Democracy and People

In the report on U.S. military policy by Project for New American
Century it is stated: "It is now commonly understood that information and
other new technologies are creating a dynamic that may threaten America's
ability to exercise its dominant military power. Potential rivals, such as
China are anxious to exploit those transformational technologies broadly,
while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop
ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons the effects of information and
other advanced technologies promise to revolutionize the nature of
conventional armed forces" (ref. 13, pg. 4 and 11). The military concept of
information technologies is, though, kept hidden from the world general
public.

In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya, in the article "Riders of
Psychotronic Apocalypse" (1), informed that in 1996 Russian government's
information agency FAPSI warned that the effect of "informational means of
war" is comparable to "the effect of use of weapon of mass destruction" and
produced a report entitled "Information Weapon as a Threat to National
Security of Russia". In reaction the Russian State Duma and consequently
Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed the
United Nations, OBSE and European Council with a proposal for an
international convention banning the development and use of informational
weapons. According to the same newspaper Segodnya in March 1998, the matter
was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the
agenda of General Assembly of the U.N. Most probably the USA vetoed this
proposal and in consequence the ban of informational weapons was not
discussed by the General Assembly of the United Nations.

In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation,
signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening
the informational security of Russian Federation, is listed the threat to
the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere
of spiritual life individual, group and societal consciousness and
illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal
consciousness. (16). Among the major directions of the international
cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the information security is listed
the ban of production, dissemination and use of information weapons.(17).

Segodnya, in the discussed article, described mostly "mysterious
information-psychological" means capable not only of harming human health,
but also of blocking human free will at the subconscious level, impairing
human beings ability of political, cultural and other self-identification"
and even causing destruction of indivisible informational and spiritual
space of the Russian Federation. According to Russian scientist A. F.
Okhatrin, those means are also capable to kill people (2). Underneath the
article, Segodnya published a review of weapons affecting human psyche which
it obtained from the Russian Department of Defense. Together with
ultrasound and microwave weapons, there are listed "psychotronic weapons"
which, in addition to having the capability of "transfering information
among people", are able to act on communication and electronic systems (1).

In the Space Preservation Bill proposed by Congressman Dennis J.
Kucinich in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001, the following
technologies enabling access to human brain, human health impairment or
killing of people were named: "land-based, sea-based or space-based systems
using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other
energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the
purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons
or populations" (4). "Psychotronic weapon" listed in the Dennis J.
Kucinich's bill is described as a weapon using "torsion fields" radiation in
the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" (6) by Russian
scientist Vladimir Tsygankov and Vladimir Lopatin (a politician, who worked
on Committees on Security in Russian Federal Republic, State Duma of the
Russian Federation and the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of
Independent States). Among the possible sources of remote influence on
human psyche those two authors list generators of physical fields of
"known as well as unknown nature" (14). It is well known that both KGB and
CIA carried out a large-scale research of psychic phenomena in the 70s of
the past century. It is not out of question that their scientists succeded
in discovering the physical basis of those phenomena. The physical concept
of non-local electron and photon connection can be certainly used to explain
those phenomena.

The ability of sound and light technologies to influence human psyche
is exemplified by Psychowalkman industry. The existence of the
electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed in the Conclusion of
the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma [3] and can be deduced
from scientific and military literature.

