|
|
|
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:19:34 +0100,
group: uk.local.birmingham
back
Hiding the evidence
http://surfbaud.org/2009/10/18/surviving-a-major-data-loss/
Guy Fawkes blog Mk3
GF's little place on the web
Surviving a major data loss.
Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Ive been uum-ing and aah-ing about whether or not to write anything
about this, or wait until the new year when all the dust blows over and
I can finally tell all.
Suffice it to say, that in this day and age it is increasingly common
for child custody cases to take a sinister turn, by this I mean that it
is increasingly prevalent that allegations will be made regarding such
things as Domestic Violence, and Pornography, these are the WMD of the
modern age in Family courts.
As you will all know I have been using computers since the year dot, as
you are all also unavoidably aware, my home server based on a Cobalt RAQ
has been offline since early July (2009) which is to say the least very
unusual for someone as IT savvy as myself.
Even a major hardware or data loss might account for it GOING offline,
but it would not account for it STAYING offline, hardware is replaceable
and the old blog on said server often mentioned the importance of
regular backups that were then tested to work.
The fact is that the one form of data loss that I did not consider as a
realistic possibility was the (temporary) total loss of all my computers
and data, and indeed "premises"
There are several scenarios that can account for such a total outage,
the obvious ones are a fire and the subsequent effects of water
everywhere, there is also the rather obvious theft, but the fact is, I
could have survived either of these, data wise
I not only had redundant
hardware and many backups, I also had semi offsite backups in separate
buildings at my old "premises".
The one thing that I simply did not consider, even as a remote
possibility like fire or theft, which you think about, check your
security, and dismiss, was a possibility that literally did not occur to
me at all.
This seemed to me to be as remote as terrorists hijacking a 747 and
deliberately crashing it into your home, sure, that really will wipe
everything out, but it is so freakish there is no way such a possibility
will ever occur to you prior to the event.
So, anyway, I suffered a freakish and non predictable "data loss", all
my computers, all my data, all my backups, everything, is unavailable to
me at this time, and will remain so for some time yet.
It isnt just stuff like all your digital still and movie images which
of course contains all your family photos, it isnt just all your copies
of Operating Systems and Application Software, it isnt just archives of
projects you have worked on, it is also the last decade of emails,
correspondence, documents and data.
This latter part is what really messes up your day, apart from the quite
ordinary stuff like records of car insurance renwal dates and online
banking details, which can be anything from a minor annoyance to a major
inconvenience, what really, really, really messes up your day is the
fact that said data essentially comprises a sort of electronic diary and
historical record of what you have been doing day by day.
OK, if your house burns down or Al Gebra crash a 747 into it, it is most
unlikely you will need to know what you were doing on some particular
date a few years ago, but there are some circumstances when you could
seriously use access to said data, and you cant get at it.
And so, here is my message to you.
1. Sort out your really ESSENTIAL data, eg family photos,
correspondence, emails, etc.
2. Categorise them, and from each category create an archive, rar,
zip, tar, whatever, but nothing too fancy, nothing you cannot freely get
the unarchiving tools for.
If you feel the need, encrypt these archives.
3. Place at least two copies of each of these archives in physically
remote locations, perhaps one on a cheap, large footprint hosting
service such as Servage, and one rsynced or P2P or Nullsoft Waste or a
private Torrent, to a friends computer (you can do the same for them,
ideally create a pool of 4 or more of you, all holding copies.)
4. DO NOT TELL ANYONE (except the friend holding copies) that these
backups exist.
5. DO NOT TELL ANYONE if you hold backups for friends.
"Anyone" MEANS anyone, no fucking exceptions, especially not those who
are "near and dear" to you.
Then, when Bruce Willis fails to divert the comet from striking your
house, you will be able to get access to everything that is important,
after you beg, borrow or steal a laptop.
Depending on circumstances, this may literally make the difference
between surviving, and not surviving (and I do not use that word in a
data sense) a major data loss. If you do not do this today, you are a
complete bloody fool.
You have been warned.
You probably will not be as lucky as me, and when I can tell my story,
only then will you appreciate just how massive a part luck (or karma, or
divine intervention, if you prefer) played in my surviving a major data
loss.
