|
|
|
Re: Dual mono vs. mono mono interrogative...
Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:29:54 GMT
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 07:28:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com>
wrote:
>"Don Pearce" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
>news:4af7d23b.377748187@news.eternal-september.org
>>
>> Effects then Stereo Imagery
>
>"Stereo Imagery" is not in CEP 2.1 Effects. That was the last version of
>CEP.
>
>I wonder in ...
|
Re: Dual mono vs. mono mono interrogative...
Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:21:13 GMT
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:17:55 -0000, "Keith G" <ksg@moirac.adsl24.co.uk>
wrote:
>> The tracks are still numbered, named and findable. It is just that
>> when you play the whole thing you don't hear the joins. It sounds
>> exactly like the LP.
>
>
>
>If I want to hear 'exactly like the LP' - I play the LP..!! ...
|
Re: Dual mono vs. mono mono interrogative...
Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:39:43 GMT
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:35:54 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
<noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <YkjJm.36688$La7.9648@uutiset.elisa.fi>, Iain Churches
><IainNG@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
>
>> "Jim Lesurf" <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:50b6744a0dnoise@audiomisc.co.uk...
>
>> > FWIW what prompted t ...
|
FA: Thorens 124 MK II in B&O Beogram 3000 * RARE * STUNNING
Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:31:42 +0100
Info and photos at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=230396958577
...
|
Re: Dual mono vs. mono mono interrogative...
Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:03:38 GMT
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:51:31 +0200, "Iain Churches"
<IainNG@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
>
>"Jim Lesurf" <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:50b6744a0dnoise@audiomisc.co.uk...
>
>> FWIW what prompted this was someone saying it was a good idea to always
>> normalise so the max came to -0.5dBFS. I was then po ...
|
Re: Dual mono vs. mono mono interrogative...
Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:25:47 GMT
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:09:41 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
<noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <4af7499c.342773859@news.eternal-september.org>, Don Pearce
><spam@spam.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:02:21 GMT, spam@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:
>
>> >On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:46:40 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
...
|
Re: Opinion needed re power amp building
Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:58:23 +0000
spam@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:28:31 +0000, David Pitt <news@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>
[snip]
> >
> > Perreaux kit may be cheap and common in Australia, where Trevor is. From
> > the Perreaux site the ¨¦loquence range, which uses MOSFET output devices,
> > give an output that is "dynam ...
|
Re: Opinion needed re power amp building
Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:30:30 GMT
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:28:31 +0000, David Pitt <news@pittdj.co.uk>
wrote:
>Jim Lesurf <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> In article <mpro.ksp4sk00002aa00ri.news@pittdj.co.uk>, David Pitt
>> <news@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Jim Lesurf <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > > In article <7lh581F3d5ef5U3@mid.in ...
|
BBC AAC Internet radio streams on Squeezebox
Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:51:26 -0000
Michael Chare asked on here a few weeks ago about whether it was
possible to receive the BBC's AAC Internet radio streams on any
Wi-Fi-Internet radio devices, so I thought some of you might be
interested to know they are now available on the Squeezebox if you
install the Squeezebox's iPlayer plug-in.
Some o ...
|
RF Interference rejection by mains cables
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:35:35 +0000 (GMT)
Hi,
I've just put up a new webpage at
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/cables/mains/StringTheory.html
This looks at the idea that 'special' mains cables might be useful because
they act as a form of 'RF Interference rejection filter'.
Was meaning to produce this a while ago, but got distracted, so the round
tu ...
|
|
|
