responsibility to act on the 
matters I have reported to you.



Mr Fraser Kemp MP, Barroness Scotland of the Lord Chancellors Department, 
The Attorney General and the Parliamentary Commissioner, and indeed the Home 
Office were, according to Mr Fraser Kemp MP, all sent a copy dossier of 
evidence showing evidence of my allegations against those I have named here. 
I am sure that he too was surprised at their response to him having supplied 
that evidence by their clear failure to act on it. I am accusing the 
Establishment of being deeply involved in trying to cover up its own crimes. 
I am also well aware now that there are those who are capable of and 
consenting to my murder to achieve my silence on these matters. I am not 
deterred by that.




I suffered a heart attack while looking for somewhere to live following the 
seizure of my home.  That had also followed the attempt to murder me at the 
time police stormed my home. I realise now the possibility of a further 
heart attack occurring and this more so because of the stress which I remain 
subjected to by the failure of any authority whatsoever to carry out their 
public duty to act on these matters. Those same authorities who are well 
known by the many victims of judicial crime and misconduct of playing a sort 
of game of frustration. These are just some of my reasons not to remain 
silent or give in to what has become tyrannical powers now at work in the 
UK.  When judges are no longer answerable to Parliament for their crime, as 
is the situation now, this leads our country into a very dangerous stage of 
its history. My natural instinct is to fight the Establishment crime I am 
subjected to rather than give way to it. If I have to die in that cause then 
so be it. The evil people I have named to you will ultimately be called to 
answer for their crimes whether I am dead or alive. I do not request a 
Public Inquiry into these matters. I think it appropriate in the 
circumstances which I have detailed to you that I am right to demand one.



Perhaps from information given to me you should look more into the Operation 
Ore list and see how many of them are members of the Freemasons. Perhaps it 
would also be useful to find out how many judges and police officers are 
included on that list and who amongst them are still employed in the Public 
Service where no action against them has been taken either. William Hamilton 
the Dunblane child mass murderer was also a known mason. There is little 
doubt that his involvement in that matter is still cause for alarm to many 
over the one hundred year clamp down on news of the matter of his massacre 
at Dunblane.





Signed by me Maurice Kellett



Of:



Address withheld for the purposes of this e-mailing only.



On this 11th day of November 2003.



C.C. All interested parties and publication to the general public.



Tony Blair and Home Secretary David Blunkett continue to ignore the matters 
of serious crime contained in letters to them. By ancient law, they are held 
to be guilty of the crimes carried out against me as if they had personaly 
carried them out themselves. When people such as Blair ande Blunkett in such 
public positions, can and do ignore such matters which have included the 
murder attempts made on me, then we do indeed have a very serious situation 
existing in the UK. Can and should we recognise any authority that they 
claim to have given such circumstances as I give here and backed up by a 
mass of evidence supporting it.?



Latest News.



Prime Minister Tony Blair and Home Secretary David Blunkett were informned 
several times last year of the mass of establishment crime carried out 
against me after I first confronted UK Freemasonry  following an illegal 
Houghton-le-Spring  Magistrates court back in 1986 backed up and assisted by 
the Lord Chancellors Department. They were also informed of the murder 
attempt made on me by Northumbria Police Special Squad officers (Murder 
Squad in fact) in early February 2003. Earlier this year I was told by what 
I believe was good authority that Tony Blair is in fact a member of the 
Freemasons. My visits to his usual pub at Sedgefied when in the area, had 
helped me realise this anyway.  Little wonder now why he readily accepted 
that Freemasonry was not a Secret Society but a Society with Secrets when he 
became PM! They are in fact both of these things. Queen Elizabeth II is 
Patron  Head of UK Freemasonry, the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of 
Wales are also Freemasons. Nearer my former home at 16A The Lyons, 
Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, one which I will eventually take back if that be 
my last and final act, the Grand Master for the Durham Masonic Lodges is 
Lord Barnard of Raby Castle, near Barnard Castle. The Duke of Kent the 
Queens relative and a member of the Royal Family, is of course the Grand 
Master of UK Freemasonry. In fact the whole of the UK establishment is bound 
up with the Secret Society of Freemasonry from senior police officers and 
judges to many Town Councillors and Members of Parliament. The former name 
of Freemasonry was the Knights Templars of the Holy Wars against Islam 
Infamy. My ancestors, the Bruce Clan of Scotland, had fought alongside them 
at the battle of Bannockburn against the English with an astonishing 
victory. Robert the Bruce was the protector of the Knights Templars when 
they were being executed as heritics by the Pope and Catholic Church. Many 
of the Knights Templars came to Scotland then and hence the reason why so 
many Freemasons still reside in Scotland up until this present time.



The Queen's Honours List may well be one of the ways used to help maintain 
the British Monarchy. How many such people though can be really be declared 
as being honourable? The Judicial Oath of Fairness to All Manner of Men, 
sworn by all judges and magistrates to the Queen is a fraud. I wrote to her 
about three years ago asking if she bore any responsibility whatsoever to 
act on the matter of judicial crime in the UK. The reply that I received to 
my letter showed that she does not accept any responsibility when judges 
breach their Judicial Oath and further that the UK does not have any 
independent or impartial tribunals or authorities as required under Article 
6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. If the Judicial Oath had any 
meaning whatsoever I would not have subject to so much judicial and indeed 
police crime helping to back it  up. Former recorder John H Fryer-Spedding 
was forefront in putting the final criminal touches to my cases DH400950, 
DH00898 and NE401650. He agreed that it was his intension to deprive me of 
my rights after carrying out a mass of blatant crimes against me that 
perverted the course of justice. This fact is verified by his own approved 
transcript of judgement.  A summary investigation shows that it had been 
Spedding's prior intent to carry out those acts against me. Spedding claimed 
that he was not a Freemason but I have found that Freemasons are most often 
consistent liars when upholding the evils acts of Freemasonry.



In 2002 Spedding was given an award by Queen Elizabeth II and I wonder now 
whether he got it from the Queen in that position, or whether he got if from 
her as Patron Head of UK Freemasonry? By now, Spedding should have been 
serving out a long prison sentence for what he carried out against me 
instead of having been given an award by the Patron Head of UK Freemasonry 
and living his life of luxury at his Stately Home near Keswick, Cumbria, 
costing the public a fee to view. He has served as a significant part of the 
truth that our Justice System, or rather lack of it, is just as corrupt as 
there is anywhere in the world, with judges and police officers are all 
playing their part in such injustice being carried out against members of an 
unsuspecting UK general public. Police generous pensions, early retirement 
age, and the likes, all play a part in helping maintain our corrupt system 
of evil justice by buying off the silence of would be establishment whistle 
blowers who are fully aware of what is taking place right across the present 
day UK.



It was Lords Woolf and Bingham, allegedly two top authorities on UK Law, 
who maintained in my case, that my concerns about probable Masonic influence 
in my cases had no relevance. They were both wrong. Any litigant who 
believes that a court may not be impartial or independent in a case before a 
court, and such court ignores the litigants concern relative to it, that is 
an automatic breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. 
I cannot think for a moment that Woolf and Bingham were not aware of this as 
proved since by case law under what is often referred to as the Dundee 
Tribunal case. No I believe that Woolf and Bingham were most likely 
protecting Freemasonry which is the Old Boys Club of  our generally very 
corrupt system of injustice. Stitch ups, lies deceit and even murder are all 
a part of their tools.



A decision was upheld by the UK Court Service that no judges at the Durham 
County Court were required to declare any membership of Freemasonry as I had 
required of them. They too were wrong about this again because of the Dundee 
Tribunal case ruling. Durham County Court has received my claim for damages 
made against it for the crime carried out and used against me by some of its 
judges that contributed to nothing short of a massive perversion of the 
course of justice. They too continue to ignore my claim made against them. 
However, who pulls the strings for the staff of the Court Service? The age 
old saying "Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here" was never more applicable as 
in my case when I entered the Durham County Court then wrongly  believing 
that the administration of justice was their purpose as paid for from the 
public purse. I had in fact entered into a den of Masonic thieves and 
criminals backed up by an even higher den of  thieves and criminals we call 
our authorities. No man should ever accept such people as having lawful 
authority. The authority of criminals is no authority whatsoever and they 
must be treated and looked upon in this way if things are to get better not 
worse as they now are.



I feel the need here to include the money laundering now being carried on by 
our corrupt establishment. Land Registries are now known to be all a part of 
it. The Chief Registrar of the Durham District Land Registry, a man I am 
also satisfied is a Freemason and I have a tape recording of an interview 
with him that helps back this up, has ignored fraud used to make an illegal 
entry on its Register relative to my cases. He has also ignored reported 
forgery to him relative to my home and land. This is what Freemasonry is all 
about. The Chief Registrar told me that he has the power of discretion. That 
discretion has been used to protect criminals in my case and I have to 
wonder just how many more such similar cases exist?