DO NOT be tempted to think of this advice as putting on a parachute when
you board a plane, just in case.
A far, far, far better analogy is look and listen before you cross a
road. You may THINK you are already, but trust me, unless you have a
real, accessible, secret, dependable offsite backup strategy in place,
you are not.
For the record I am unable to offer such a thing to my friends and
associates at this time, so please do not ask me, yet.
Have phun.
Categories: Bugger
« Previous Post | Permalink
Post a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
*
Search
*
Feeds
o Blog RSS
o Comments RSS
o
Archives
+ October 2009
+ July 2009
o
Categories
+ Bugger (3)
o
Meta
+ Register
+ Log in
+ Valid XHTML
+ XFN
+ WordPress
Copyright ©2009 Guy Fawkes blog Mk3
The Content Blue Wordpress Theme 1.1 by Andrew Wolfe
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:19:34 +0100
author: Guy Fawkes Blog
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
Guy Fawkes Blog wrote:
> for someone as IT savvy as myself.
Pmsl!
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:06:56 +0100
author: Thomas
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
On Oct 18, 5:19 pm, Guy Fawkes Blog
wrote:
> http://surfbaud.org/2009/10/18/surviving-a-major-data-loss/
>
> Guy Fawkes blog Mk3
> GF's little place on the web
> Surviving a major data loss.
> Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 12:02 pm
>
> Ive been uum-ing and aah-ing about whether or not to write anything
> about this, or wait until the new year when all the dust blows over and
> I can finally tell all.
>
> Suffice it to say, that in this day and age it is increasingly common
> for child custody cases to take a sinister turn, by this I mean that it
> is increasingly prevalent that allegations will be made regarding such
> things as Domestic Violence, and Pornography, these are the WMD of the
> modern age in Family courts.
>
> As you will all know I have been using computers since the year dot, as
> you are all also unavoidably aware, my home server based on a Cobalt RAQ
> has been offline since early July (2009) which is to say the least very
> unusual for someone as IT savvy as myself.
>
> Even a major hardware or data loss might account for it GOING offline,
> but it would not account for it STAYING offline, hardware is replaceable
> and the old blog on said server often mentioned the importance of
> regular backups that were then tested to work.
>
> The fact is that the one form of data loss that I did not consider as a
> realistic possibility was the (temporary) total loss of all my computers
> and data, and indeed "premises"
>
> There are several scenarios that can account for such a total outage,
> the obvious ones are a fire and the subsequent effects of water
> everywhere, there is also the rather obvious theft, but the fact is, I
> could have survived either of these, data wise
I not only had redundant
> hardware and many backups, I also had semi offsite backups in separate
> buildings at my old "premises".
>
> The one thing that I simply did not consider, even as a remote
> possibility like fire or theft, which you think about, check your
> security, and dismiss, was a possibility that literally did not occur to
> me at all.
>
> This seemed to me to be as remote as terrorists hijacking a 747 and
> deliberately crashing it into your home, sure, that really will wipe
> everything out, but it is so freakish there is no way such a possibility
> will ever occur to you prior to the event.
>
> So, anyway, I suffered a freakish and non predictable "data loss", all
> my computers, all my data, all my backups, everything, is unavailable to
> me at this time, and will remain so for some time yet.
>
> It isnt just stuff like all your digital still and movie images which
> of course contains all your family photos, it isnt just all your copies
> of Operating Systems and Application Software, it isnt just archives of
> projects you have worked on, it is also the last decade of emails,
> correspondence, documents and data.
>
> This latter part is what really messes up your day, apart from the quite
> ordinary stuff like records of car insurance renwal dates and online
> banking details, which can be anything from a minor annoyance to a major
> inconvenience, what really, really, really messes up your day is the
> fact that said data essentially comprises a sort of electronic diary and
> historical record of what you have been doing day by day.
>
> OK, if your house burns down or Al Gebra crash a 747 into it, it is most
> unlikely you will need to know what you were doing on some particular
> date a few years ago, but there are some circumstances when you could
> seriously use access to said data, and you cant get at it.
