|
|
|
Co-worker has accident, who is at fault?
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:02:40 GMT
Hello, a co-worker has an accident today.
She was stationary, second in line (i.e. one car in front), waiting to
join a round-about.
The round-about becomes clear, so car in front pulls away, so she moves
forwards, checks it is still clear to the right, which it is, so she
begins to pull away and returns her vi ...
|
Re: 110mph in a 30mph zone!!
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:47:05 -0000
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:06:47 +0100, Ed Chilada <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:38:10 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:23:48 +0100, Ed Chilada <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:57:05 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com>
>>> w ...
|
Re: Three out of five existing drivers would fail current driving
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
On 29 Oct, 12:16, ChelseaTractorMan <mr.c.trac...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:47:39 ? (UTC), boltar2...@yahoo.co.uk
> wrote:
>
> >Thats a good analogy , I'll have to remember that one :)
>
> as long as you accept the remote costs ¡ê2000 and ¡ê10 a week.
> --
> Mike. .. .
> Gone beyond the ul ...
|
Speedo over-read?
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:22:43 +0000
After checking my speedo readings at different
speeds with my new sat nav, I noted that it
over-reads by a constant 3mph from 30mph through
to 70.
I thought that most speedos vary by a percentage?
ie: say 3mph at 30, going up to about 6 or 7mph
over-read at 70.
Is this unusual?
Bod ...
|
Re: If I took a driving test today
29 Oct 2009 22:12:38 GMT
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:11:27 +0000, MrBitsy proclaimed:
> "Bod" <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:7kuhfjF3bldsjU1@mid.individual.net...
>> MrBitsy wrote:
>>> "Mike P" <privacy@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>> news:7ku6pjF3bavhoU4@mid.individual.net...
>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:48:43 +0000, Bo ...
|
Re: If I took a driving test today
29 Oct 2009 22:09:25 GMT
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:04:00 +0000, MrBitsy proclaimed:
> "Mike P" <privacy@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:7kuh6lF3apucnU6@mid.individual.net...
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:51:35 +0000, MrBitsy proclaimed:
>>
>>> "Bod" <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:7ku6cbF3ardj3U3@mid.individual.net... ...
|
Re: If I took a driving test today
29 Oct 2009 22:02:14 GMT
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:58:10 +0000, Bod proclaimed:
> MrBitsy wrote:
>> "Mike P" <privacy@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:7ku6pjF3bavhoU4@mid.individual.net...
>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:48:43 +0000, Bod proclaimed:
>>>
>>>> MrBitsy wrote:
>>>>> "ChelseaTractorMan" <mr.c.tractor@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in ...
|
Re: If I took a driving test today
29 Oct 2009 21:53:25 GMT
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:51:35 +0000, MrBitsy proclaimed:
> "Bod" <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:7ku6cbF3ardj3U3@mid.individual.net...
>> MrBitsy wrote:
>>> "ChelseaTractorMan" <mr.c.tractor@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:9d6je5pe8srbobhnk3v66l7bim32oshvse@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> I look, ...
|
Re: If I took a driving test today
29 Oct 2009 19:15:52 GMT
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:01:42 +0000, Bod proclaimed:
> Mike P wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:48:43 +0000, Bod proclaimed:
>>
>>> MrBitsy wrote:
>>>> "ChelseaTractorMan" <mr.c.tractor@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:9d6je5pe8srbobhnk3v66l7bim32oshvse@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>> I look, then signal
>>>> ...
|
When is 14 days not 14 days?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:58:03 -0000
A: When it's 16.
The High Court has ruled that when an NIP is sent out, it must arrive within
14 days of the alleged offence, not just be sent within 14 days:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/8332523.stm. Could prove
interesting how this plays out?
...
|
|
|
