|
|
|
date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:17:58 -0000,
group: uk.local.south-wales
back
Help needed
Can anyone identify this?
http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201470914171
It's a visitor's permit allowing a car to be parked, perhaps in an office
complex, perhaps in a private block of flats or apartments.
I need to find out where it was issued.
It was found in my car and I need to find out where it came from in order to
determine where my car was on the date in question and equally where it
wasn't. It might also lead me to find who was driving it.
I suspect that it it is most likely to be Cardiff Bay.
I will reward the first person who helps me correctly identify this with a
slap up meal for you and your partner.
If anyone knows people who might recognise this ticket, such as parking
attendants, taxi drivers or security guards who work in the Cardiff area
then please could you forward this link to them.
Many thanks
JB
john_banana@yahoo.com
date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:17:58 -0000
author: JB
|
Re: Help needed
JB wrote:
> Can anyone identify this?
>
> http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201470914171
Nothing usefull on the back?
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:47:44 +0000
author: Blah
|
Re: Help needed
"Blah" wrote in message
news:605tn1F1oo4qbU1@mid.individual.net...
> JB wrote:
>> Can anyone identify this?
>>
>> http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201470914171
>
> Nothing usefull on the back?
Just plain blue.
I've asked around a few caretakers of flats in the Bay and they don't
recognise it.
They all seem to think it might be a pub or a hotel.
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:55:23 -0000
author: JB
|
Re: Help needed
JB wrote:
>
> "Blah" wrote in message
> news:605tn1F1oo4qbU1@mid.individual.net...
>> JB wrote:
>>> Can anyone identify this?
>>>
>>> http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201470914171
>>>
>>
>> Nothing usefull on the back?
>
>
> Just plain blue.
>
> I've asked around a few caretakers of flats in the Bay and they don't
> recognise it.
> They all seem to think it might be a pub or a hotel.
>
Is the watermark profesional or just printed on?
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:08:46 +0000
author: Blah
|
Re: Help needed
"Blah" wrote in message
news:606r2eF1okd4uU1@mid.individual.net...
> JB wrote:
>>
>> "Blah" wrote in message
>> news:605tn1F1oo4qbU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> JB wrote:
>>>> Can anyone identify this?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201470914171
>>>
>>> Nothing usefull on the back?
>>
>>
>> Just plain blue.
>>
>> I've asked around a few caretakers of flats in the Bay and they don't
>> recognise it.
>> They all seem to think it might be a pub or a hotel.
>>
> Is the watermark profesional or just printed on?
It's all printed onto the paper and looks like something anyone could knock
up on a pc so I doubt if it's a government agency. Cardiff City Council
don't recognise it.
It suggests to me that it is a small company carpark, a hotel, a resident's
association ....... that kind of thing.
I am guessing that it's Cardiff based on some circumstantial evidence. There
is a chance it could be from somewhere else. At worst it will be from
somewhere along the A470 corridor between Merthyr and Cardiff.
Since there are no real identifiable marks on it I basically need to spread
it far and wide until someone does recognise it.
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:19:33 -0000
author: JB
|
Re: Help needed
JB wrote:
> "Blah" wrote in message
>
> It's all printed onto the paper and looks like something anyone could
> knock up on a pc so I doubt if it's a government agency. Cardiff City
> Council don't recognise it.
> It suggests to me that it is a small company carpark, a hotel, a
> resident's association ....... that kind of thing.
>
> I am guessing that it's Cardiff based on some circumstantial evidence.
> There is a chance it could be from somewhere else. At worst it will be
> from somewhere along the A470 corridor between Merthyr and Cardiff.
>
> Since there are no real identifiable marks on it I basically need to
> spread it far and wide until someone does recognise it.
I thought 'homemade' too, carpark split into two, no apostrophe in
"visitor's", no logo and is that
visitors_car_park_permit DOT pub at the bottom right - if so someone has
knocked it up on MS Publisher and thats the file name.
If not, its a permit for a pub!