>
> And so, here is my message to you.
>
> 1. Sort out your really ESSENTIAL data, eg family photos,
> correspondence, emails, etc.
> 2. Categorise them, and from each category create an archive, rar> zip, tar, whatever, but nothing too fancy, nothing you cannot freely get
> the unarchiving tools for.
> If you feel the need, encrypt these archives.
> 3. Place at least two copies of each of these archives in physically
> remote locations, perhaps one on a cheap, large footprint hosting
> service such as Servage, and one rsynced or P2P or Nullsoft Waste or a
> private Torrent, to a friends computer (you can do the same for them,
> ideally create a pool of 4 or more of you, all holding copies.)
> 4. DO NOT TELL ANYONE (except the friend holding copies) that these
> backups exist.
> 5. DO NOT TELL ANYONE if you hold backups for friends.
>
> "Anyone" MEANS anyone, no fucking exceptions, especially not those who
> are "near and dear" to you.
>
> Then, when Bruce Willis fails to divert the comet from striking your
> house, you will be able to get access to everything that is important,
> after you beg, borrow or steal a laptop.
>
> Depending on circumstances, this may literally make the difference
> between surviving, and not surviving (and I do not use that word in a
> data sense) a major data loss. If you do not do this today, you are a
> complete bloody fool.
>
> You have been warned.
>
> You probably will not be as lucky as me, and when I can tell my story,
> only then will you appreciate just how massive a part luck (or karma, or
> divine intervention, if you prefer) played in my surviving a major data
> loss.
>
> DO NOT be tempted to think of this advice as putting on a parachute when
> you board a plane, just in case.
>
> A far, far, far better analogy is look and listen before you cross a
> road. You may THINK you are already, but trust me, unless you have a
> real, accessible, secret, dependable offsite backup strategy in place,
> you are not.
>
> For the record I am unable to offer such a thing to my friends and
> associates at this time, so please do not ask me, yet.
>
> Have phun.
>
> Categories: Bugger
>
> « Previous Post | Permalink
> Post a Comment
>
> You must be logged in to post a comment.
>
> *
> Search
> *
> Feeds
> o Blog RSS
> o Comments RSS
> o
> Archives
> October 2009
> July 2009
> o
> Categories
> Bugger (3)
> o
> Meta
> Register
> Log in
> Valid XHTML
> XFN
> WordPress
>
> Copyright ©2009 Guy Fawkes blog Mk3
> The Content Blue Wordpress Theme 1.1 by Andrew Wolfe
None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
gets to hear of it..................
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
author: Kenneth
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
Kenneth wrote:
> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
> gets to hear of it..................
Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
raided by the police.
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:41:24 +0100
author: Jonathan Bryce ldomain
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> Kenneth wrote:
>
>> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
>> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
>> gets to hear of it..................
>
> Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
> raided by the police.
Bunt claims to have never had a credit card so that is one defence he is
fucked for.
A condition of bail is that John Bunt does not go near the teenage queen
or the kid.
Her relatives are a little upset about her being attacked to say the least.
Very very deep shit (with blood) is forecast.
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:43:24 +0100
author: Jones
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
On Oct 18, 6:43 pm, Jones wrote:
> Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> > Kenneth wrote:
>
> >> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
> >> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
> >> gets to hear of it..................
>
> > Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
> > raided by the police.
>
> Bunt claims to have never had a credit card so that is one defence he is
> fucked for.
>
> A condition of bail is that John Bunt does not go near the teenage queen
> or the kid.
>
> Her relatives are a little upset about her being attacked to say the least.
>
> Very very deep shit (with blood) is forecast.
bunty couldnt have attacked her...........it says so on his
blog................lol
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
author: Kenneth
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
Jones wrote:
> Jonathan Bryce wrote:
>> Kenneth wrote:
>>
>>> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
>>> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
>>> gets to hear of it..................
>>
>> Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
>> raided by the police.
>
> Bunt claims to have never had a credit card so that is one defence he is
> fucked for.
>
> A condition of bail is that John Bunt does not go near the teenage queen
> or the kid.