Nerve impulses in the brain are carried by electrical signals triggered
by changes in chemical balance. During the fifties and sixties of the past
century, it was proved that human nervous system and behavior can be
thoroughly controlled by electric signals imported to the brain by tiny
electrodes (41). 100 stimulations of one point in the bulls brain made him
100 times bellow. When a man was asked to straighten his hand the bending of
which was stimulated he replied I think your electricity is stronger then
my will. By means of electrical stimulation of the brain the rhythm of
breathing and heart beat [this was even stopped for several pulses] was
affected as well as the function of the most of the viscera - alike the
secretion of the gall bladder. The stimulation of points in the brain where
feelings and emotions reside produced decisions. A passive, depressed woman
tore up a piece of paper when her center of anger was stimulated: I did not
control myself. I had to get up and tear, she commented. An aggressive
woman, with the same point stimulated, got up and smashed against the wall
the guitar she was playing until the moment of stimulation. The intensity of
feelings could be controlled by turning the knob which controlled the
intensity of the electric current. When the pleasure center was stimulated
women offered marriage to therapists. Stimulation of a point in a monkeys
brain stopped her maternal behavior toward a newborn baby. When the limbic
system was stimulated the patients vigilance weakened, they lost capacity to
think, often they began to undress or grope and when the stimulation stopped
they did not remember it. The signals had to be delivered in specific
frequencies to produce repetitive action of neurons. Spanish scientist Jose
Delgado became world known when he, with the use of this technology, made a
bull attack him by pressing one button on the small black box and stopped
the bull few feet away from him by pressing another button.

The idea that electric currents in the brain could be induced by
electromagnetic energy is an obvious next step in this path of research. The
information inside of the brain is processed digitally; in other words
analog perceptions are translated and transferred by a number and
frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the feeling or
perception usually corresponds to the intensity of electrical current.
Walter J. Freeman, who had been for years measuring the brain activity in
reaction to different stimuli by multitudes of microelectrodes, presented
already in 1975 a hypothesis that a novel external stimulus is broadly
transmitted from the primary sensory cortex or thalamus to other parts of
the cortex... transmission occurs at some characteristic frequency,
and...reception occurs in ... sets tuned to that frequency (37). In other
words, when neurons cooperate in the processing of specific information they
synchronize their activity and oscillate in the same frequency. In an
experiment by Wolf Singer (20) the differences in brain activity in reaction
to two different stimuli, presented to the tested subject at the same time,
were represented by two different groups of neurons oscillating in different
frequencies. In the modern scientific literature synchronization of
frequencies of emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain as a
principle of brain functioning is generally accepted (19).
Electroencephalographers have no doubt that those synchronizations appear on
the EEG recordings and are already able to read in those frequencies the
single letters of a word perceived by the tested subject (21).
Theoretically this means that the events in the brain can be produced
synthetically from the outside when additional energy is pumped into the
brain in specific frequencies corresponding to specific brain activities.
John Marks, in his book on CIA mind control research, quotes one of the CIA
research veterans recalling a colleagues joke: If you could find the
natural radio frequency of a persons sphincter, you could make him run out
of the room real fast (22). Since most of the activity of human brain takes
place in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz and electromagnetic waves of this
frequency are hundreds and even thousands of miles long, and, for that
matter, could not target human brain, scientists started experimenting with
pulsed microwaves. There exist window frequencies at which microwaves
penetrate deep enough into the brain to produce activity of neurons.

The interaction of electromagnetic radiation and chemicals in the brain
was demonstrated for example by the experiment where irradiation of rats
heads by 20 and 40 mW/cm2 microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz woke the
rats up in 5 minutes from narcosis (23). Electrical signals of neurons in
the brain are mediated by chemicals called neurotransmitters. At a
conference on Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine in 1989 Capt. Paul Tyler,
director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project between 1970 and
1977, quoted in his lecture the research of Dr. Merrit who measured the
decrease of norepinephrine, serotonine and dopamine when a field of 80
mW/cm2 was applied (24). All those hormones act as neurotransmitters into
the cortex. Dopamin influences the ability to learn and other cognitive
abilities. Disruption in the biosynthesis or transmission of dopamine can
lead to Parkinsons disease. In another experiment a 500Hz signal produced
release of neradrenaline in sympathetical neurons (25). Since those
neurons control the muscles of internal organs and noraderenaline acts there
as a neurotransmitter, an oposite signal should be able to reduce the
activity of internal organs and eventually impair human health. The
publication of the World Health Organization on the effects of
electromagnetic radiation on living organisms from 1981 (25) gives many
examples of the effects of microwave radiation on the excretion of glands
and chemical composition of blood. Many of those effects could harm human
health. Microwave radiation can also affect molecules of DNA and thus
affect the development of organisms (25). This was proved by an experiment
by Yale neurophysiologist, Jose Delgado, where the irradiation of chicken
embryos by 10, 100 and 1000 Hz stopped their development including the
development of hearts and veins. The experiment was replicated by the
American Navy with the same results. Such attack by microwaves could have,
in the long run, disastrous impact on targeted populations.