As a further example of just how evil these people are, My brother, William, 
a Pittington Village New Labour Councillor, was until quite recently Leader 
of the Durham City Council. He denies being a mason but like many masons 
that I am aware of, he is shown to be a liar. Since February 2003 he has led 
me on to believe that he had instructed a solicitor to get back my home at 
16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. This has now been proved to have 
been a lie and he is thus implicated in serious fraud. He was recently 
served with my claim for £17.000 of my missing personal possessions in which 
he is implicated. He had previouly made sure that I did not even have a bed 
to lie on when my home was stolen. I witnessed him stealing some of what 
little was left of my personal possessions when he hid some of them in one 
of his garages at his home which he had previously claimed contained none. 
Yes, brother William, who has gone all over Europe on Council Exchange 
visits without the need for help, claims that he cannot walk unassisted when 
in fact he does this all the time. He of course claims full state benefits 
for his alleged dissability, car and all. I am aware now that facts show 
that masons are often given full State Benefits when they have no 
entitlement to them whatsoever. It sickens me further when I learned that 
brother William told my father not long before his death, that he was not a 
member of the Freemasons. In 2000 when I asked him and his wife to look 
after what was our remaining pet dog named Trish, when I was on the run from 
part of our Masonic ruling mob. On my return home some of my personal 
possessions were missing and Trish had a swollen stomach. William agreed 
that he had stolen my possesions which included documents relative to my 
cases, those sent to me from fellow establishment victims, and proof of my 
allegations made against our corrupt establishment generally. It was certain 
afterwards that at least some of those documents ended up somewhere in the 
Durham Grand Lodges of Freemasonry. William had also been giving Trish food 
which needed water to be added to it before feeding it to her. He had been 
giving it to her in dry form and when she drank water after eating it, it 
swelled up in her stomach. He and his wife had kept dogs for a long time and 
it is without a shadow of doubt that he would have known what affect his 
feeding Trish in that way would have had on her. Shortly afterwards I had to 
have Trish destroyed which greatly upset me further. I have since been led 
to understand that a mason can declare the harm that he has done to someone 
who is considered by them as being anti-Masonic, before a Masonic ceremony I 
was told was called the Point of Polaris. Maybe brother William got some 
extra Masonic browny points for the harm he then caused me. The more recent 
damage that he has caused to me might even allow him even more such points? 
Brother William has only motivated me even further, if this was possible, to 
expose Freemasonry for what it all too ofen is in reality. It is an evil 
cult carried on by mostly very evil people many who clearly need psychiatric 
treatement given the ridiculous rituals they adhere to in Masonic Halls. 
Their evil has no boundaries as I have learned to my sorrow throughout since 
1986 when I then first ran up against them following the illegal 
Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court backed up and protected by what I 
accept amounts to a Masonic Mafia Division named the Lord Chancellors 
Department..



I make this plea to the people of the UK nation. Before you cast a vote for 
any Town Councillor, Member of Parliament or any such similar or associated 
positions of authority, please try to find out if that person yopu might 
vote for is a member of the Freemasons. Criminality and Freemasonry go hand 
in hand with one another. Helping to elect a Freemason into a position of 
authority is also electing a criminal or prospective criminal into such 
position. Huge numbers of such people already in authority are in fact 
already known to be Freemasons. For those of you who may not be sure what 
Freemasonry is all about, it is to be likened to a gang of criminals no 
less. This gang of criminals now rules the UK right up to and from the 
places that I have previously mentioned.



I have made a damages claim against Tony Blair in the sum of £5.000000 for 
his failure to have set in motion the necessary procedures to have set up 
such independent tribunals or authorities as Article 6(1) of the European 
Human Rights Convention requires. Like the other facts that I have made 
known to him, he simply ignores it. Blair's failure to implement such 
independent or impartial  tribunals or authorities is a blatant denial of 
the rights of all UK citizens.



One of my web sites at: www.//mason-rule.bizhosting.com has been hacked and 
some evidence of my allegations removed from it. My password to that site 
has also been hacked and changed clearly so that I cannot replace that 
evidence removed from it. A copy letter received from Blair's pal, Fraser 
Kemp MP, who wrote to me that he was not permitted to raise issues in the 
House of Commons!!!??? was part of the evidence published on it. I hope to 
put this situation right in the near future. Several of my former websites 
have been taken down and this has taken place with the certain influence of 
our very corrupt establishment. It will be seen on the latter website that 
my e-mail address is given as maurice.kellett@ntlworld.com  that address is 
no longer valid since ntlworld removed me from their service earlkier this 
year. One of my other e-mail addresses is:  bliarblair@yahoo.com



Best wishes to all.



TOGETHER WE CAN DEFEAT OUR MASONIC INFESTED EVIL ESTABLISHMENT AND HELP 
BRING ABOUT A FAIRER AND BETTER BRITAIN FOR ALL.



Maurice Kellett.




The Prime Minister

Mr Tony Blair

10 Downing Street

London  SW1A 2AA.



STATEMENT OF TRUTH.



The Statements that I the undersigned, Maurice Kellett,  make herein below 
are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.



In 1986 in learned of crime that was being carried on at the then North East 
UK National Coal Board Estates Department, at Spennymoor, Co Durham. I was 
affected by it and pressed the matter with the management. Facts suggested 
that at least one of them was involved with it. After I would not drop the 
matter I was battered and then struck by a car that was deliberately driven 
at me by a man named Robert Willis Gardner Pringle. That same night 
Northumbria Police officers left me with no choice but to crawl most of the 
five or so miles to my home in the middle of the night during torrential 
rain. I was bleeding heavily from my injuries and the police doctor had no 
bandages whatsoever to help stem that. Police refused me hospital treatment. 
When I arrived home that morning a doctor attended me and confirmed that I 
had required it. He made a diagram of the injuries to my body that remains 
on my medical notes.



The First Use Of Crime Carried Out Against Me By Houghton-le-Spring, 
Tyne-Wear, Magistrates Court.



The matter detailed above went to Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Magistrates 
Court, UK. One of the sitting magistrates, Mr. William Moseley, in regular 
attendance at Hetton-le-Hole Masonic Hall, was a very close acquaintance of 
Pringle and I too had been friendly with him having obtained him work for 
his garage business. The case was dismissed by the court. When I approached 
Mr Moseley at his home on that same evening, he claimed that he had stood 
down from judgement in the Pringle affair. That despite it now being known 
that magistrates generally get several days prior warning of cases listed to 
be heard before them Much later a police officer told me that the Houghton 
Magistrates Court proceedings had been illegal. He said that that the 
remaining sitting magistrate, who had sat with Moseley on the bench,  had no 
qualifications to act alone. The fact of that has of late again been 
confirmed by a senior police officer. The manager of that court, a Mr 
Bavidge and the Lord Chancellors Department were parties to ignoring and 
attempting to cover up of the matter of those illegal Magistrates Court 
Proceedings. I have continued to pursue it without success. Northumbria 
Police have done their utmost to avoid investigating that matter throughout 
the years since.





First Durham County Court Serious Crime Used Against me.

Deputy District Judge Baird,  November 1993.



In November of 1993 I and on behalf of my wife, Joyce Kellett, appealed at 
the Durham County Court in the matter of a judgement made by District Judge 
Scott-Phillips. It related to damage to our property following a vehicle 
collision with it. My appeal against District Judge Scott-Phillips ruling 
was heard by Deputy District Judge Baird who refused it. I learned that a 
Deputy District Judge is not permitted by law to hear any appeal. Eventually 
the Durham County Court admitted that fact. That admission came only after I 
had pressed the matter with the Court and it had clearly attempted to cover 
up it up. When it was clear to the Court that I would not let the matter go, 
the Court wrote that my appeal had been heard by the wrong judge in error. 
That was a lame excuse. All judges and indeed solicitors generally, are well 
aware that it is illegal for a Deputy District Judge, as Baird was, to hear 
any Appeal. It was eventually lawfully heard by a Circuit Judge who upheld 
it. Deputy District Judge Baird had in the circumstances, carried out a 
serious crime against me by unlawfully hearing my Appeal. It was clear 
afterwards that in that matter, It had been heard before a man who had 
carried out serious judicial criminal deception against me. It is also 
considered that the crime of Misconduct in Public Office is also of 
relevance. No action was taken on that matter by either the Durham County 
Court or any of the relevant Authorities that I reported it to. Those 
Included Durham Constabulary who were later to refuse to accept any evidence 
concerning serious crime that had been carried out by Miss Shirley Carr, 
Solicitor Alison Stott and the Durham District Land Registry.



Newcastle County Court March 1994.



Deputy District Judge Baird.



