|
|
|
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:07:16 -0000,
group: uk.local.glasgow
back
Bonfire night
It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of MUHAMMAD
! !
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:07:16 -0000
author: Pellucid
|
Re: Bonfire night
On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of MUHAMMAD
> ! !
Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
You should be ashamed (again).
Appalled regards,
Lou
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:02:44 -0800 (PST)
author: LouSmorals
|
Re: Bonfire night
"LouSmorals" wrote in message
news:28542a1d-f40a-461c-82e6-a6ad2dacfafb@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
>> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
>> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of
>> MUHAMMAD
>> ! !
>
> Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
> one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
> could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
> should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
>
> You should be ashamed (again).
>
> Appalled regards,
>
> Lou
>
Ali of course changed his name, from Cassius Clay to Muhammad
li, -Why? -it is obvious,... then, he probably did not even know about the
Irish side of his family, but of course knew all about the 'Black Power'
movement, which would see him as a front-man. So what is/was one of the
classic moves of protest about his white history/white subsumation, he
joined the 'Nation of Islam' otherwise known as the 'Black Muslims' who
inherently hated 'whites' and used the idea of Islam to distance themselves
from the evil 'whites', (christians). The fact that Clay has 'white' blood
in his family is something he has only acknowleged recently.
date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:14:38 -0000
author: Pellucid
|
Re: Bonfire night
In article , pellucid@total-
insanity.co.uk says...
> "LouSmorals" wrote in message
> news:28542a1d-f40a-461c-82e6-a6ad2dacfafb@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> > On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
> >> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
> >> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of
> >> MUHAMMAD
> >> ! !
> >
> > Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
> > one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
> > could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
> > should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
> >
> > You should be ashamed (again).
> >
> > Appalled regards,
> >
> > Lou
> >
> Ali of course changed his name, from Cassius Clay to Muhammad
> li, -Why? -it is obvious,... then, he probably did not even know about the
> Irish side of his family, but of course knew all about the 'Black Power'
> movement, which would see him as a front-man. So what is/was one of the
> classic moves of protest about his white history/white subsumation, he
> joined the 'Nation of Islam' otherwise known as the 'Black Muslims' who
> inherently hated 'whites'
Whoa there, huge leap of illogic detected. I never got the impression that
Ali hated whites. Which is odd, because you could argue it's the white guys
who run the boxing world who are responsible for the state he's in.
--
Halmyre
This is the most powerful sigfile in the world and will probably blow your
head clean off.
date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:22:43 -0000
author: Halmyre ess
|
Re: Bonfire night
Pellucid wrote:
> "LouSmorals" wrote in message
> news:28542a1d-f40a-461c-82e6-a6ad2dacfafb@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>> On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
>>> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
>>> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of
>>> MUHAMMAD
>>> ! !
>> Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
>> one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
>> could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
>> should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
>>
>> You should be ashamed (again).
>>
>> Appalled regards,
>>
>> Lou
>>
> Ali of course changed his name, from Cassius Clay to Muhammad
> li, -Why? -it is obvious,... then, he probably did not even know about the
> Irish side of his family, but of course knew all about the 'Black Power'
> movement, which would see him as a front-man. So what is/was one of the
> classic moves of protest about his white history/white subsumation, he
> joined the 'Nation of Islam' otherwise known as the 'Black Muslims' who
> inherently hated 'whites' and used the idea of Islam to distance themselves
> from the evil 'whites', (christians). The fact that Clay has 'white' blood
> in his family is something he has only acknowleged recently.
>
>
The Africans who were captured and sold (that it was by their fellow
Africans is not unknown to their modern descendents) to the 17th
century European traders to work as slaves on the plantations of the
Caribbean and North and South America were already Muslims. Christianity
never got down below the Tropic of Cancer until the early days of the
British Empire (or Spanish/French/Dutch). Before that, they had no
knowledge of the "white", European man's ways, much less any reason to
hate him before their enslavement. It's not just spite.
Jp
date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:19 -0500
author: JpinNY
|
Re: Bonfire night
JpinNY wrote:
> Pellucid wrote:
>> "LouSmorals" wrote in message
>> news:28542a1d-f40a-461c-82e6-a6ad2dacfafb@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
>>>> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
>>>> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of
>>>> MUHAMMAD
>>>> ! !
>>> Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
>>> one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
>>> could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
>>> should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
>>>
>>> You should be ashamed (again).
>>>
>>> Appalled regards,
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>> Ali of course changed his name, from Cassius Clay to Muhammad li,
>> -Why? -it is obvious,... then, he probably did not even know about
>> the Irish side of his family, but of course knew all about the 'Black
>> Power' movement, which would see him as a front-man. So what is/was
>> one of the classic moves of protest about his white history/white
>> subsumation, he joined the 'Nation of Islam' otherwise known as the
>> 'Black Muslims' who inherently hated 'whites' and used the idea of
>> Islam to distance themselves from the evil 'whites', (christians).
>> The fact that Clay has 'white' blood in his family is something he has
>> only acknowleged recently.