A a matter of fact microwave radiation can produce many deadly effects.
In the experiment by McAffee already mentioned, the microwaves pulsed at
300, 600 and 1000 Hz produced impairment in breathing (leading even to
suffocation) in rats. A similar signal could also suffocate human beings.
At the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1983
the experiment was presented where blood clots were formed by microwave
radiation (26). This capability is also suitable for weaponisation.
Similarly dangerous is the finding of Allan Frey that radio frequency
radiation can weaken the blood-brain barrier that prevents poisonous
chemicals from the access into the brain (30). In 1986 the American Air
Force issued a book Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology (18).
The chapter headed Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict, was
written by Capt. Paul Tyler, who had been the director of the U.S. Navy
Electromagnetic Radiation Project from 1970 until 1977. At the beginning of
the chapter, Tyler quotes a source entitled Final Report on Biotechnology
Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000 that
had been issued by American Air Force in 1982: Currently available data
allow the projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR)
fields may pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats
... the passage of approximately 100 miliamperes through the myocardium can
lead to cardiac standstill and death ... A rapidly scanning RFR system could
provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System
effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse width,
repetition frequency, and carrier frequency.

In less draconian assault, the use of microwaves could be limited just
to the influence of human behavior. In 1985 Kathleen McAuliffe visited Jose
Delgado in his laboratory in Spain, where he experimented with
electromagnetic stimulation of brain. She subsequently wrote an article for
the magazine OMNI (27). Jose Delgado showed her how he could make an ape
fall asleep, or make it overactive, or how he could calm down fighting fish
using suitably modulated microwave radiation.

The next series of experiments shows that human behavior can be
controlled in even more intricate ways. In 1962 Allan H. Frey published in
the Journal of Applied Physiology (28) the results of experimentation with
transmission of sounds into the brain by electromagnetic radiation at a
distance of up to 1000 feet. The electromagnetic sounds were heard by
deaf as well as hearing people. In his report, Frey writes that, by then,
only the visual system had been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy
and he noted that, With somewhat different transmission parameters we can
induce the perception of severe buffeting of the head.. and Changing ...
parameters again, one can induce a pins-and-needles sensation. Freys
experiment was replicated several times by other scientists (28). Another,
more advanced experiment that also involved the transmission of radio
modulated with audible sounds into the brain, was published only
inadvertently, when Don R. Justesen used, in the article on "Microwaves and
Behavior" (29), the result of an experiment described to him over the
telephone conversation by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who worked on a secret
military project Pandora. Joseph C. Sharp at the Walter Reed Army Institute
improved the method of Frey to the point that he was able to transmit into
the experimental subjects brain words which he could understand. The
ability of U.S. military to produce perception of speech in humans by
microwave radiation substantiates the article by Sharon Weinberger, Mind
Games, which was published in The Washington Post in January 2007. In
response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for the article the
Air Force released records that note that the patent was based on human
experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were
able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects The article also
states that the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to
discuss it or release other materials (31).

Robert Becker, who was twice nominated for Nobel price for his share in
the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of broken
bones, wrote about the experiment by J. F. Schapitz, who stated: In this
investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be
conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconcscious
parts of the human brain - i. e. without employing any technical devices for
receiving or transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such
influence having a chance to control the information input consciously. In
one of the four experiments subjects were given a test of hundred questions,
ranging from easy to technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being
irradiated, they would be subjected to information beams suggesting the
answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for some of their
correct answers, and memory falsification for other correct answers. After
2 weeks they had to pass the test again (30). The results of those
experiments were never published. Apparently in those experiments the
messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound frequencies which the
human brain perceives, but of which the subject is unaware. According to
Russian newspapers, in this way, people may be programmed to perform
different actions in the same way people can be programmed under hypnosis.
The use of this method was questioned in the Russian press when general Lev
Rokhlin was killed by his wife in his sleep at 2 a.m. after she had had a
casual telephone conversation with a female friend. Did her friend use a
sequence of words which were supposed to trigger the murderous action?
Before his murder General Rokhlin planned for army protests against army
reform and visited editors desks of Russian newspapers, telling them he
might be soon killed in a car accident, during a drinking spree or during an
argument with his wife (42).

