|
|
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Tue, 19 May 2009 05:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
On May 18, 7:01?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 1:31?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> > > only a few public images of whatever is withi ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Mon, 18 May 2009 07:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
On May 17, 1:31?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> > only a few public images of whatever is within 1000 light years seem
> > to exist that fit within the color satur ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 17 May 2009 13:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> only a few public images of whatever is within 1000 light years seem
> to exist that fit within the color saturated eye-candy profiles that
> we?ve been taught to accept. ?However, the ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 17 May 2009 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> only a few public images of whatever is within 1000 light years seem
> to exist that fit within the color saturated eye-candy profiles that
> we?ve been taught to accept. ?However, the ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 17 May 2009 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> only a few public images of whatever is within 1000 light years seem
> to exist that fit within the color saturated eye-candy profiles that
> we?ve been taught to accept. ?However, the ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sat, 16 May 2009 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> only a few public images of whatever is within 1000 light years seem
> to exist that fit within the color saturated eye-candy profiles that
> we?ve been taught to accept. ?However, the ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sat, 16 May 2009 10:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little hard to come by, as
> only a few public images of whatever is within 1000 light years seem
> to exist that fit within the color saturated eye-candy profiles that
> we?ve been taught to accept. ?However, the ...
|
UK amateur radio astronomers
Sat, 16 May 2009 14:45:50 GMT
Does anyone know if there's an online community for UK amateur radio
astronomers? ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sat, 16 May 2009 06:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
On May 15, 9:10?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 15, 6:23 am, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
>
> > Matt BG is hung up on Sirius B ? I have a picture of this white dwarf
> > and it is about twice the size of Earth. I am sure their are more Sirius
> > B dwarfs than even Sun like ...
|
Important Notice (On Behalf of the Administrator)
Sat, 16 May 2009 02:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
I saw posts on Astronomy and Members' night sky observations, but what
are the things between all these are unwanted spam messages.
I know everyone hates spam, in fact the spam messages that I saw have
completely nothing to do with Astronomy, if you have realised it. They
might be trapping nets to unlucky victim ...
|
|
|