In March of 1994 I was accused by my next door neighbour, Miss Shirley Carr, 
of 16 the Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, who was employed as a National 
Insurance Investigator, of being a trespasser on land which both I and my 
father had been in possession of for over twenty seven years. The original 
owner of it could not and never was traced. There was no adverse claim made 
against us throughout that full period of our occupation. In accordance with 
the Law we had in those circumstances become the lawful owners of it. The 
first hearing of my alleged trespass on that land was before Deputy District 
Judge Baird. I had of course previously exposed him, as detailed above, for 
his previous use of Criminal Deception which he had used against me. 
Unfortunately I had not recognised or associated him at that time as being 
the same criminal judge who had been primarily involved with my appeal at 
Durham County Court a few months earlier. Though I was in need of her 
assistance in the judges chambers, D.J. Baird refused my wife access to 
them. They were situated at the Newcastle County Court. He allowed Carr two 
representatives or advocates into his Chambers. One of them was Professor 
Kenny, who was said to be a regular contributor to The Law Society Journal. 
He would have been well aware that by speaking on the case as Baird had 
invited him to do was to say the least very improper. He had also paid Carr 
a visit at her home one Sunday afternoon which was not within the normal 
working ours of his employment. Both were employed at the University of 
Northumbria Law Clinic. Carr was in those circumstances unlawfully allowed 
the use of two advocates. DDJ Baird ignored my irrefutable evidence provided 
to him that I had not been a trespasser and ruled in the favour of Carr. DDJ 
Baird had shown in November 1992 that he was guilty of Criminal Deception. 
Having a second crack of the whip to pay me back for exposing his crime 
would all appear to fit in with his character.



Shirley Carr has never been able to substantiate what is shown to have been 
her false allegation that I, or indeed my father in the circumstances, were 
trespassers on the land in question. She simply had no entitlement  to the 
land whatsoever. Recorder John H Fryer Spedding ruled that fact in October 
1996. That despite his numerous acts, many of which are evidenced by his own 
approved transcript of judgement, were clearly meant to pervert the course 
of justice. A summary examination by anyone with even slight legal expertise 
would be able to confirm that. Despite that ruling, The Chief Registrar of 
the Durham District Land Registry ignored that ruling and unlawfully allowed 
Carr to register our land subject of Newcastle County Court case NE401650 
into Carr's name. Following my meeting with Mr Timothy late last year (2002) 
I am satisfied that he too is a mason.



In March 1994 I took out a civil action against Carr at the Durham County 
Court. That followed her refusal to name the people who had carried out the 
re-roofing of her property in late 1993 (Durham County Court case No: 
DH400898.) That work had been commenced on a Saturday morning and had been 
completed by the following Sunday evening. What was the reason that work was 
done on a weekend?  They had caused damage to our house during that work and 
had also refused to identify themselves to us so that the normal course of 
law could be pursued. I also took out an action for damage being caused to 
our property following steps having been taken by Carr to ensure that our 
property received drainage coming from her adjoining property (Durham County 
Court case DH400950). It had no drainage facilities at the rear of it. It is 
clear that she had purchased that property at a reduced price because it had 
no working drains on it. My Durham County Court cases No. DH400950 and 
DH400898 along with Carr's Newcastle County case No. NE401650 continued. On 
June 1st 1994 Shirley Carr's application to the Durham County Court for 
consolidation of the cases into her case NE401650 was heard before District 
Judge Scott-Phillips. He refused her application and Ordered that the above 
cases could not be subject of consolidation. His Order was never subject of 
Appeal and stood at the time Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged 
that the cases had been subject of consolidation. Then he unlawfully tried 
them that way as a consolidated case under Carr's case No: NE401650. My two 
prosecution cases DH400950, and my defence case in NE401650 had been 
prepared under the Order made on the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation, 
mentioned above, of the cases. In the event, my case notes were of little 
use. However, recorder John H Fryer Spedding had warned me that my pointing 
out to him that Carr had commenced to swear perjury will she was under my 
cross examination, would do me no good. He also agreed that it was his 
intention to deprive me of my rights. The latter statement is agreed in his 
approved transcript of judgement. It is not difficult to see from the 
available catalogue of events, details of which are all readily available, 
that he had the prior intention that I would be his victim.





The authorities who were made aware of that criminal act by Spedding, along 
with a catalogue of his other crimes used to defeat my cases, ignored it. As 
a further example of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's perversion of the 
course of justice, he said that my right of way across the garden purchased 
by Carr had come to an end because that right had not been reserved in the 
conveyance of it to Carr. One of the most commonly used sections of law used 
in the conveyance of property is Section 62 of The Law of Property Act 1925 
where included in it is all rights, easements, appurtenances,  privileges 
etc. etc. are deemed to be conveyed with a property unless specifically 
revoked in it. That had not happened. Indeed the opposite was true because 
the vendors of that property had been my own parents. My father swore an 
affidavit agreeing the fact that our right of way was not revoked. That was 
only one part of the large amount of evidence that Spedding ignored. 
Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding also falsely alleged that we had required a 
thirty year term to obtain a title by adverse possession of the land subject 
of case NE401650. That was only another of his many lies. Only the twelve 
year period was in question and we had well exceeded that term anyway.





Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was alleged to have been a judge with 
Chancery experience. I cannot think that such experience which had allowed 
him to make such untrue statements, had come from any Court of Law that I 
know of.  Spedding agreed these statement in his approved transcript of 
judgement. Video evidence taken at the time our land subject of case 
NE401650 was fenced from the garden owned by Carr was shown to Spedding. His 
statements regarding what was shown in it bore nothing whatsoever to the 
truth of what he was shown in it. Newcastle County Court refused me access 
to the tape recordings made at the kangaroo court held by Spedding there in 
October 1996. That served as evidence of their part in the attempted cover 
up of Spedding's crime used against me.  People who ignored these facts and 
many others showing Spedding's crimes included  Lord Justices Auld and Pill, 
The Court Service, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the 
Attorney General. This has clearly been a situation where Establishment 
crime was, and remains as being protected by yet more Establishment crime. 
The fact that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had  consistently lied and that 
is shown and proved by his own approved transcript of judgement, there is no 
doubt. His reasons for having done that to me remains in some doubt. 
However, I am sure that it had been his reward for me having contributed to 
the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry 
within the Police and judiciary ( Nolan Inquiry).



I obtained from Sunderland Local Authority substantial evidence that Carr 
had sworn very material perjury in her court submissions in the matter of 
case DH400950. Then she applied for an injunction clearly to deter me from 
seeking and taking further evidence of her crime. The injunction application 
was heard by District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Durham County Court 
in September 1995. D.J. Cuthbertson agreed that solicitor Alison Stott be 
allowed to prepare the draft of joint undertakings agreed between Carr and I 
in general principle. He then adjourned the proceedings without making it 
known when those proceedings were to recommence. In January 1996 solicitor 
Alison Stott declared to the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John 
H Fryer-Spedding that up to that day she had not in fact been acting for 
Carr but had only been assisting her. In those same circumstances alone, as 
Carr's assistant, solicitor Stott was party to criminal deception by failing 
to declare to the Durham County Court she was even at that time only Carr's 
assistant and had not been her advocate. That was not the least of her use 
of crimes against me. I will detail some of the others later in this 
document. Stott's declaration to the Newcastle County Court in January 1996 
mentioned above, was in fact an acknowledge of her serious use of crime. 
That same very serious crime was reported to Durham Constabulary and The 
Office For The Supervision of Solicitors who simply ignored it.



Two days after the injunction hearing before DJ Cuthbertson, my wife and I, 
received a copy of an Order made by DJ Cuthbertson granting all that Carr 
had applied for in her injunction application. I appealed against that 
Order. My Appeal was  again heard by D.J. Cuthbertson who refused it. In the 
circumstances that Appeal too had been illegal. A judge is not permitted by 
law to hear any appeal from his own judgement.  I never accepted the lawful 
validity of DJ Cuthbertson's Order. In June of 1996 I was accused of having 
been in breach of DJ Cuthbertson's injunction Order. Part of his Order was 
that I was not allowed to speak to Carr. After that Order had been granted 
Carr falsely claimed to the  Sunderland Public Health Department that our 
two dogs barked incessantly which was only another of her many lies. Shortly 
after that while sat in our garden, one of our dogs started to bark at 
noises coming from the adjoining fence between Carr's property and our own. 
When it carried on, I put some steps up against the fence and looked over 
it. There I saw Carr with something in her hand and scratching it against 
the fence. In her other hand was a microphone. It was clear even then what 
her intention had been. I called her some appropriate names in my outrage. 
She obviously tape recorded at least part of that. She had however edited 
part of that recording to her advantage. Evidence provided by Carr to the 
Courts, showed that she had secretly tape recorded a conversation between my 
wife and I while we sat in the privacy of our own kitchen. It had been done 
by her placing a microphone up to the open window. In July of 1995 while my 
wife and I had been on holiday, Mr Norman Pringle who lives with Carr, had 
gone into our property and altered guttering on it to allow Carr's property 
drainage to flow more freely onto ours. He agreed that he had done that in 
his affidavit. The results of his work were video filmed when my wife and I 
returned from holiday. In 1996 when my wife and I went on holiday we left a 
video camera pointing down the boundary fence between our property and 
Carr's. It had not been in use anyway as no equipment could record for the 
two weeks unattended while we were away on holiday. It had been meant as a 
deterrent to Pringle against trespassing and altering our property. Circuit 
Judge Helen Paling would I feel sure have been aware of that fact but still 
sentenced me to imprisonment. Later, which I will detail, she was to prove 
to me her unfitness to be a judge.