In his book Cross Currents Robert Becker presents the report coming
from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute,
where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the transmission of words
into the brain by radiofrequency radiation. The report deals with the
effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous system and describes the
division of testing program into four parts: 1) prompt debilitating effects;
2) prompt stimulation auditory effects; 3) work interference (stoppage)
effects; 4) effects on stimulus controlled behavior. The report presents
this conclusion: Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous
system and produce stimulation similar to electrical stimulation unrelated
to heat (32).

The American Air Force, according to the Final Report on Biotechnology
Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000,
divided the research of radiofrequency weapons into three areas: 1) Pulsed
RFR Effects - projected research since 1980 until 1995; 2) Mechanisms of
RFR with Living Systems referred to as continuation of ongoing research
beginning in 1980 and forecast to conclude around 1997;
3) RFR forced disruptive phenomena - starting around 1986 with the
projected
continuation until 2010. In the second volume of this report, it was stated
that the work on the project was progressing according to the schedule or in
advance. The last-mentioned area of research is redefined in the second
volume: While initial attention should be toward degradation of human
performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects,
subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and
interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields... (33).

In the Soviet Russia the ongoing research in this area was completely
hidden from the public, but change of political system and actual use of
this equipment during the putsch against Gorbachov brought this subject to
newspapers headlines. According to Russian daily newspapers, during the
failed coup d'etat against Gorbachov, General Kobets warned the defenders of
the Russian White House that mind control technology could be used against
them. After the putsch, respected Russian scientist Victor Sedlecki
published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda that
psychotronic biogenerators were mass produced in the Soviet Union and were
used during the failed coup d'etat [7], but failed to succeed due to the
inexperience of the personel who operated them. In the following spree of
articles on the subject of mind control, the experiment was published where
manipulation of masses of people by microwave radiation was performed.
Already in 1974, after successful testing on a military unit in Novosibirsk,
the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government
Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR,
described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves.
Apparently, in 1974, the entire military unit was put to sleep (5).

In the book Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology (18),
Captain Tyler also wrote: Because of the many parameters involved and the
apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific response.
The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an enormous range of
options to the user. It opens the door for providing an appropriate
response in warfare, be it conventional or unconventional (18). If you
object that the range of frequencies in which the human nervous system works
is too narrow to provide for such a wide choice of reactions, Capt. Tyler
writes: There are unconfirmed reports that change of 0.01 Hz can make a
difference. Since many activities of human brain are represented by
different sequences of frequencies, this provides for further large choices.

At the end of 1994 the first tests of the most powerful radar system in
the world were carried out in Alaska. This year its power should reach 10
billion watts and later 100 billion watts. The main features of the system
include its ability to heat the ionosphere and in this way change the
altitude of the ionosphere. By this kind of manipulation of the ionosphere,
it is possible to bounce the electromagnetic waves back from the ionosphere
to whichever region of the planet one wishes to target. According to the
official information by the U.S. government the system HAARP is designed for
scientific research. However, there are too many facts suggesting that the
major reason for its construction are military purposes. The main patent
of Bernard J. Eastlund (number 4,686,605) proposes the use of the system for
destruction of navigation systems of airplanes and missiles wherever in the
atmosphere they might be, and for interference with all communication
systems anywhere on the planet, and the global weather control. Other
patents connected with the system propose the use of the system for
induction of detonations in the extent of nuclear explosions and other
military uses (33).