In either case you may be stuck as they may have only knocked up a weeks
worth for a busy period, done the rest in a different colour or changed
the style completely.
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:41:07 +0000
author: Blah
|
Re: Help needed
Blah wrote...
> JB wrote:
> > Can anyone identify this?
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201470914171
>
> Nothing usefull on the back?
>
Long stratches - bloody woman should cut her nails more often
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:12:23 -0000
author: M² T..
|
Re: Help needed
Blah warbled...
> I thought 'homemade' too, carpark split into two, no apostrophe in
> "visitor's", no logo and is that
> visitors_car_park_permit DOT pub at the bottom right - if so someone has
> knocked it up on MS Publisher and thats the file name.
> If not, its a permit for a pub!
>
> In either case you may be stuck as they may have only knocked up a weeks
> worth for a busy period, done the rest in a different colour or changed
> the style completely.
>
I don't think it is home-made. If it were, then it's likely that the
date would be pre-entered.
'Car Park' uis two words, not one, so that is correct on the permit.
Sadly, as far as the apostrophe is concerned, it is often omitted even
from such 'official' forms as this, and even if the form is
professionally printed... especially where there may be some confusion,
in this case between
"Vistors' Car Park" (more than one visitor) or
"Visitor's Car Park" (Singular)
As for the Visitors Car Park Permit Pub... I would suggest that the
'Pub' is more likely to stand for 'Public'.
--
Bev.
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:46:51 -0000
author: Bev
|
Re: Help needed
Bev wrote:
> Blah warbled...
>> I thought 'homemade' too, carpark split into two, no apostrophe in
>> "visitor's", no logo and is that
>> visitors_car_park_permit DOT pub at the bottom right - if so someone has
>> knocked it up on MS Publisher and thats the file name.
>> If not, its a permit for a pub!
>>
>> In either case you may be stuck as they may have only knocked up a weeks
>> worth for a busy period, done the rest in a different colour or changed
>> the style completely.
>>
> I don't think it is home-made. If it were, then it's likely that the
> date would be pre-entered.
Not if its somewhere like a beach, or forest drive where they might get
a million visitors one day and none for a week, easier to scribble in as
you go along.
I know people who print tickets and the watermark is usually embossed in
foil, and any professionally printed one would have the logo of the user
AND somewhere - the name and phone of the printers
> 'Car Park' uis two words, not one, so that is correct on the permit.
> Sadly, as far as the apostrophe is concerned, it is often omitted even
> from such 'official' forms as this, and even if the form is
> professionally printed... especially where there may be some confusion,
> in this case between
> "Vistors' Car Park" (more than one visitor) or
> "Visitor's Car Park" (Singular)
>
> As for the Visitors Car Park Permit Pub... I would suggest that the
> 'Pub' is more likely to stand for 'Public'.
Dunno, if they can waste lots of letters for most of the phrase why
abbreviated just Pub, they have lots of empty space and plenty of ink.
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:01:21 +0000
author: Blah
|
Re: Help needed
In message , Blah
writes
>JB wrote:
>> "Blah" wrote in message
>>news:605tn1F1oo4qbU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> JB wrote:
>>>> Can anyone identify this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.geocities.com/john_banana/CanSomeoneIdentifyThis.html?1201
>>>>470914171
>>>
>>> Nothing usefull on the back?
>> Just plain blue.
>> I've asked around a few caretakers of flats in the Bay and they
>>don't recognise it.
>> They all seem to think it might be a pub or a hotel.
>>
>Is the watermark profesional or just printed on?
That "watermark" reminds me of the small printing on my road fund
licence.
It's not the DVLC, perchance?
--
Jane Sullivan
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:25:01 +0000
author: Jane Sullivan
|
Re: Help needed
Blah warbled...
> Bev wrote:
> > Blah warbled...
> >> I thought 'homemade' too, carpark split into two, no apostrophe in
> >> "visitor's", no logo and is that
> >> visitors_car_park_permit DOT pub at the bottom right - if so someone has
> >> knocked it up on MS Publisher and thats the file name.