An application was made in July 1996 by Carr for my imprisonment under her 
allegation that I had breached the injunction as in the above described 
circumstances, which District Judge had granted under what had been illegal 
circumstances.  I was found guilty of that allegation at Newcastle Crown 
Court by Circuit Judge Helen Paling and then sentenced to three months 
imprisonment at Durham. There I had a stroke and was released on appeal. My 
sentence was then suspended.



At the outset of the cases and around late June 1994, a solicitor by the 
name of Nancy Bone practising from Durham, made an application for Legal Aid 
for us. It was refused on the grounds that insufficient information had been 
given to the Legal aid Board by her. Bone then asked us for over two 
thousand pounds for having made that application. I would not pay it. In 
fact there had never been any mention whatsoever by Bone of any costs for a 
Legal Aid application. Then she withheld all of my files by lien. I made an 
application to the Durham County Court which was heard before DJ 
Scott-Phillips, that I be allowed to visit the Offices of Bone to take 
copies from my files to allow me to proceed. He granted that Order. Bone 
breached it and was in those circumstances guilty of Contempt of Court.  She 
had locked me out of her offices. I contacted the Durham County Court and 
was told that DJ Scott-Phillips had not granted such Order. The Court 
manager. Mr I Cuthbertson said that DJ Scott-Philips had told him that my 
visit to Bone's office had only been by her agreement. That was a lie but I 
could not prove it then. Around two years after the final hearing of the 
cases before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding, Bone was struck from the 
Register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct in other people's cases. Another 
solicitor returned my files that Bone had withheld. They included copies of 
letters that she had sent to the Durham County Court. In them she had 
referred to my visit to her office as being by Order of the Court. That was 
proof that the Court and/or DJ Scott-Phillips had lied about the matter and 
had protected solicitor Bone from a probable Contempt of Court conviction.



On the 1st June 1994 District Judge Scott-Phillips at the Durham County 
Court Ordered that the three cases mentioned above, DH400950, DH400898 and 
NE401650 between Carr and I could not be subject of consolidation into one 
case. Solicitor Alison Stott had been going into court with Carr from late 
June 1994. In 1995 she took on the work of preparing the judges bundles 
ready for trial. She secretly passed on that work for Carr to carry out 
herself. In October 1996 recorder John H Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that 
the cases had been subject of consolidation.  Despite my protests he went 
ahead and tried them as a single action. After three days he ruled that I 
was to pay five sixth of all costs. His approved transcript of Judgement 
still serves as substantial evidence that it had been his prior intent to 
pervert the course of justice. I have published it along with my replies to 
it in Statement of Truth format. During the proceedings, he had warned me 
against highlighting to him that Carr was swearing perjury during my cross 
examination of her. Her contradictions of previous statements made on oath 
proved that fact. He said it would do me no good. About a week later I 
reported recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's crime to then Lord Chancellor 
Mackay. Spedding  then went into what was shown to been a sudden decision to 
retire. When Carr had prepared the judges bundles, without the knowledge or 
consent of the Durham County Court, she later agreed that she had 
deliberately left out documents which she said as not being important. One 
of them was the Order made on the 1st June 1994 refusing her application for 
consolidation of the three actions that had, in the circumstances 
unlawfully, been heard before  recorder Spedding as a single action. In any 
event, he was required by Supreme Court rules to have seen a copy of the 
alleged Order for consolidation of the cases. There was none, only the Order 
refusing consolidation of the cases. I had prepared my two prosecution cases 
and one defence case as per the Order of the 1st June 1994  refusing 
consolidation of the cases. At what was a kangaroo court presided over by 
recorder Spedding I was thrown into complete disarray.



I sought leave to appeal recorder Spedding's judgement at the London High 
Court. It was heard before Lord's Justices Auld and Pill. I supplied them 
with a huge amount of evidence showing  evidence of the injustice that I was 
deliberately being subjected to. I also supplied them with a copy of the 
Order made by District Judge Scott-Phillips at Durham on 1st June 1994 
refusing Carr's application for consolidation of the three cases. That alone 
should have been sufficient for granting my application for leave to appeal. 
They refused it. In 1996/97 I had contributed to the House of Commons Home 
Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and 
Judiciary. It was common knowledge I had done that. I was still at that time 
in correspondence with Lord Nolan on matters concerning Freemasonry and that 
continued until January of 1998. He wrote then telling me that he was 
returning to being a Member of the Law Lords. Lord Justice Auld spent a 
large amount of the time they had allocated for my application in an attempt 
to persuade me the possibility of Masonic involvement in the injustice that 
had been dealt out was unlikely.  I wrote to LJ Auld and Pill afterwards. I 
asked that Lord Justice Auld and Pill having spent so much time on the 
matter of my concerns regarding Freemasonry would they in those 
circumstances agree their having any membership of Freemasonry. The letter I 
received from their secretary was that they did not enter into 
correspondence with litigants who had been before them. In fact their 
failure to make such denial or admission of Masonic membership was a breach 
of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.



Solicitor Alison Stott practising from Durham, had been attending the Durham 
County Court from around late June 1994. In January 1996 she declared to the 
Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer Spedding that she 
had not been acting for Carr but had only been assisting her. There were 
witnesses to her declaration and affidavits sworn relative to it. Spedding 
replied to her that she was either acting for Carr or she was not. Her reply 
was that, "well I am now sir". As Carr's assistant Stott had no legal 
authority for work that she had been given by the Court in the matter of the 
injunction application against me in 1995 which had imprisoned me in 1996. 
Neither did she have any authority to take on the work of preparing the 
judges bundle or indeed its authority to pass that work on for Carr to carry 
out. Last year 2002, Durham County Court agreed following their search of 
the files, there was no authority on record to allow solicitor Stott to 
prepare the judges bundle. That of course had also been true of the 
situation relative to Shirley Carr. That these two people had been guilty of 
serious crime there is no doubt whatsoever. The mass of evidence showing 
that still remains.



 In March 1999 I was made bankrupt at the Durham County Court in the sum of 
£15.800. Included in the bankruptcy costs were solicitor Stott's costs 
throughout which included the time period that she was, as she had declared 
in January 1996, was only Carr's assistant. My bankruptcy costs, having been 
engineered on a bed of crime, some of which is described here, included 
solicitor Stott's costs as if she had in fact been acting as Carr's advocate 
rather than her assistant as she had previously declared. That amounted to 
fraud under the Theft Act. That still needs to be investigated. Durham 
Constabulary are aware of that fraud but have refused to take any action on 
it. Those who have made that decision are in those circumstances shown to be 
liable for prosecution under the Regina-v-Dytham case, for Misconduct in 
Public Office. They are also held to be liable for other action. Facts and 
evidence showing that the final hearing of the cases before John H 
Fryer-Spedding had been illegal by virtue of the 1st June 1994 Order 
refusing consolidation of the cases. That too was also ignored by the 
bankruptcy court as it had also been by Lords Justices Auld and Pill. My 
appeal against that bankruptcy was refused by Mr Peter Leaver QC at the 
London Appeal Court. He said that he had no interest in the evidence that I 
had supplied to him which showed the sea of fraud used to engineer my 
bankruptcy. Part of it included the 1st June 1994 Order by the Durham County 
Court refusing consolidation of the cases. Mr Leaver said that he had no 
interest in that evidence only whether the actual bankruptcy proceedings had 
been legal. He added another two thousand pounds costs on for my bankruptcy 
appeal. Attending that appeal was Shirley Carr, solicitor Stott and 
barrister Mr Richard Merritt acting for Carr. Merrit had been aware that the 
cases had unlawfully been heard as a consolidated action before recorder 
John H Fryer-Spedding. He had in fact corrected his defence and prosecution 
case submission reflecting that fact  when that point had been made to known 
to solicitor Stott by my solicitor Mrs P. Tench a few weeks earlier. In 
those circumstances solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merrit are 
further implicated in the crime/misconduct used against me. It would appear 
at the very least that their obligations to the duties of their profession 
and to their duties as Officers of the Courts were ignored to the point that 
was a criminal act.



In the matter of the land subject of my alleged trespass, solicitor Stott 
was in receipt of evidence that another solicitor, Mr Paul Graney, also 
since struck from the register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct in other 
peoples cases, had sworn perjury in a Statutory Declaration which had been 
used to lodge a caution on the land subject of the trespass case at the 
Durham District Land Registry ( NE401650). She failed, indeed refused to 
make that information known to the land Registry. Northumbria and Durham 
Constabulary ignored those matters even after solicitor Graney had sworn an 
affidavit agreeing that the information he had sworn in his Statutory 
Declaration used to register a caution at HM Land Registry had been untrue. 
Evidence by means of his own letters which came to light had proved that 
fact anyway. That evidence was shown to detective sergeant McGann and 
detective constable Storey at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. 
They falsely claimed that swearing perjury was not a police matter.



Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding ruled that Carr had no entitlement to a 
possessory title to the land subject of my alleged trespass under case 
NE401650. Despite that, Mr Patrick Timothy Chief registrar of the Durham 
District Land Registry, who was provided with a copy of that ruling, ignored 
it despite my protests. He unlawfully allowed the land subject of that 
matter to registered into Carr's name. I, and my father (since deceased) 
still have lawful title to that land despite it having been stolen from me 
by none other than crime as a mass of evidence shows.



My father had taken an action at the Durham County Court to go back onto 
possession of the land sunject of case NE401650. Recorder John H Fryer 
Spedding had ruled, and that is included in his approved transcript of 
judgement, that my father was the most likely person to have title to it. 
His application was heard before District Judge Cuthbertson.  D.J. 
Cuthbertson ruled that my fathers application was an abuse of court time and 
then dismissed it. My father appealed that ruling. I represented him at the 
Sunderland County Court. The judge in that matter was Circuit Judge Helen 
Paling. She was the judge who had previously sentenced me to three months 
imprisonment at Durham for alleged Contempt of Court. At the outset of the 
hearing she told me to be quiet and then dismissed my father's appeal 
without my being able to present it on his behalf. My father ran from the 
courtroom when I became subject of nothing short of a verbal onslaught from 
CJ Helen Paling. The court usher had expressed concern about his safety 
following that. I wrote to the Lord Chancellor about that matter. CJ Paling 
made an excuse then which effectively said that it had been a mistake. It 
could not have been a mistake and that matter was never corrected by the 
Court. My fathers health went downhill. He collapsed and died two days after 
my bankruptcy was published front page on the local Press in April 1999. The 
publication had also included that I was thereafter barred from being a Town 
Councillor by virtue of that bankruptcy ruling. He had been very upset at 
the whole affair and that was considered by a family member as being a 
contributory factor in his death.



I had been accused by Carr of approaching her at the Sunderland County Court 
and threatening  harassment of her. Her accusation had been made relative to 
the day my fathers appeal case should have been heard by CJ Paling at the 
Sunderland County Court. That allegation and another she had made against me 
had also been untrue. I was found guilty of  Carr's allegation at 
Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates court and received a huge fine with costs. It 
was that same Court who had previously carried out serious crime against me 
by its illegal proceedings in 1986 mentioned above. That was a matter which 
I had never let go of. It was at that time that I became sure that members 
of Freemasonry had been involved in that. My appeal against that conviction 
was refused. Judge Moir and two lay magistrates sitting at the Newcastle 
Combined Courts, had been informed a week earlier that I would require that 
they declare any membership of Freemasonry. After around a half hour 
adjournment, Judge Moir said that they would not make that declaration. 
Following a ruling in 2002, (Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02) their 
judgement in that matter as in the cases detailed here, is shown to have 
been a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. While 
I had asked that that the barrister then acting for me, Mr Neil Addison, 
require that same declaration from the judges sitting at the London Appeal 
Court in that matter, I am unsure now as to whether he had in fact made that 
known to the judges. I have reason to believe that he had not done that and 
that suggests what I know from my  experience to be a general fear of 
mentioning anything to do with Freemasonry in our Courts.



A few months after my Appeal against conviction for alleged harassment of 
Carr, I collected a file from solicitors Harding, Swinburne, Jackson & Co of 
Sunderland. They were the solicitors representing me in my appeal.  They had 
kept my files for a long time after my failed appeal under their allegation 
that they still needed them. Eventually I went to their offices and a clerk 
gave them to me apparently believing it had been agreed that I could collect 
them. When I  examined them at home, there was a copy of a letter written by 
Mr Head, Senior Prosecutor of the Washington, Tyne-Wear Crown Prosecution 
Service. He had written it to my former solicitors, Jackson's of Hartlepool, 
Co. Cleveland. It read that a security officer, a Mr Michael Golding, who 
was on duty in the Sunderland County Court at the time of the allegation 
made against me by Carr and had been spoken to by police. The letter said 
that Mr Golding had told Northumbria Police that nothing of note had 
occurred in the court at the time Carr had made that allegation of my 
threatening harassment  of her. That letter was never submitted in my 
defence evidence in my prosecution or during my appeals against it 
afterwards. Northumbria Police agreed that the evidence of that letter was 
material to my defence and that it had been a criminal act to deliberately 
withhold it from the courts. They agreed to investigate that and other 
matters of crime used against me, including the matter of the illegal 
Houghton Magistrates Court proceedings in 1986. They have never done that. 
They had allegedly appointed an acting Inspector Steve Coxon to deal with 
those matters. Weeks afterward it became very clear to me that all in fact 
he had been doing was acting and nothing else.



I was a New Labour member of Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear,  Town Council. I 
spoke out at Council meetings against four family members, all Easington 
Lane Ward Councillors having failed to declare an interest in the matter of 
land owned by one of them which was subject of Council discussion for 
proposed housing. Instead of declaring an interest and not taking part in 
that discussion, all were part of it and two of them spoke in favour of that 
housing. When I spoke out against their failure to declare that interest at 
a Hetton Council meeting, the Councillor who owned that land stopped me from 
leaving the Council Chambers. Two of his Councillor family members held me 
while I was being pushed back from the door. The Councillor who owned that 
land subject of Council discussion, a member of the Freemasons, then drew 
his arm back in a clear action to deliver a blow to my head. That was 
prevented by Councillor Mr George Wandless who took hold of that man and 
pulled him away from me. I continued to be subject of threats from them. 
Immediately before that Council meeting, I had been asked by that mason 
Councillor if I owned my own home. I replied that I did. He implied that if 
I mentioned their failure to declare an interest in the land mentioned 
above, I might end up not owning it. That is exactly what has happened as a 
result of the serious crime which I have reported to you as Prime Minister 
since you took Office and before in 1997 when you were Leader of the 
Opposition. I made complaint on that matter to Northumbria Police. Inspector 
Williamson was appointed to investigate that matter. He never even 
approached me at all. He declared a few days later that as he did not think 
the rest of the Town Councillors would say what they had witnessed of the 
assault on me and what amounted to my false imprisonment by the Councillors, 
he had decided not to take any action on that matter. That Inspector retired 
several months later. I have good reason to believe that he too was a member 
of the Freemasons.



My wife, myself and our two daughters became subject of a death threat. A 
man said that he would stab us. He went on to say that if we reported that 
matter to Northumbria Police he would repeat that same threat made against 
us to them as well. A Northumbria Police officer was called. He went to see 
the man who did indeed repeat that same death threat made against us to him 
as well. No action was taken on that matter either by Northumbria Police. 
This Mr Prime Minister is the way criminal elements of Freemasonry works and 
there are a large number of other people who can bear witness to that. It is 
only one of the many reasons why all those employed in the public service 
must be compelled to declare any membership of Freemasonry. While I 
understand your government will not do that because of possible violations 
of the European Human Rights Convention under the Privacy Article, by using 
that same argument crime rings too could make that same claim.



In 1999 after further false allegations made by Shirley Carr I was arrested 
and taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear,  Police Station. My request for a doctor 
to attend me was ignored. I requested a solicitor but that too was ignored. 
I asked that someone be informed as to where I was being held. That request 
too was ignored. After around two hours I had breathing difficulties. Only 
when I made a further request that a doctor attend me did the custody 
sergeant telephone one. I was allowed to speak with that doctor on the 
telephone and told him my symptoms and medication that I was undergoing. He 
informed the custody sergeant that I must be taken immediately to hospital. 
Following my admission there and examination, It was confirmed that I had 
been seriously ill. The Police Complaints Authority confirmed afterwards 
that I had been unlawfully arrested and that my continued detainment by 
Northumbria Police has also been unlawful. The PCA letter agreeing that was 
only part of the huge amount of documents now missing following the seizure 
of my home on 5th February 2003.



A man criminally assaulted both my wife and I at our home. He had just 
previously caused criminal damage to our property. When Northumbria Police 
were called to the scene, the man agreed that he had carried out those acts. 
Nothing was heard again from Northumbria Police on that matter as well.



Following having taken part in a radio discussion relative to Freemasonry in 
November of 1997 a man called at our home the following morning. In short he 
suggested that I would never be able to beat Freemasonry for what it is 
known by many to be generally up to. He warned that someone by the name I 
believe was Mr John Coates had been  like me and would not stop voicing his 
concerns about Freemasonry. He went on to say that  his deep freezer 
situated at South Shields, had been burnt down as a result of that. His 
implication was that our home could become subject of similar treatment. In 
January of 1998 my wife and I heard evidence that the threat of having our 
home burnt down was real because a deep freezer business had in fact been 
burnt down at South Shields. I reported that matter to a Northumbria police 
officer and that was also ignored by them. My wife had asked that we sell 
our home and try to flee from the situation. That is never possible where 
Freemasonry in concerned and the reasons for that are numerous.