Evidently, the warning of Russian intelligence agency FAPSI to the
Russian government and the article in the Russian daily Segodnya were
amongst the recations to the installation of the U.S. system HAARP. The
HAARP system can pulse microwave radiation begining from one thousandth of
one Hertz and, in this case, there is hardly and doubt that it can change
pulses of microwave radiation by 1 thousandth of Hertz, as well in
frequencies from 1 to 100 Hertz which are crucial for the functioning of
human nervous system. In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who apparently
worked on the American Navy's project of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons
Sleeping Beauty, published, in a scientific magazine Perception and Motor
Skills the article where he states: the technical capability to influence
directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the
human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by
generating neural information within a physical medium within which all
members of the species are immersed is now marginally feasible (34).

John B. Alexander, who later became the Director of Non-lethal Programs
in Los Alamos National Laboratory, wrote in his article in the Military
Review in the year 1980: whoever makes the first major breakthrough in this
field will have a quantum lead over his opponent, an advantage similar to
sole possession of nuclear weapons (35). Samuel Koslov, a leading
personality of the Pandora project that was dedicated to research of effects
of microwave radiation on humans, and a researcher at the John Hopkins
University, in his closing speech at the conference on Nonlinear
Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1984, said that the conference had
proven that the external electric fields can become a key to the cellular
control console. The implications, social, economic, and even military are
enormous. Koslov went on: If much of what we have heard is indeed
correct, it may be not less significant to the nation than the prospects
that faced the physics community in 1939 when the long-time predicted
fissionability of the nucleus was actually demonstrated. You may recall the
famous letter of Albert Einstein to President Roosvelt. When were in a
position to do so in terms of our proofs, I would propose that an analogous
letter is required (26).

It is this perspective, of the revolutionary nature of these scientific
developments, that gives us the title, Revolution in Military Affairs and
Conflict Short of War, of a book published by the Strategic Studies
Institute at the U.S. Army War College in 1994 (36). Since the national
security information is in question, the book cannot tell the readers what
technology exactly is making this revolution feasible. From the beginning
the authors were aware that the use of this technology may run counter to
basic moral and political values of the American society, and in consequence
the revolution in military affairs would require a moral and political
revolution to come first: In the pre-RMA days, psychological operations and
psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic
and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions
on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both
international and domestic... Through persistent efforts and very
sophisticated domestic consciousness raising, old-fashioned notions of
personal privacy and national sovereignty changed. Since it is difficult
for them to imagine that the American society would accept the ethical and
political revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they
develop a scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders
to back this revolution. The scenario is placed into the year 2000, and is
based on the situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and
criminality. In the document Rebuilding Americas Defenses, backed by the
past U.S. government, we read: To preserve American military preeminence in
the coming decades, the Department of Defense must seek to exploit the
emerging revolution in military affairs Further, the process of
transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a
long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl
Harbor (ref. 13, pg. 51). Was it by accident that in 2001 a masive
terrorist attack ocurred in the USA facilitated by questionable work of U.S.
intelligence services and followed by anthrax attacks where the only
indicted scientist, Bruce Ivins, did not have the technical means and
scientific knowledge to turn the anthrax spores into a deadly aerosol which
was used and that those two attacks were followed by an assault on privacy
of U.S. Citizens and international law?

The scenario goes on: The president was thus amenable to the use of
the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in
military affairs) in conflict short of war ... As technology changed the way
force was applied, things such as personal courage, face-to-face leadership,
and the warfighter mentality became irrelevant. So the psychotechnology,
which formed the core of the RMA, provided new methods for influencing the
psyche of the adversary, in place of the classical strategy to make him fear
his death. The book goes on: Potential or possible supporters of the
insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive
Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as potential or
active, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor
and focus psychological campaigns for each. There is also potential for
defensive psychotechnology such as strategic personality simulations to
aid national security decision makers. (See Norman D. Livergood and
Stephen D. Williams, Strategic Personality Simulation: A New Strategic
Concept, unpublished draft paper, Carlisle Barracks, PAK: U.S. Army War
College, 1994). In other words if there was, for example, a new Jesus
Christ, U.S. agencies would simply engineer his personality to make sure he
would not introduce any cultural changes. Once the strategy of computerized
personality simulation is applied, the unfolding of human history will be
totally controlled by elites having exclusive access to those technologies.
The conclusion of the authors was: Whether we opt for revolution or
evolution, change will occur.