>
> Her relatives are a little upset about her being attacked to say the least.
>
> Very very deep shit (with blood) is forecast.
>
>
I do hope that the young lady has access to John Bunts previous posts
where he was boasting of selling drugs which he bought from bent coppers
and his plans to cause explosions.
Then there was the little matter of him threatening a guy with an hammer
over a parking issue not to mention his liking for underage girls.
'PHWOARRRRRRR!' indeed eh Johnny?
I'm sure this will do his 'custody battle' no end of good!
Now let's just find an address for Exeter Social Services who will no
doubt already be involved and the paperwork/exhibits can start rolling
in to them.
Oh, I forgot they already know John Bunt. He was admonished by them for
his sexual antics of playing 'smackybums' with a child.
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:28:31 +0100
author: Derek
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
On Oct 18, 8:28 pm, Derek wrote:
> Jones wrote:
> > Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> >> Kenneth wrote:
>
> >>> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
> >>> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
> >>> gets to hear of it..................
>
> >> Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
> >> raided by the police.
>
> > Bunt claims to have never had a credit card so that is one defence he is
> > fucked for.
>
> > A condition of bail is that John Bunt does not go near the teenage queen
> > or the kid.
>
> > Her relatives are a little upset about her being attacked to say the least.
>
> > Very very deep shit (with blood) is forecast.
>
> I do hope that the young lady has access to John Bunts previous posts
> where he was boasting of selling drugs which he bought from bent coppers
> and his plans to cause explosions.
>
> Then there was the little matter of him threatening a guy with an hammer
> over a parking issue not to mention his liking for underage girls.
> 'PHWOARRRRRRR!' indeed eh Johnny?
>
> I'm sure this will do his 'custody battle' no end of good!
>
> Now let's just find an address for Exeter Social Services who will no
> doubt already be involved and the paperwork/exhibits can start rolling
> in to them.
>
> Oh, I forgot they already know John Bunt. He was admonished by them for
> his sexual antics of playing 'smackybums' with a child.
It would actually be worth sending social services copies of buntys
posts on here, as well as a synopsis of the court case where one of
his claims was that he was in actual fact impotent, as a result of
hancox's usenet attacks against him.
The court case is certainly representative of the fact that bunty is
deeply dishonest, and also perhaps deserves to be sectioned rather
than be entrusted with the welfare of a young
child.....................
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
author: Kenneth
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
On Oct 18, 9:02 pm, Kenneth wrote:
> On Oct 18, 8:28 pm, Derek wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jones wrote:
> > > Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> > >> Kenneth wrote:
>
> > >>> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme> > >>> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
> > >>> gets to hear of it..................
>
> > >> Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
> > >> raided by the police.
>
> > > Bunt claims to have never had a credit card so that is one defence he is
> > > fucked for.
>
> > > A condition of bail is that John Bunt does not go near the teenage queen
> > > or the kid.
>
> > > Her relatives are a little upset about her being attacked to say the least.
>
> > > Very very deep shit (with blood) is forecast.
>
> > I do hope that the young lady has access to John Bunts previous posts
> > where he was boasting of selling drugs which he bought from bent coppers
> > and his plans to cause explosions.
>
> > Then there was the little matter of him threatening a guy with an hammer
> > over a parking issue not to mention his liking for underage girls.
> > 'PHWOARRRRRRR!' indeed eh Johnny?
>
> > I'm sure this will do his 'custody battle' no end of good!
>
> > Now let's just find an address for Exeter Social Services who will no
> > doubt already be involved and the paperwork/exhibits can start rolling
> > in to them.
>
> > Oh, I forgot they already know John Bunt. He was admonished by them for
> > his sexual antics of playing 'smackybums' with a child.
>
> It would actually be worth sending social services copies of buntys
> posts on here, as well as a synopsis of the court case where one of
> his claims was that he was in actual fact impotent, as a result of
> hancox's usenet attacks against him.