This type of behaviour by Northumbria Police is all too common to me. Its 
Chief Constable is reputed to be a member of Freemasonry. He had never 
issued any denial of that when I requested he do that in my letters sent to 
him. I am aware of a number of its senior officers also being masons. That 
would follow given that masons are required to give preference to their 
Masonic brothers in the well known oaths that they all make. Freemasonry is 
also known as The Brotherhood which sets them aside all other considerations 
when dealing with them.



In late 2002 a possession Order for my home was made at the Teesside County 
Court in the favour of Carr. My bankruptcy engineered on nothing short of a 
bed of crime, had allowed that situation. It had been my home most of the 
time since 1947. I appealed against it on the 20th January this year (2003) 
at the Teesside County Court. Durham County Court could not hear that matter 
because I have made a damages claim against it for its use of crime against 
me detailed above. They are continuing to ignore it and had previously 
alleged the matter had been referred to the London Court Service to deal 
with. When I contacted them weeks after the Durham County Court allegation 
that it had been referred to them, they told me that they had no record of 
that. I have heard nothing from any of them since that time. Judge 
Mainwaring-Taylor refused my application to set aside the possession Order 
for my home. He had wrongly ruled that my concerns at possible Masonic 
influence in my cases was of no relevance ( Commissioners Case No: 
CSI/136/02).



The Durham County Court quickly arranged my appeal hearing of his ruling. It 
was heard at Teesside County Court on Thursday 30th January this year. I had 
provided the judge, as yet unnamed to me, with a copy of the Commissioners 
Case No: CSI/136/02 . It related to a litigant who also had concerns at 
possible Masonic involvement in his case which a tribunal had ignored. The 
Appeal  ruling was that by failing to instil a feeling of confidence in that 
litigant, it had been an automatic violation to Article 6(1) of the European 
Human Rights Convention and the his appeal was upheld. When the judge at the 
Teesside County of the 30th January started to read that CSI/136/02 ruling 
he was clearly shocked and asked if the solicitor for Carr had seen it. He 
indicated that he had. I took ill very shortly afterwards and the judge 
immediately adjourned the case. I was taken by ambulance to hospital and 
spent some time in a cardiac care ward until late the following day. I had 
provided the judge and Carr's solicitor with the necessary protocols 
required for my application for Judicial Review in my cases. I had also 
provided them with my skeleton argument which the Protocols required. 
Nothing whatsoever was heard from the courts after that.



On Monday 2nd February this year (2003)  a bailiff arrived at my home 
accompanied by Northumbria Police officers. I saw him trying to force entry 
to my home watched by police officers.  I warned them that what he was doing 
was illegal but the bailiff continued to try to force entry to my home. It 
was then that I decided to stay my ground against what had been nothing less 
than the massive use of crime that had brought about that situation. I took 
an ornamental sword used as an ornament and threatened to fall on it if the 
bailiff did not stop trying to force the door to my home. He still continued 
with his attempt to force entry.  I took petrol from a can in my rear garden 
and poured some over me and held an unlighted match close to me. I warned 
that if an entry was made to my home, they would just have to take what they 
would find of me. More police officers arrived. Two police negotiators 
started to talk to me. My telephone and gas supply was turned off by the 
police. I had told one of the police negotiators, a female officer named to 
me as Jo, that I would hand some evidence of my allegations of the crime 
used to bring about that situation to her through my kitchen window. It was 
then that she warned me from going near that window and it was then made 
clear to me that police marksmen had been stationed outside my home and were 
looking for an opportunity to shoot me. Jo told me she would go and have a 
word with them.



Later that Monday evening police cut off my electricity. The next day my 
water supply off. I was able to drink a little that I presume had been left 
in the pipes. I was very sick after drinking it. When I saw the water the 
following morning it was heavily discoloured. On the third night Northumbria 
Police Special Squad officers battered down the door of my home. I stood at 
the top of the stairs of it and was trying to pluck up courage to fall on 
the sword that I held. Two Special Squad officers complete with riot shield, 
visors etc, quickly made their way up the stairs and handcuffed me while 
they were all yelling and screaming presumably to distract me. Two Special 
Squad officers held my shoulders but left my sword between my hands so I 
could not move it. Then they proceeded to make noises that were very clearly 
meant to co-ordinate their pressure on my shoulders while pushing my abdomen 
down onto the sword. Another Special Squad Officer was near to the top of 
the stairs. On seeing what his colleagues were attempting to do to me, he 
grabbed the handcuffs and pulled the sword away then dragged me headlong 
down the stairs away from his colleagues, the two would be murderers. I 
suffered superficial wounds to my abdomen resulting from that murder 
attempt.



I ended up at Sunderland Royal Hospital with a twenty four hour continued 
throughout Northumbria Police guard. The next two days no one was allowed to 
visit me at the hospital. Only when they were warned by someone with legal 
knowledge that what they were continuing to do was also illegal did they 
allow me visitors. However, I was not allowed them without a police officer 
in attendance. One of them confirmed to me that anything that passed in the 
conversation between my visitors and myself  was being noted for possible 
use. Essential medication that I needed and which a police doctor had 
obtained especially for me was never sent to hospital. That caused me 
problems when I ended up taking some wrong medication.



Before the siege of my home  started on 2nd  February, and the just previous 
Teesside County Court proceedings, I had received a letter from your Mr Matt 
Dowding of 10 Downing Street, London. Last year I had forwarded on a damages 
claim made against you for what I consider has been a serious failure in 
what I consider to have been your duty as prime Minister to set in motion 
the necessary mechanism to allow the UK citizen access  to independent and 
impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of 
our criminal and civil rights. That as you will know is a requirement of 
Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. Mr Dowding's letter of 
the 16th January 2003 related to that matter. It read that my letters and 
claim made against you were being passed on to the Lord Chancellors 
Department to deal with. I have not had any communication from that 
Department following that. My claim against you is being revised in an 
upward direction following the events which have taken place in my case over 
this past year. Mr Fraser Kemp MP,  sent had copy bundles of evidence of the 
judicial and other crimes that had been used against me to, The Lord 
Chancellors Department, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner  and 
the Attorney General. None of these authorities accepted any responsibility 
to act on the matter of judicial crime or indeed the evidence showing that. 
Letters that Mr Kemp MP had received from these authorities confirmed that 
fact. I then asked in my letter to Mr Kemp MP if he would raise these 
matters for and in the general public interest in the House of Commons. He 
replied in his  letter that he was not permitted to raise issues in the 
House. That still requires an explanation.



There is absolutely no doubt that had we had such independent authorities 
for me to turn to as required under Article 6(1) of the European Human 
Rights Convention in the matter of the Establishment crime of which I am 
subject, the situation of the seizure of my home in February would not have 
come about. Now it has also been effectively confirmed via Mr Fraser Kemp MP 
that the Judiciary generally have become a law to themselves. This is itself 
a very serious matter in addition to the deprival of our rights of access to 
independent authorities ect, for the resolution of our criminal and civil 
rights as required under the European Human Rights Convention. The question 
that remains is who was it who decided that my murder was a solution to the 
Establishment crime problem? That decision had surely come from high 
authority?



Finally, my wife and I, since divorced after thirty years of marriage, 
purchased a property at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in the sum of £65.000 
cash in late April 1998. That purchase had been made with our money and 
while we were still married and was registered at HM Land Registry in my 
wife's name. I was made bankrupt in March 1999 in the sum of £15.800. I had 
made the Official Receiver situated at Stockton-on-Tees, aware of that 
purchase. According to the law, all financial transactions leading up to a 
bankruptcy for a period of two years are deemed to be taken into 
consideration for the purposes of it. That section of law was ignored in my 
case. After that purchase my wife's own hand written financial accounts 
which she had hidden from me, showed that there was £27.600 remaining after 
that house purchase. In addition, she had used forgery to obtain Land 
Registry registration of our marital home into here sole name at 16A The 
Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, which had previously been registered in our joint 
names. Land which had been registered at the Durham District Land Registry 
in my sole name, became registered again by means of forgery, into my wife's 
sole name. Evidence shows that she had then sold or whatever those assets 
which had been mine to the Trustee in Bankruptcy. The value of those assets 
far exceeds the amount claimed in my bankruptcy even had it been obtained 
without the use of the mass crimes I have again reported to you.



North Yorkshire Police, in whose area my wife had purchased the property at 
Dacre Banks is, refused to act on my allegations regarding that. I 
threatened Mr Kenworthy, the North Yorkshire Chief Constable with citizens 
arrest for failing to carry out his duty on that matter. Only then did he 
send two detectives north to see me at my home at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. 
They saw and took copies of the evidence of my wife's hand written accounts 
and were made aware of the cash house purchase by her at Dacre Banks. That 
purchase had been well within the period relative to bankruptcy. They 
detectives told me that they had sufficient evidence to act  and returned to 
North Yorkshire. Around two weeks later I received a letter from North 
Yorkshire Police saying that there was insufficient evidence to act on my 
allegations. Even a simple check at HM Land Registry would have provided 
sufficient evidence of that £65.000 cash purchase by my wife, let alone the 
rest of it. That was again a clear indication that I was subject of a 
conspiracy which I attribute that to the influence of Freemasonry.