The concept of the strategic personality stimulation is probably
tested on some of the people in the USA who claim to be mind control
experiments victims, whose number, rapidly growing after 9/11 attacks,
inspired the article in Washington Post, entitled Mind Games (31) in
2007. Cheryl Welsh, the director of the American organization Mind Justice
(38) claims that she has received over 2500 complaints from U.S. citizens,
that they fell victims to those experiments. Though some of those people may
be mentally ill, many of them defend themselves in a rational way that
suggests that they are mentally sound. A similar situation obtains in
Russia. Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin admitted nonconcensual
human-subject experiments had been conducted in Russia, when he wrote in
the quoted book: Compensation of damages and losses connected with social
rehabilitation of persons suffering from destructive informational influence
must be realized in legal trial (14). Growing numbers of complaints are
coming as well from China and Japan (over 200).

The European Parliament reacted to the installation of HAARP system
by calling for an international convention introducing a global ban on all
developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of
manipulation of human beings (15, Paragraph 27). The body of the European
Parliament STOA (Scientific and Technolgical Options Assessment) in the
document Crowd Control Technologies (40) informed this resolution,
originally proposed drafting of Paragraph 27 to say that the parliament
called for an international convention for a global ban on all research and
development which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical,
sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development
of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a
ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems. US Congressman
Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of a Bill introduced into the US Congress in
October 2001 proposing a ban on the deployment of mind control weapons,
was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and those people who
control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don't stop the
weaponisation of space (10).

Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of the functioning
of human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in the
USA (8) and all technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to
the same law in the Russian Federation (9). Under such conditions, the mass
media cannot fully disclose the existence and capacities of those
technologies and world public cannot be engaged in favour of a ban on the
use of such capabilities. The ownership of those capabilities gives
opportunity to governments to use them against individuals (and eventually
against masses), without giving them any access to any legal remedy. The
concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is fundamentally
corrupted in this way. In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the
Russian State Duma stated that capabilities enabling remote control of human
nervous system or the remote infliction of health impairment are available
to many modern governments (3). This was confirmed by the article from the
U.S. army weekly Defense News stating that mind control technologies were
used by the Israelis against the Palestinians (12).

Evidently the secret arms race among the world governments may continue
until the information war actually breaks out. V. Lopatin, in the book
Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia, stated that psychotronic
war is, as a matter of fact, already taking place without declaration of
war. In this way the human world may sink into some kind of virtual
reality where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision
making will be destroyed as a part of an information war or, in the worst
case, into the reality where large masses of people will be killed, and
unlike the aftermath of the deployment of nuclear weapons, the planet will
still remain inhabitable for the survivors.

With emerging energetic and climate crises and a presently-growing
global economic crisis, either the next world war could erupt, or the means
of remote manipulation of human brains and organisms could be applied to
control dissatisfied citizens. Our elected democratic representatives are
responsible for foreseeing the emerging crises and preventing them from
happening by appropriate measures. However, they do not have mandate from
citizens to allow those crises to happen, in order to create opportunities
for them to experiment with attempts to solve the problems by use of
technologies that allow them to manipulate their citizens minds. If this
technology is once used against citizens it is questionable whether true
democracy will ever be restored. The countries with the most advanced
military technologies include the USA, which has never proposed any
international initiative aimed at securing the ban of technologies enabling
the remote control of human beings. According to the study Crowd Control
Technologies published by the European Parliaments STOA office, the USA
are the major promoter of the use of those arms. (In fact, it was
principally the efforts of the USA government to persuade this outcome that
ensured the inclusion in NATO military doctrine of non-lethal technology.)
The STOA states: In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal
weapons and their place in allied arsenals; and In 1996 non-lethal tools
identified by the U.S. Army included directed energy systems and radio
frequency weapons (40).

