http://tinyurl.com/6yuzbc

It's ace.

-- 

Zo
Gamerscore whore and proud (and not very good at it)

"Zomoniac"  wrote in message 
news:6hn23hFn4jdfU1@mid.individual.net...
> http://tinyurl.com/6yuzbc
>
> It's ace.

If it's the same as the one that was released on the Xbox 360 then it's a 
bit shit.

On Aug 28, 5:42 pm, "Michael C"  wrote:
> "Zomoniac"  wrote in message
>
> news:6hn23hFn4jdfU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/6yuzbc
>
> > It's ace.
>
> If it's the same as the one that was released on the Xbox 360 then it's a
> bit shit.

It's got a much better underlying structure, but the game is pretty
much identical.

"hurricanepilot"  wrote in message 
news:ffefc3b9-4e5a-4288-a334-ab56b5cdf395@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 28, 5:42 pm, "Michael C"  wrote:
>> "Zomoniac"  wrote in message
>>
>> If it's the same as the one that was released on the Xbox 360 then it's a
>> bit shit.
>
> It's got a much better underlying structure, but the game is pretty
> much identical.

The problem I had was that it was stupidly easy for ages and then all of a 
sudden became really hard with the CPU cars cheating.  I don't see the point 
in a game doing that.

On 2008-08-29 17:59:44 +0100, "Michael C"  said:

> "hurricanepilot"  wrote in message 
> news:ffefc3b9-4e5a-4288-a334-ab56b5cdf395@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On 
> 
>> Aug 28, 5:42 pm, "Michael C"  wrote:
>>> "Zomoniac"  wrote in message
>>> 
>>> If it's the same as the one that was released on the Xbox 360 then it's a
>>> bit shit.
>> 
>> It's got a much better underlying structure, but the game is pretty
>> much identical.
> 
> The problem I had was that it was stupidly easy for ages and then all 
> of a sudden became really hard with the CPU cars cheating.  I don't see 
> the point in a game doing that.

In your first post I just thought you were plain wrong. But that's a 
perfectly valid criticism, it pissed me off too, spending 20 hours 
breezing through 6 only to hit a wall. Which is a great shame, as the 
underlying game is so great.

-- 

Zo

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:58:23 +0100, Zomoniac
 wrote:

>On 2008-08-29 17:59:44 +0100, "Michael C"  said:
>
>> "hurricanepilot"  wrote in message 
>> news:ffefc3b9-4e5a-4288-a334-ab56b5cdf395@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>On 
>> 
>>> Aug 28, 5:42 pm, "Michael C"  wrote:
>>>> "Zomoniac"  wrote in message
>>>> 
>>>> If it's the same as the one that was released on the Xbox 360 then it's a
>>>> bit shit.
>>> 
>>> It's got a much better underlying structure, but the game is pretty
>>> much identical.
>> 
>> The problem I had was that it was stupidly easy for ages and then all 
>> of a sudden became really hard with the CPU cars cheating.  I don't see 
>> the point in a game doing that.
>
>In your first post I just thought you were plain wrong. But that's a 
>perfectly valid criticism, it pissed me off too, spending 20 hours 
>breezing through 6 only to hit a wall. Which is a great shame, as the 
>underlying game is so great.

it's still not as good as the 2 PSP RR's though.
-- 

http://bykerblog.wordpress.com/ - My thrilling new blog
XBL Tag: Chrisflynnuk