The thread of their very obvious influence remained throughout and had 
started with the illegal Houghton-le-Spring Magistrate Court proceedings in 
1986. The Magistrate, Mr William Moseley, who later claimed he had stood 
down from judgement when I asked him to explain his presence on the bench, 
was in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole, Masonic Hall. Pringle, the man 
who had  battered me and then struck me with his car that he had 
deliberately driven at me, supplied the local Masonic Halls with fruit and 
vegetables for use in their functions.



This is not a full account of what was carried out against me by what has 
undoubtedly  amounted to high level authority crime. It is however I think 
the most substantive. I have been subject of other crime carried out by a 
doctor and police officers where again there was evidence of a thread of 
Freemasonry involved in that as well. Indications are that the problem of 
Masonic membership within the medical profession is also a problem. I had 
been an active supporter of Mr Chris Mullin MP's Private Members, Secret 
Societies Declaration Bill which failed when it was talked out of time in 
the House of Commons several years ago. Later he wrote to me hinting at his 
concern of the number of MP's who were masons. Now it is my understanding 
that Mr Mullin MP pays his Constituency Office rent to the Durham Grand 
Lodge of Freemasonry. Just over a year ago he was forefront in the obtaining 
of a £35.000 public grant for the restoration of one of Sunderland's Masonic 
Halls.



The Court Service has advised that I employ a solicitor to act for me in 
these matters. However, again from my past experience, I have found 
solicitors generally to be involved with matters involving crime and 
misconduct. It is now a well known fact by me following my experience with 
them, and from the experience of many others that the Office For The 
Supervision Of Solicitors is more often involved in covering up legal 
profession crime and misconduct that in protecting the public from it. I 
suggest that is an all too common problem coming from self regulatory 
authorities. They have done that to me now several times. In addition, 
solicitors, being Officers of the Courts, cannot reasonably be claimed to be 
independent or impartial in matters concerning judicial crime. I am also 
very aware of substantial membership of Freemasonry within the legal 
profession generally and that too I know has been a factor involved in my 
situation.



I have previously asked that you have a Public Inquiry into my case. My 
request to you regarding that has not been granted. I am aware that if such 
Inquiry was carried out by those authorities or tribunals as required under 
Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which we simply don't have, it would show that all 
UK citizens and not just myself, have a very serious problem with the denial 
of our rights. Mr Fraser Kemp MP's letters and evidence sent to the various 
authorities I have named show  that the judiciary  is not accountable to the 
public or any authority.



A list of names is being drawn up of those involved in judicial crime who, 
by use of their crimes, have rendered themselves liable to a lawful citizens 
arrest. Such arrest  is extended to all those who fail to carry out their 
considered public duty to act on that crime or to those who try to prevent 
such lawful arrests from taking place.



I again ask that you set in motion the necessary mechanism to set up an 
Independent Inquiry into my case. It is clear from evidence that I have at 
hand that none of what is considered as being the relevant authorities will 
act on the matter of judicial crime. That same crime is clearly being 
protected generally by the police in what appears to be an unwritten law. It 
is therefore an illegal law being used by them.



My home and land was taken from me as a result of the crimes carried out 
against me, some of which I have detailed here to you, which ensured that 
situation. It is not my intention to beg for what is rightfully mine and 
which has been stolen from me. The UK justice system is without doubt now in 
a situation where it is more akin to an injustice system and accountable to 
no one. I don't think that I need to write here what I believe will 
eventually happen because of that. History is the best indicator.



I copy a letter written to me by Mr Benny Stone of the Court Service Unit 
dated 21st October 2003. You will see their absolute reluctance to act on 
these matters. But that has made their authority to act questionable in the 
process? This is of course the same Court Service which the Durham County 
Court had alleged that they had passed on to my damages claim made against 
it. To remind you of what I wrote earlier, after many months had passed I 
contacted the Court Service who told me that they had no record of my case 
having been passed to them by the Durham Country Court.



I also copy a letter to you a letter which I received from Mr Andrew Clark 
of The Home Office in what he has written is in response regarding 
Freemasonry and the Police Service. It is dated 28th October 2003. You will 
again see that the Home Office is denying any responsibility to act on the 
matters I have reported to you.



Mr Fraser Kemp MP, Barroness Scotland of the Lord Chancellors Department, 
The Attorney General and the Parliamentary Commissioner, and indeed the Home 
Office were, according to Mr Fraser Kemp MP, all sent a copy dossier of 
evidence showing evidence of my allegations against those I have named here. 
I am sure that he too was surprised at their response to him having supplied 
that evidence by their clear failure to act on it. I am accusing the 
Establishment of being deeply involved in trying to cover up its own crimes. 
I am also well aware now that there are those who are capable of and 
consenting to my murder to achieve my silence on these matters. I am not 
deterred by that.




I suffered a heart attack while looking for somewhere to live following the 
seizure of my home.  That had also followed the attempt to murder me at the 
time police stormed my home. I realise now the possibility of a further 
heart attack occurring and this more so because of the stress which I remain 
subjected to by the failure of any authority whatsoever to carry out their 
public duty to act on these matters. Those same authorities who are well 
known by the many victims of judicial crime and misconduct of playing a sort 
of game of frustration. These are just some of my reasons not to remain 
silent or give in to what has become tyrannical powers now at work in the 
UK.  When judges are no longer answerable to Parliament for their crime, as 
is the situation now, this leads our country into a very dangerous stage of 
its history. My natural instinct is to fight the Establishment crime I am 
subjected to rather than give way to it. If I have to die in that cause then 
so be it. The evil people I have named to you will ultimately be called to 
answer for their crimes whether I am dead or alive. I do not request a 
Public Inquiry into these matters. I think it appropriate in the 
circumstances which I have detailed to you that I am right to demand one.



Perhaps from information given to me you should look more into the Operation 
Ore list and see how many of them are members of the Freemasons. Perhaps it 
would also be useful to find out how many judges and police officers are 
included on that list and who amongst them are still employed in the Public 
Service where no action against them has been taken either. William Hamilton 
the Dunblane child mass murderer was also a known mason. There is little 
doubt that his involvement in that matter is still cause for alarm to many 
over the one hundred year clamp down on news of the matter of his massacre 
at Dunblane.





Signed by me Maurice Kellett



Of:



Address withheld for the purposes of this e-mailing only.



On this 11th day of November 2003.



C.C. All interested parties and publication to the general public.



Tony Blair and Home Secretary David Blunkett continue to ignore the matters 
of serious crime contained in letters to them. By ancient law, they are held 
to be guilty of the crimes carried out against me as if they had personaly 
carried them out themselves. When people such as Blair ande Blunkett in such 
public positions, can and do ignore such matters which have included the 
murder attempts made on me, then we do indeed have a very serious situation 
existing in the UK. Can and should we recognise any authority that they 
claim to have given such circumstances as I give here and backed up by a 
mass of evidence supporting it.?



Latest News.



Prime Minister Tony Blair and Home Secretary David Blunkett were informned 
several times last year of the mass of establishment crime carried out 
against me after I first confronted UK Freemasonry  following an illegal 
Houghton-le-Spring  Magistrates court back in 1986 backed up and assisted by 
the Lord Chancellors Department. They were also informed of the murder 
attempt made on me by Northumbria Police Special Squad officers (Murder 
Squad in fact) in early February 2003. Earlier this year I was told by what 
I believe was good authority that Tony Blair is in fact a member of the 
Freemasons. My visits to his usual pub at Sedgefied when in the area, had 
helped me realise this anyway.  Little wonder now why he readily accepted 
that Freemasonry was not a Secret Society but a Society with Secrets when he 
became PM! They are in fact both of these things. Queen Elizabeth II is 
Patron  Head of UK Freemasonry, the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of 
Wales are also Freemasons. Nearer my former home at 16A The Lyons, 
Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, one which I will eventually take back if that be 
my last and final act, the Grand Master for the Durham Masonic Lodges is 
Lord Barnard of Raby Castle, near Barnard Castle. The Duke of Kent the 
Queens relative and a member of the Royal Family, is of course the Grand 
Master of UK Freemasonry. In fact the whole of the UK establishment is bound 
up with the Secret Society of Freemasonry from senior police officers and 
judges to many Town Councillors and Members of Parliament. The former name 
of Freemasonry was the Knights Templars of the Holy Wars against Islam 
Infamy. My ancestors, the Bruce Clan of Scotland, had fought alongside them 
at the battle of Bannockburn against the English with an astonishing 
victory. Robert the Bruce was the protector of the Knights Templars when 
they were being executed as heritics by the Pope and Catholic Church. Many 
of the Knights Templars came to Scotland then and hence the reason why so 
many Freemasons still reside in Scotland up until this present time.