According to the Russian government intelligence agency FAPSI, in the
last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the
means of informational war grew four times and at the present time they
occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3). Though there
are concepts of informational warfare other than the remote control of human
beings, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at
the ban of the manipulation of human brains suggests an intention to use
those means in internal as well as in international affairs. If the USA
achieve essential military preeminence in this area and if no global ban of
the use of those technologies against civilians is negotiated, the USA may
become a world totalitarian superpower of the new type.

So far the only government who made a small step toward the ban of
those technologies is the Russian Federation where the addendum to the
article 6 of the Russian Federation law On Weapons was approved on July
26, 2001. It states: within the territory of the Russian Federation is
prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects the effects of the
operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal,
infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations. Besides omitting the
psychotronic energy The law does not provide any means for Russian
citizens to defend themselves against the use of those weapons. Nor is
there any compulsion upon the police or public health organizations to set
up teams capable of detecting radiation that was enabling remote
manipulation of human body and nervous system, or the source of such
radiation. Nor does this law prohibit Russian government agencies from the
use of such technology against their own citizens. In the USA alone, some
of the federal states have enacted in their laws on firearms, new standards
on electric and electromagnetic weapons (Michigan in 2003, Massachusetts in
2004, Maine in 2005). Sanctions go from 15 years in jail to life
imprisonment, identically with weapons of mass destruction. As in Russia,
those laws do not provide for the defense of citizens against the use of
those weapons by government agencies.

On February 25, 2009 Deputy Chief of General Staff of Russian Army,
Anatoli Nogovicyn, stated that within 2 or 3 years a full fledged war in
informational sphere, including information-psychlogical influence on
population and military units may break out (39). So far politicians
(especially in the USA) have not shown responsible intention to take action
to stop this new arms race, which threatens to place human beings in a
position subsidiary to machines and to destroy democracy. Humanitarian
organizations apparently do not dare to challenge this National Security
Information (on several occasions Amnesty International and Human Rights
Watch have refused to engage with this issue). Under such circumstances, it
is left to citizens themselves to organize defense of their freedoms and
elementary human rights, before those technologies are used, either at war
or to suppress their dissatisfaction with governments who failed to prevent
the emerging crises. They should coordinate their efforts internationally
if they want to succeed.

1) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original - Riders of Psychotronic,
concise English translation of "Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse" at -
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

2) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original: Zombeing Bluff or
concise English translation of the article "The Project Zombie is a Bluff
or?" - http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

3) see Russian original Dokument - http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz, translation
State
uma -http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

4) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?c107:chemtrails

5) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original Installation Radiosleep,
concise English translation
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm -
"Installation Radiosleep"

6) http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 27-37 concise overview of the
book other excerpts you will find at the address
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

7) Russian original - http://web.io.cz.mhzzrz : Authors of Project Zombie,
concise English translation -
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm - "Authors
of Project Zombie Discovered in Kiev".

8) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - see memorandum of the Department of the Air
Force, Assembly State of New York and Communicating via the Microwave
Auditory Effect or article Mind Games in Washington Post from January
2006, where an experiment with microwave transmission of spoken phrases into
the human brain was published as well as the fact that this technology is
subject to the National Security Information law

9) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original: Secret Weapon in Action -
concise translation "Secret Superweapon in Action":
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

10) see the article from Berkeley Daily Planet"
http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550

11) http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

12) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Israel Fields Means to Suppress Palestinian
Violence

13) http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf , pg. 4

14) http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 36, or concise English
translation of the book Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia at
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

15) Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?PRG=DOCPV&APP=PV2&DATE=280199&DATEF=990128&TPV=DEF&TYPEF=A4&POS=1&SDOCTA=8&TXTLST=1&Type_Doc=RESOL&PrgPrev=TYPEF@A4%7CPRG@QUERY%7CAPP@PV2%7CFILE@BIBLIO99%7CNUMERO@5%7CYEAR@99%7CPLAGE@1&LANGUE=EN

16) Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation there
see pg. 3 - Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian
Federation) http://www.medialaw.ru/e_pages/laws/project/d2-4.htm

17) See ref. 16, pg. 19, The International Cooperation of the Russian
Federation in the Field of Ensuring Information Security"

18) Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, ed. Lt.Col. J. Dean, USAF,
Air University Press, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education,
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, june 1986 (on Internet the site exists, but
can not be found)

19) Francis H. Crick: The Astonishing Hypothesis. The Scientific Search for
the
Soul, Simon and Schuster, London, 1994, U.K.

