Could the Large Hadron Collider be sabotaging itself from the future, as some
physicists say

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/article6879293.ece

Any ideas on this one.

Hillary.

In article ,
no_one@nowandthen.co.uk (Hillary) wrote:

> 
> Could the Large Hadron Collider be sabotaging itself from the 
> future, as some
> physicists say
> 
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/arti
> cle6879293.ece
> 
> Any ideas on this one.
> 
> Hillary.
> 

I always had a little more respect for the Times because they didn't
print bin-fodder like that. This would have been more at home in the
Sunday Sport, together with the London buses in the ice caps, and WW11
bombers on the moon.! Then again, the average 'S.S.' reader has no idea
what, an LHC is, or CERN do.

 - Steve

On Oct 29, 8:27 am, j80k-v...@dea.spamcon.org (Steve) wrote:
> In article ,
>
> no_...@nowandthen.co.uk (Hillary) wrote:
>
> > Could the Large Hadron Collider be sabotaging itself from the
> > future, as some
> > physicists say
>
> >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/arti
> > cle6879293.ece
>
> > Any ideas on this one.
>
> > Hillary.
>
> I always had a little more respect for the Times because they didn't
> print bin-fodder like that. This would have been more at home in the
> Sunday Sport, together with the London buses in the ice caps, and WW11
> bombers on the moon.! Then again, the average 'S.S.' reader has no idea
> what, an LHC is, or CERN do.
>
>  - Steve

Hmmmmmmmmmm.............another person that doesnt seem to be aware
that the Times is now owned by Murdoch! All of the corporate media is
very poor when its comes to reporting objectively, the only real
difference being that the propaganda spewed out in the "quality" press
is a little more sophisticated than the gutter variety.