>
> The court case is certainly representative of the fact that bunty is
> deeply dishonest, and also perhaps deserves to be sectioned rather
> than be entrusted with the welfare of a young
> child.....................- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Little fat pervert , your time is almost up
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
author: Dragon Slayer
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
On Oct 18, 9:57 pm, Dragon Slayer wrote:
> On Oct 18, 9:02 pm, Kenneth wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 18, 8:28 pm, Derek wrote:
>
> > > Jones wrote:
> > > > Jonathan Bryce wrote:
> > > >> Kenneth wrote:
>
> > > >>> None of thats likely to be a problem unless you got off on "extreme"
> > > >>> porn and after downloading same over a period of several years, plod
> > > >>> gets to hear of it..................
>
> > > >> Or your credit card gets stolen and used on a porn site which is later
> > > >> raided by the police.
>
> > > > Bunt claims to have never had a credit card so that is one defence he is
> > > > fucked for.
>
> > > > A condition of bail is that John Bunt does not go near the teenage queen
> > > > or the kid.
>
> > > > Her relatives are a little upset about her being attacked to say the least.
>
> > > > Very very deep shit (with blood) is forecast.
>
> > > I do hope that the young lady has access to John Bunts previous posts
> > > where he was boasting of selling drugs which he bought from bent coppers
> > > and his plans to cause explosions.
>
> > > Then there was the little matter of him threatening a guy with an hammer
> > > over a parking issue not to mention his liking for underage girls.
> > > 'PHWOARRRRRRR!' indeed eh Johnny?
>
> > > I'm sure this will do his 'custody battle' no end of good!
>
> > > Now let's just find an address for Exeter Social Services who will no
> > > doubt already be involved and the paperwork/exhibits can start rolling
> > > in to them.
>
> > > Oh, I forgot they already know John Bunt. He was admonished by them for
> > > his sexual antics of playing 'smackybums' with a child.
>
> > It would actually be worth sending social services copies of buntys
> > posts on here, as well as a synopsis of the court case where one of
> > his claims was that he was in actual fact impotent, as a result of
> > hancox's usenet attacks against him.
>
> > The court case is certainly representative of the fact that bunty is
> > deeply dishonest, and also perhaps deserves to be sectioned rather
> > than be entrusted with the welfare of a young
> > child.....................- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Little fat pervert , your time is almost up
Fuck off you cowardly cunt............go back under that stone and get
your tongue up buntys arse!
date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
author: Kenneth
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
Kenneth wrote:
>> Little fat pervert , your time is almost up
>
> Fuck off you cowardly cunt............go back under that stone and get
> your tongue up buntys arse!
Cuntox is calling Chris a pervert but it's Cuntox who walks around in
stockings and suspenders, is always in the gay newsgroups and gets
himself in shit for calling people paedophiles. That's rich!
date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:23:39 +0100
author: Don
|
Re: Hiding the evidence
On Oct 19, 10:23 am, Don wrote:
> Kenneth wrote:
> >> Little fat pervert , your time is almost up
>
> > Fuck off you cowardly cunt............go back under that stone and get
> > your tongue up buntys arse!
>
> Cuntox is calling Chris a pervert but it's Cuntox who walks around in
> stockings and suspenders, is always in the gay newsgroups and gets
> himself in shit for calling people paedophiles. That's rich!
Anyone who willingly licks the ass of a nasty little scroat like bunt
deserves to be seen for exactly what they are!
date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
author: Kenneth
|
UGG 2009 the latest style
<p><a href="http://www.leahyugg.com/ugg-classic-cardy-boots-c-2.html">UGG
Classic Cardy</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.leahyugg.com/ugg-bailey-button-boots-c-110.html">UGG
Bailey Button</a></p>
<p>Welcome my friend ,you can buy <strong>Discount UGG Boots </strong>,
<strong>Cheap UGGS Sale</strong> and enjoy Free Shipping ,1Week Delivery all
over the world and more discount.</p>
<p>http://www.leahyugg.com/</p>
<p>Buy any two pairs of UGG Boots, a pair of UGG Classic Cardy Boots 5819
as free gifts!</p>
<p>UGG 2009 the latest style , favourable price and top-quality.</p>
url:http://www.myreader.co.uk/msg/10681204.aspx
date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:07:56 +0800
author: jeeland smith
|
|
|