The Queen's Honours List may well be one of the ways used to help maintain 
the British Monarchy. How many such people though can be really be declared 
as being honourable? The Judicial Oath of Fairness to All Manner of Men, 
sworn by all judges and magistrates to the Queen is a fraud. I wrote to her 
about three years ago asking if she bore any responsibility whatsoever to 
act on the matter of judicial crime in the UK. The reply that I received to 
my letter showed that she does not accept any responsibility when judges 
breach their Judicial Oath and further that the UK does not have any 
independent or impartial tribunals or authorities as required under Article 
6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. If the Judicial Oath had any 
meaning whatsoever I would not have subject to so much judicial and indeed 
police crime helping to back it  up. Former recorder John H Fryer-Spedding 
was forefront in putting the final criminal touches to my cases DH400950, 
DH00898 and NE401650. He agreed that it was his intension to deprive me of 
my rights after carrying out a mass of blatant crimes against me that 
perverted the course of justice. This fact is verified by his own approved 
transcript of judgement.  A summary investigation shows that it had been 
Spedding's prior intent to carry out those acts against me. Spedding claimed 
that he was not a Freemason but I have found that Freemasons are most often 
consistent liars when upholding the evils acts of Freemasonry.



In 2002 Spedding was given an award by Queen Elizabeth II and I wonder now 
whether he got it from the Queen in that position, or whether he got if from 
her as Patron Head of UK Freemasonry? By now, Spedding should have been 
serving out a long prison sentence for what he carried out against me 
instead of having been given an award by the Patron Head of UK Freemasonry 
and living his life of luxury at his Stately Home near Keswick, Cumbria, 
costing the public a fee to view. He has served as a significant part of the 
truth that our Justice System, or rather lack of it, is just as corrupt as 
there is anywhere in the world, with judges and police officers are all 
playing their part in such injustice being carried out against members of an 
unsuspecting UK general public. Police generous pensions, early retirement 
age, and the likes, all play a part in helping maintain our corrupt system 
of evil justice by buying off the silence of would be establishment whistle 
blowers who are fully aware of what is taking place right across the present 
day UK.



It was Lords Woolf and Bingham, allegedly two top authorities on UK Law, 
who maintained in my case, that my concerns about probable Masonic influence 
in my cases had no relevance. They were both wrong. Any litigant who 
believes that a court may not be impartial or independent in a case before a 
court, and such court ignores the litigants concern relative to it, that is 
an automatic breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. 
I cannot think for a moment that Woolf and Bingham were not aware of this as 
proved since by case law under what is often referred to as the Dundee 
Tribunal case. No I believe that Woolf and Bingham were most likely 
protecting Freemasonry which is the Old Boys Club of  our generally very 
corrupt system of injustice. Stitch ups, lies deceit and even murder are all 
a part of their tools.



A decision was upheld by the UK Court Service that no judges at the Durham 
County Court were required to declare any membership of Freemasonry as I had 
required of them. They too were wrong about this again because of the Dundee 
Tribunal case ruling. Durham County Court has received my claim for damages 
made against it for the crime carried out and used against me by some of its 
judges that contributed to nothing short of a massive perversion of the 
course of justice. They too continue to ignore my claim made against them. 
However, who pulls the strings for the staff of the Court Service? The age 
old saying "Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here" was never more applicable as 
in my case when I entered the Durham County Court then wrongly  believing 
that the administration of justice was their purpose as paid for from the 
public purse. I had in fact entered into a den of Masonic thieves and 
criminals backed up by an even higher den of  thieves and criminals we call 
our authorities. No man should ever accept such people as having lawful 
authority. The authority of criminals is no authority whatsoever and they 
must be treated and looked upon in this way if things are to get better not 
worse as they now are.



I feel the need here to include the money laundering now being carried on by 
our corrupt establishment. Land Registries are now known to be all a part of 
it. The Chief Registrar of the Durham District Land Registry, a man I am 
also satisfied is a Freemason and I have a tape recording of an interview 
with him that helps back this up, has ignored fraud used to make an illegal 
entry on its Register relative to my cases. He has also ignored reported 
forgery to him relative to my home and land. This is what Freemasonry is all 
about. The Chief Registrar told me that he has the power of discretion. That 
discretion has been used to protect criminals in my case and I have to 
wonder just how many more such similar cases exist?



As a further example of just how evil these people are, My brother, William, 
a Pittington Village New Labour Councillor, was until quite recently Leader 
of the Durham City Council. He denies being a mason but like many masons 
that I am aware of, he is shown to be a liar. Since February 2003 he has led 
me on to believe that he had instructed a solicitor to get back my home at 
16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. This has now been proved to have 
been a lie and he is thus implicated in serious fraud. He was recently 
served with my claim for £17.000 of my missing personal possessions in which 
he is implicated. He had previouly made sure that I did not even have a bed 
to lie on when my home was stolen. I witnessed him stealing some of what 
little was left of my personal possessions when he hid some of them in one 
of his garages at his home which he had previously claimed contained none. 
Yes, brother William, who has gone all over Europe on Council Exchange 
visits without the need for help, claims that he cannot walk unassisted when 
in fact he does this all the time. He of course claims full state benefits 
for his alleged dissability, car and all. I am aware now that facts show 
that masons are often given full State Benefits when they have no 
entitlement to them whatsoever. It sickens me further when I learned that 
brother William told my father not long before his death, that he was not a 
member of the Freemasons. In 2000 when I asked him and his wife to look 
after what was our remaining pet dog named Trish, when I was on the run from 
part of our Masonic ruling mob. On my return home some of my personal 
possessions were missing and Trish had a swollen stomach. William agreed 
that he had stolen my possesions which included documents relative to my 
cases, those sent to me from fellow establishment victims, and proof of my 
allegations made against our corrupt establishment generally. It was certain 
afterwards that at least some of those documents ended up somewhere in the 
Durham Grand Lodges of Freemasonry. William had also been giving Trish food 
which needed water to be added to it before feeding it to her. He had been 
giving it to her in dry form and when she drank water after eating it, it 
swelled up in her stomach. He and his wife had kept dogs for a long time and 
it is without a shadow of doubt that he would have known what affect his 
feeding Trish in that way would have had on her. Shortly afterwards I had to 
have Trish destroyed which greatly upset me further. I have since been led 
to understand that a mason can declare the harm that he has done to someone 
who is considered by them as being anti-Masonic, before a Masonic ceremony I 
was told was called the Point of Polaris. Maybe brother William got some 
extra Masonic browny points for the harm he then caused me. The more recent 
damage that he has caused to me might even allow him even more such points? 
Brother William has only motivated me even further, if this was possible, to 
expose Freemasonry for what it all too ofen is in reality. It is an evil 
cult carried on by mostly very evil people many who clearly need psychiatric 
treatement given the ridiculous rituals they adhere to in Masonic Halls. 
Their evil has no boundaries as I have learned to my sorrow throughout since 
1986 when I then first ran up against them following the illegal 
Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court backed up and protected by what I 
accept amounts to a Masonic Mafia Division named the Lord Chancellors 
Department..



I make this plea to the people of the UK nation. Before you cast a vote for 
any Town Councillor, Member of Parliament or any such similar or associated 
positions of authority, please try to find out if that person yopu might 
vote for is a member of the Freemasons. Criminality and Freemasonry go hand 
in hand with one another. Helping to elect a Freemason into a position of 
authority is also electing a criminal or prospective criminal into such 
position. Huge numbers of such people already in authority are in fact 
already known to be Freemasons. For those of you who may not be sure what 
Freemasonry is all about, it is to be likened to a gang of criminals no 
less. This gang of criminals now rules the UK right up to and from the 
places that I have previously mentioned.



I have made a damages claim against Tony Blair in the sum of £5.000000 for 
his failure to have set in motion the necessary procedures to have set up 
such independent tribunals or authorities as Article 6(1) of the European 
Human Rights Convention requires. Like the other facts that I have made 
known to him, he simply ignores it. Blair's failure to implement such 
independent or impartial  tribunals or authorities is a blatant denial of 
the rights of all UK citizens.



One of my web sites at: www.//mason-rule.bizhosting.com has been hacked and 
some evidence of my allegations removed from it. My password to that site 
has also been hacked and changed clearly so that I cannot replace that 
evidence removed from it. A copy letter received from Blair's pal, Fraser 
Kemp MP, who wrote to me that he was not permitted to raise issues in the 
House of Commons!!!??? was part of the evidence published on it. I hope to 
put this situation right in the near future. Several of my former websites 
have been taken down and this has taken place with the certain influence of 
our very corrupt establishment. It will be seen on the latter website that 
my e-mail address is given as maurice.kellett@ntlworld.comthOne of my other 
e-mail addresses is:  m.kellett@tiscali.co.uk





Best wishes to all.



TOGETHER WE CAN DEFEAT OUR MASONIC INFESTED EVIL ESTABLISHMENT AND HELP 
BRING ABOUT A FAIRER AND BETTER BRITAIN FOR ALL.



Maurice Kellett.