|
|
|
Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:06:33 +0000
On 12 Nov 2009 20:32:25 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> wrote:
>Tony <toneyharoldsmith@virgin.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>they were saying:
>
>>>> A 20 limit outside a school is far too *high* a speed
>
>>> Umm, why?
>
>> Derrrrrrrrr because kids tend to run out and wander in roads. One at ...
|
Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:05:44 +0000
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:54:50 -0000, Tony <toneyharoldsmith@virgin.net>
wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:45:46 -0000, Adrian <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tony <toneyharoldsmith@virgin.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>> they were saying:
>>
>>> A 20 limit outside a school is far too *high* a speed ...
|
Re: 110mph in a 30mph zone!!
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:11:15 -0000
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:16:24 -0000, Ed Chilada <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:53:46 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:06:47 +0100, Ed Chilada <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:34:19 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com>
>>> w ...
|
Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars
13 Nov 2009 12:39:55 GMT
Robert <robroyhome@talktalk.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:
>> Which is why 2 year olds need to be under 100% supervision by a
>> responsible adult at all times that they are in such a risk situation.
> Absolutely but I am sure that any child of yours as mine did will
> occasionally ...
|
Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:29:22 -0000
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:20:46 -0000, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:52 -0000, Robert <robroyhome@talktalk.net>
> wrote:
>
>>>> Dont forget - it is not just you who cannot see the child but the
>>>> child
>>>> who cannot see you.
>
>>> Of course they can - IF they follow the ...
|
Re: All car drivers are criminals
13 Nov 2009 12:28:58 GMT
%steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:
>> This was never, ever going to be "insurance-only". Not with a car
>> sitting disabled in the middle of the M-way just before a foggy morning
>> commute o'clock.
> Humm, I think you're wrong on that one. I've seen many, ...
|
Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:20:46 +0000
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:52 -0000, Robert <robroyhome@talktalk.net>
wrote:
>>> Dont forget - it is not just you who cannot see the child but the child
>>> who cannot see you.
>> Of course they can - IF they follow the GXC properly.
>I doubt that a 2 year old would be able to read it.
Which is why 2 year ...
|
Re: All car drivers are criminals
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:11:37 +0000
Adrian <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This was never, ever going to be "insurance-only". Not with a car sitting
> disabled in the middle of the M-way just before a foggy morning commute
> o'clock.
Humm, I think you're wrong on that one. I've seen many, many accidents
on the motorway in fog/driving rain/ ...
|
Re: Lorry drivers not moving forward in a queue of traffic
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:07:14 +0000
[Default] On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:03:55 -0000, a certain chimpanzee,
"Martin" <me@privacy.net>, randomly hit the keyboard and wrote:
>I'm reminded of a Phill Nice sketch (remember that rubber-faced
>impressionist from the 1990s) in which he described the L1 driver staring
>fixedly ahead and totally ignoring the ...
|
Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:59:26 +0000
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:54:50 -0000, Tony <toneyharoldsmith@virgin.net>
wrote:
>>> A 20 limit outside a school is far too *high* a speed
>>
>> Umm, why?
>
>Derrrrrrrrr because kids tend to run out and wander in roads. One at a
>time is one thing but hundreds of the little darlings....
But does that apply ...
|
|
|