>>
>
> The Africans who were captured and sold (that it was by their fellow
> Africans is not unknown to their modern descendents) to the 17th
> century European traders to work as slaves on the plantations of the
> Caribbean and North and South America were already Muslims. Christianity
> never got down below the Tropic of Cancer until the early days of the
> British Empire (or Spanish/French/Dutch). Before that, they had no
> knowledge of the "white", European man's ways, much less any reason to
> hate him before their enslavement. It's not just spite.
>
> Jp
We have no idea whether the 'Irish side' of his family was either a
family of Irish bondsmen, (along with poor English, Scots and Welsh
bondsmen who were the forerunners of the conscripts who were sent to
Australia) of either gender forced to breed with Africans on
plantations, or the name of family who owned his forebears, and
possibly interbred without formal recognition of sons and daughters who
were children of African parents and European owners.
There is no reason to sneer at anyone's ancestry, but I can understand
why Muhammad Ali might want to think about it.
Jp
date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:16:35 -0500
author: JpinNY
|
Re: Bonfire night
"JpinNY" wrote in message news:hdal3q$aa$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Pellucid wrote:
>> "LouSmorals" wrote in message
>> news:28542a1d-f40a-461c-82e6-a6ad2dacfafb@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
>>>> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
>>>> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of MUHAMMAD
>>>> ! !
>>> Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
>>> one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
>>> could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
>>> should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
>>>
>>> You should be ashamed (again).
>>>
>>> Appalled regards,
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>> Ali of course changed his name, from Cassius Clay to Muhammad li, -Why? -it is obvious,... then, he probably did not even know
>> about the Irish side of his family, but of course knew all about the 'Black Power' movement, which would see him as a front-man.
>> So what is/was one of the classic moves of protest about his white history/white subsumation, he joined the 'Nation of Islam'
>> otherwise known as the 'Black Muslims' who inherently hated 'whites' and used the idea of Islam to distance themselves from the
>> evil 'whites', (christians). The fact that Clay has 'white' blood in his family is something he has only acknowleged recently.
>
> The Africans who were captured and sold (that it was by their fellow Africans is not unknown to their modern descendents) to the
> 17th century European traders to work as slaves on the plantations of the Caribbean and North and South America were already
> Muslims. Christianity never got down below the Tropic of Cancer until the early days of the British Empire (or
> Spanish/French/Dutch). Before that, they had no knowledge of the "white", European man's ways, much less any reason to hate him
> before their enslavement. It's not just spite.
>
> Jp
No, but it's a bit like the second world war. Never ending.
Wise old Chinese proverb : If you harp on the past, future never come.
Edith.
Muslims fought in the Indian army for the crown and the commonwealth.
date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:01:09 +0100
author: The Traveller
|
Re: Bonfire night
"JpinNY" wrote in message
news:hdal3q$aa$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Pellucid wrote:
>> "LouSmorals" wrote in message
>> news:28542a1d-f40a-461c-82e6-a6ad2dacfafb@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 5 Nov, 18:07, "Pellucid" wrote:
>>>> It is obvious that the burning effigies of the Pope on 5th Nov. is now
>>>> totally out of date, what we should be doing is burning effigies of
>>>> MUHAMMAD
>>>> ! !
>>> Now this is going too far!! His fight against Frazier in 1975 remains
>>> one of my great sporting memories, and as for Forman in '74, well who
>>> could forget that? There is no way that this great sporting legend
>>> should be put on a bonfire, it is absolutely disgraceful.
>>>
>>> You should be ashamed (again).
>>>
>>> Appalled regards,
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>> Ali of course changed his name, from Cassius Clay to Muhammad
>> i, -Why? -it is obvious,... then, he probably did not even know about
>> the Irish side of his family, but of course knew all about the 'Black
>> Power' movement, which would see him as a front-man. So what is/was one
>> of the classic moves of protest about his white history/white
>> subsumation, he joined the 'Nation of Islam' otherwise known as the
>> 'Black Muslims' who inherently hated 'whites' and used the idea of Islam
>> to distance themselves from the evil 'whites', (christians). The fact
>> that Clay has 'white' blood in his family is something he has only
>> acknowleged recently.
>
> The Africans who were captured and sold (that it was by their fellow
> Africans is not unknown to their modern descendents) to the 17th century
> European traders to work as slaves on the plantations of the Caribbean and
> North and South America were already Muslims. Christianity never got down
> below the Tropic of Cancer until the early days of the British Empire (or
> Spanish/French/Dutch). Before that, they had no knowledge of the "white",
> European man's ways, much less any reason to hate him before their
> enslavement. It's not just spite.
>
> Jp
You say that the enslaved Africans that were sold to the European Traders in
Africa were already Muslims, but that was not neccesarily the case, because
of course Islam was invented over 600 years after the invention of
Christianity. Also, the Africans often kept to their own beliefs. True, it
was the Arab (Muslim) traders that enslaved the Africans, and exported/sold
them to the West, and also to the East.
date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:48:51 -0000
author: Pellucid
|
|
|