|
|
|
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 5, 6:07?pm, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 5:41?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 5:01?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > In order to put this tidal radius grip or Newtonian binding force into
> > > context, it?s good to draw upon whatever we ob ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 5, 5:41?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 5:01?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In order to put this tidal radius grip or Newtonian binding force into
> > context, it?s good to draw upon whatever we objectively know to be the
> > case.
>
> > TNOs like Sedna, m ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 5, 5:01?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In order to put this tidal radius grip or Newtonian binding force into
> context, it?s good to draw upon whatever we objectively know to be the
> case.
>
> TNOs like Sedna, multiple thousands of SDOs and even a few of the
> larger OCOs (Ort Cloud Objects) ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 05:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
In order to put this tidal radius grip or Newtonian binding force into
context, it?s good to draw upon whatever we objectively know to be the
case.
TNOs like Sedna, multiple thousands of SDOs and even a few of the
larger OCOs (Ort Cloud Objects) are no longer hard to find within the
radii of our Oort cloud, tha ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Considering that we're still managing to hold onto Sedna;
current (solar system) ~ Sedna/aphelion gravitational attraction:
2.02e30 and 4.7e21 kg at 1.459e14 m = 2.975e13 N
Whereas Sirius has been holding onto us;
current (solar system) ~ Sirius gravitational force of attraction:
2.02e30 and 6.9615e30 kg at ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
How could the Sirius B helium flashover not have affected us?
How could the tidal radii of the Sirius star/solar system not have our
solar system within its control?
How could the original molecular cloud as having given birth to the
extremely vibrant Sirius star/solar system have gone through our part
of thi ...
|
M101 with detailed map
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:37:19 +0200
Hi all,
I have the pleasure to present a new shots the galaxy M101 made in the
M. Amiata (1450m) - Italy - performed by Takahashi BRC250 joined the
ccd ST-10XME.
Home page: http://www.danilopivato.com/
The data recovery technicians are available here:
http://www.danilopivato.com/tabulae_coeli/1400_n60/m101_b ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 3, 5:41?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sirius and us(our solar system) are inseparable, at least according to
> the regular laws of physics pertaining to the laws of gravity and
> orbital mechanics that seems more than sufficient, especially if
> little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radi ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sirius and us(our solar system) are inseparable, at least according to
the regular laws of physics pertaining to the laws of gravity and
orbital mechanics that seems more than sufficient, especially if
little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e11 km
that?s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereas Sirius ...
|
|
|
