On May 19, 10:47 pm, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> ken  wrote:
>
> > As soon as matters concerning the 3 private individuals were
> > considered the matter was deservedly struck out as an abuse of
> > process................
>
> Bullshit.
>
> Mr Justice Eady made almost no reference to:
>
> 1. David Tilley
> 2. Paul Hancox
> 3. Christopher Stevens
>
> in his judgement. The entire case was considered on Bunt's ill-advised
> attempt to follow the money rather than the substance of his action. J.
> Eady observed that the three defendants listed above were the ones
> responsible for the libel and were the ones to pursue.
>
> "The Claimant is not deprived of access to justice. His remedies lie
> against the first to third Defendants (if he can establish the necessary
> ingredients in respect of each). They may not be persons of substance,
> such as to make it worthwhile pursuing them. "
>
> And he was certainly right there wasn't he "ken"? No one on that list
> was worth a dime hence no point in pursuing them for damages.

The only one to lose in this case was the claimant
himself.............he currently has a six figure bill for legal
costs, and has lost any scrap of credibility that he may have had
before commencing legal action against someone with a little knowledge
of the law, that wasnt provided by fuckwith barrack room lawyers
posting  on usenet.

k