If I understand the law correctly it is an offence to publicly slag off
a County Court Judge, or indeed any, Law Court Judge. If this be the
case then I venture to suggest that Peter Turtill is once again in
contempt of court.
<quote>
Can I request that my case is heard by another judge on the circuit
(if that is the correct terms) as I did not get on well with the judge
last time as he did not understand my case.
</quote>

What Peter Turtill is implying, in so many sarcastic words, is that the
Judge was thick and when he awarded £1,000 costs against Peter Turtill,
he was not being fair, in Turtill's opinion of course. As a decent,
upstanding citizen I believe it my duty to inform said Judge of Peter
Turtill's remarks.
--------------
Peter Turtill said in another place:
"You cannot libel a dead person".

On Nov 6, 9:39 pm, "Shadrack"  wrote:
> If I understand the law correctly it is an offence to publicly slag off
> a County Court Judge, or indeed any, Law Court Judge. If this be the
> case then I venture to suggest that Peter Turtill is once again in
> contempt of court.
> <quote>
> Can I request that my case is heard by another judge on the circuit
> (if that is the correct terms) as I did not get on well with the judge
> last time as he did not understand my case.
> </quote>
>
> What Peter Turtill is implying, in so many sarcastic words, is that the
> Judge was thick and when he awarded £1,000 costs against Peter Turtill,
> he was not being fair, in Turtill's opinion of course. As a decent,
> upstanding citizen I believe it my duty to inform said Judge of Peter
> Turtill's remarks.
> --------------
> Peter Turtill said in another place:
> "You cannot libel a dead person".

They are not just *think*, but a bunch of (bwitish) state sponsered
pedophiles that should be treated like the perverts that they are by
people in the community.

On Nov 7, 4:17 am, ecomania  wrote:
> On Nov 6, 9:39 pm, "Shadrack"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > If I understand the law correctly it is an offence to publicly slag off
> > a County Court Judge, or indeed any, Law Court Judge. If this be the
> > case then I venture to suggest that Peter Turtill is once again in
> > contempt of court.
> > <quote>
> > Can I request that my case is heard by another judge on the circuit
> > (if that is the correct terms) as I did not get on well with the judge
> > last time as he did not understand my case.
> > </quote>
>
> > What Peter Turtill is implying, in so many sarcastic words, is that the
> > Judge was thick and when he awarded £1,000 costs against Peter Turtill,
> > he was not being fair, in Turtill's opinion of course. As a decent,
> > upstanding citizen I believe it my duty to inform said Judge of Peter
> > Turtill's remarks.
> > --------------
> > Peter Turtill said in another place:
> > "You cannot libel a dead person".
>
> They are not just *think*, but a bunch of (bwitish) state sponsered
> pedophiles that should be treated like the perverts that they are by
> people in the community.

I.e completely and totally sent to coventry.

On Nov 7, 8:39 am, "Shadrack"  wrote:
> If I understand the law correctly it is an offence to publicly slag off
> a County Court Judge, or indeed any, Law Court Judge. If this be the
> case then I venture to suggest that Peter Turtill is once again in
> contempt of court.
> <quote>
> Can I request that my case is heard by another judge on the circuit
> (if that is the correct terms) as I did not get on well with the judge
> last time as he did not understand my case.
> </quote>
>
> What Peter Turtill is implying, in so many sarcastic words, is that the
> Judge was thick and when he awarded £1,000 costs against Peter Turtill,
> he was not being fair, in Turtill's opinion of course. As a decent,
> upstanding citizen I believe it my duty to inform said Judge of Peter
> Turtill's remarks.
> --------------
> Peter Turtill said in another place:
> "You cannot libel a dead person".

Oh it is and add my name to your complaint.