In article <g9p6et$se4$2@aioe.org>, SHADRACK  
writes
>"(used to be) Fat Sam"  wrote in
>message news:g9p598$no1$1@aioe.org...
>> Christ Almighty. It says there you're only 65.
>> From the photos I've seen of you, I thought you were in your eighties.
>> Had a rough paper round Pete?
>
>It's not so long ago he was claiming to be 70 years old. He's able
>bodied enough to climb out of his VW van to hacksaw a lock of a gate,
>he said so in court.
>The question I would like answering Peter Turtill is, are you a liar or
>not?
>
>
>
>

You seem to be ignoring what little I saw (no pun intended) of the media 
coverage, which seemed to be favourable.
Surely the meeja only tells the truf? (Tee-hee-hee)
-- 
Misha
Free on-line, off-site backups?
<https://mozy.com/?ref=UK45Y5>

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:01:04 +0100, vg4cysss7001 
wrote:

>You seem to be ignoring what little I saw (no pun intended) of the media 
>coverage, which seemed to be favourable.
>Surely the meeja only tells the truf? (Tee-hee-hee)

The meeja did cover it quite fairly actually. However the story soon
disappeared off their web site:-)
pete
http://www.oss.org.uk

turtill@defmap.com wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:01:04 +0100, vg4cysss7001 
> wrote:
>
>> You seem to be ignoring what little I saw (no pun intended) of the
>> media coverage, which seemed to be favourable.
>> Surely the meeja only tells the truf? (Tee-hee-hee)
>
> The meeja did cover it quite fairly actually. However the story soon
> disappeared off their web site:-)
> pete
> http://www.oss.org.uk

Funny that.
That's exactly what used to happen to your usenet posts when you got 
frightenned your grandkids would learn what a dirty old paedo, and nasty bit 
of work you are.

Peter Turtill  wrote in message 
news:c1b3d45f1gdp5iibdf320tqoj5sgo52aik@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:01:04 +0100, vg4cysss7001 
> wrote:
>
>>You seem to be ignoring what little I saw (no pun intended) of the 
>>media
>>coverage, which seemed to be favourable.
>>Surely the meeja only tells the truf? (Tee-hee-hee)
>
> The meeja did cover it quite fairly actually. However the story soon
> disappeared off their web site:-)
> pete

Never mind "pete" I am sure when you commit your next criminal offence 
it will be reported and you can have your 3 minutes of fame. Or perhaps 
the Star had complaints about the photograph like, "who is that ugly 
bastard?"

If you want to contact Peter Turtill here's some of his email addresses, 
though why he wants so many is a debatable point.
---------
turtill@defmap.com
peterturtill@gmail.com
turtill@gmail.com
peterturtill@btopenworld.com
peter@suffolkrightsofway.co.uk
peterturtill@hotmail.com
peterturtill@yahoo.co.uk
turtill@hotmail.co.uk
turtill@hotmail.com
peter.turtill@oss.org.uk