> >> If not, its a permit for a pub!
> >>
> >> In either case you may be stuck as they may have only knocked up a weeks
> >> worth for a busy period, done the rest in a different colour or changed
> >> the style completely.
> >>
> > I don't think it is home-made. If it were, then it's likely that the
> > date would be pre-entered.
>
> Not if its somewhere like a beach, or forest drive where they might get
> a million visitors one day and none for a week, easier to scribble in as
> you go along.
> I know people who print tickets and the watermark is usually embossed in
> foil, and any professionally printed one would have the logo of the user
> AND somewhere - the name and phone of the printers
>
You misunderstand. I don't think it's professionally printed for a
specific purpose. However I don't think it's home made. I think it's an
off the shelf 'one size fits many' type of ticket.
<snip>
> > As for the Visitors Car Park Permit Pub... I would suggest that the
> > 'Pub' is more likely to stand for 'Public'.
>
> Dunno, if they can waste lots of letters for most of the phrase why
> abbreviated just Pub, they have lots of empty space and plenty of ink.
>
In that case perhaps it is a pub attached to something else... ie there
are several car parks within one 'attraction' (for want of a better
word) and this is the car park attached to the pub.
My money's on pub as opposed to pri.
Don't suppose we'll ever know though.
--
Bev.
date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:38:56 -0000
author: Bev
|
Re: Help needed
Bev wrote...
>
> My money's on pub as opposed to pri.
> Don't suppose we'll ever know though.
>
>
Nah - on the wrong track completely.
date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:03:36 -0000
author: M² T..
|
Re: Help needed
Jane Sullivan wrote...
>
> That "watermark" reminds me of the small printing on my road fund
> licence.
>
> It's not the DVLC, perchance?
>
>
Close, but no banana. It's another kind of big brother
http://tinyurl.com/2lfgzb
date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:08:15 -0000
author: M² T..
|
Re: Help needed
M² T.. wrote:
> Jane Sullivan wrote...
>
>
>> That "watermark" reminds me of the small printing on my road fund
>> licence.
>>
>> It's not the DVLC, perchance?
>>
>>
>
>
> Close, but no banana. It's another kind of big brother
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2lfgzb
>
hah, only a year out, it was 2005.....
Perhaps they started queing early.
date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:52:47 +0000
author: Blah
|
Re: Help needed
Blah wrote...
> M² T.. wrote:
> > Jane Sullivan wrote...
> >
> >
> >> That "watermark" reminds me of the small printing on my road fund
> >> licence.
> >>
> >> It's not the DVLC, perchance?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Close, but no banana. It's another kind of big brother
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/2lfgzb
> >
> hah, only a year out, it was 2005.....
> Perhaps they started queing early.
>
They were both 17th May 2006
knob
date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:59:10 -0000
author: M² T..
|
Re: Help needed
M² T.. wrote:
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2lfgzb
>>>
>> hah, only a year out, it was 2005.....
>> Perhaps they started queing early.
>>
>
>
> They were both 17th May 2006
>
>
> knob
>
When I looked at the date on the ticket I thought - 2 years ago.
I forgot we were now in 2008 when I replied to you.
yes, knob!
date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:18:34 +0000
author: Blah
|
Re: Help needed
It looks like the University car park to me, just around from the museum.
"Blah" wrote in message
news:609jhaF1op6g5U1@mid.individual.net...
> M² T.. wrote:
>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2lfgzb
>>>>
>>> hah, only a year out, it was 2005.....
>>> Perhaps they started queing early.
>>>
>>
>>
>> They were both 17th May 2006
>>
>>
>> knob
>>
> When I looked at the date on the ticket I thought - 2 years ago.
> I forgot we were now in 2008 when I replied to you.
>
> yes, knob!
date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:13:21 -0000
author: Jeremy Pinwhistle
|
|
|