20) Wolf Singer: The Formation of Representations in the Cerebral Cortex,
1992, Editor: Arzneimittelinformation/Medizinische redaktion, Schering,
Germany, ISSN 0940-9300

21) Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,
supplement no. 45, 1996, Continuous Wave-Form Analysis, page 64

22) John Marks: The CIA and Mind Control - the Search for Manchurian
Candidate, USA, 1988, ISBN 0-440-20137-3

23) James C. Lin: Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, Charles C.
Thomas publisher, Springfield, Illinois, USA, ISBN 0-398-03704-3,
(experiments by McAffee conducted in 1961, 1962 and 1970)

24) Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine, 1990, conference proceedings

25) Critere d'hygiene de l'environment, frequence radioelectric et
hyperfrequences, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland, 1981

26) Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems, ed. Ross Adey,
proceedings of the conference, Plenum Press, New York, London, 1984

27) magazine OMNI, February 1985, Kathleen McAuliffe "The Mind Fields"

28) Allan H. Frey, 1962, Human Auditory System Response to Modulated
Electromagnetic Energy, Journal of Aplied Physiology, 17/4, pg. 689 692 -
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/4/689
E..M. Taylor. B-. Ashelman, 1974, Analysis of Central Nervous System
Involvment in Microwave Auditory Effects, Brain research, vol. 74, pg.
201 -206
J.L. Flanagan, 1961, Audibility of Periodic Pulses and a Model for the
Threshold, Journal of Acoustic Society of America, vol. 33 (11), pg. 1540
49 K.R. Foster, E.D. Finch, 1974, Microwave Hearing: evidence for
Thermoacoustic Auditory Stimulation by Pulsed Microwaves, Science, vol. 185,
pg. 256 -258

29) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist,
March 1975, pg. 391

30) Dr. Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of
Life, William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985

31)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399_pf.html

32) Robert Becker: Cross Currents, The Startling Effects of Electromagnetic
Radiation on Your Health, 1991, Bloomsberry Publishing, London, Great
Brittain, ISBN 0-7475-0761-9

33) Dr. Nick Begich, Jeanne Maning: Angels Don't Play this HAARP, Earthpulse
Press, P.O. Box 393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA (on Internet you will find
the reference to the Final Report but the site can not be found)

34) M.A. Persinger: On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human
brain
by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms, Perception and Motor
Skills, june 1995, vol. 80, pg. 791 -799 -
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/mindnet/mn165.htm

35) John B. Alexander: The New Mental Battelfield: Beam me up Spock,
Military
Review, Dec. 1980
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon16.htm

36) Steven Metz, James Kievit, "The Revolution in Military Affairs and
Conflict
Short of War, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle
Barracks, PA 17013-5050
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=241

37) Mlada Fronta Dnes, March 28, 1997 (the Czech newspaper)

38) http://www.mindjustice.com

39) http://www.lenta.ru/news/2009/02/25/strategy/

40) Working document for STOA panel of the European Parliament entitled
Crowd Control Technologies -
http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publications/studies/19991401a_en.pdf

41) Jose M. R. Delgado: Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a
Psychocivilized
Society, 1969, USA

42) Russian weekly Argumenty I Fakty, number 32, August 2003, article
title: Versii ubiistva generala Rokhlina (Versions of Murder of General
Rokhlin)

43) Walter J. Freeman: Mass Action in the Nervous System, Academic Press,
New York, San Francisco, London, 1975

date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:12:39 +0100 author: Maurice Kellett