|
|
|
Re: A mysterious bright star will appear in the sky visible to all -
within days
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 19, 12:20?pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:06:36 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Jun 19, 8:55?am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:24:44 -0800 (PST), RH <halcon7r...@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
|
Re: A mysterious bright star will appear in the sky visible to all -
within days
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 20, 7:29?am, "Hagar" <ha...@sahm.name> wrote:
> Don't be so hard on our resident "Ditz". ?GuthBall is always good for a
> chuckle.
>
> > Total babble.
>
> He's still learning English, you see .... funded by the "No ditz left
> behind" program of our new Messiah
His bright ball in the sky seems somew ...
|
Re: A mysterious bright star will appear in the sky visible to all -
within days
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 19, 8:55?am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:24:44 -0800 (PST), RH <halcon7r...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Dear Readers:
>
> >It is logical for you not to expect anything to materialize that can't
> >be easily ignored or explained away. ?You don't expect any major
> >ch ...
|
Re: A mysterious bright star will appear in the sky visible to all - within days
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:55:07 +0200
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:24:44 -0800 (PST), RH <halcon7roho@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Dear Readers:
>
>It is logical for you not to expect anything to materialize that can't
>be easily ignored or explained away. You don't expect any major
>changes in the world, or for world peace to ever come because you've
>become co ...
|
Losmandy G11 Mount+ Gemini GOTO
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:44:24 +0100
Hi Group,
I have recently obtained one of these mounts. I find that I can input
the longitude and latitude information OK, but when I input the time,
the handset reverts to the original figures showing; 0606:00:00:
00:00:00. I have tried "Cold Start", " Warm Start" and even "Warm
Restart" all to no avail.
...
|
Observing by listening
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:50:55 GMT
A question from an ignorant layman...
Whenever I read about radio astronomy, I see the observations presented
as either graphs or multi-coloured maps of the sky. Do radio
astronomers ever observe by donning a pair of headphones? ...
|
widespread Carolina Bay type craters from Clovis comet 12,900 Ya BP?
-- 0.7 M long NS crater with fractured red sandstone on SW rim, CR C 53A, 20
miles E of Las Vegas, NM: Rich Murray 2009.06.08
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
widespread Carolina Bay type craters from Clovis comet 12,900 Ya BP?
-- 0.7 M long NS crater with fractured red sandstone on SW rim, CR C
53A, 20 miles E of Las Vegas, NM: Rich Murray 2009.06.08
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.htm
Monday, June 8, 2009
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/27
...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 8, 4:00?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The wobble of a .05<.06 solar mass of something is there to behold,
> but you certainly don't have to look if you don't want to.
... and your source for this is what? I've already given you one
source, there are many more. And, there are many really w ...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 8, 2:52?pm, pnals...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 8, 11:33?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, you're saying that gravity is what primarily creates stars and
>
> > gravity is also what keeps stars (regardless of however near one
> > another) apart?
>
> I didn't say that at all. True, gravity i ...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 8, 11:33?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
So, you're saying that gravity is what primarily creates stars and
> gravity is also what keeps stars (regardless of however near one
> another) apart?
I didn't say that at all. True, gravity is responsible for star
formation. It is actually the lack of ...
|
|
|
