|
|
|
Re: Not Doug
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:40:50 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 18, 10:04?am, BrianW <brianwhiteh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 Nov, 07:41, Adrian <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Doug <jag...@riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> > saying:
>
> > >> You seem to be forgetting one thing, Duhg. EVERYBODY here is quite
> > >> happy and wi ...
|
Re: Not Doug
18 Nov 2009 11:25:10 GMT
BrianW <brianwhitehead@hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:
>> >> If you posted into an unused group, and nobody read it, would you
>> >> still be utterly wrong?
>> > Interesting question. ??Quantum physics would dictate that in such
>> > circumstances, the post would be a superp ...
|
Re: Not Doug
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:14:15 -0800 (PST)
On 18 Nov, 10:12, Adrian <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BrianW <brianwhiteh...@hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
> >> If you posted into an unused group, and nobody read it, would you still
> >> be utterly wrong?
> > Interesting question. ?Quantum physics would dictate that ...
|
Cyclist turning right.
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:44:40 -0800 (PST)
This horrifying but all too familiar situation is clearly shown in the
cartoon by Brick.
http://www.brickbats.co.uk/Cartoons/Roadhog.gif
--
Critical Mass London
http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk
"Get out of my way you f*ing cyclist". ...
|
Re: Not Doug
18 Nov 2009 10:12:07 GMT
BrianW <brianwhitehead@hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:
>> If you posted into an unused group, and nobody read it, would you still
>> be utterly wrong?
> Interesting question. Quantum physics would dictate that in such
> circumstances, the post would be a superposition of "u ...
|
Re: Not Doug
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:04:33 -0800 (PST)
On 18 Nov, 07:41, Adrian <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Doug <jag...@riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>
> >> You seem to be forgetting one thing, Duhg. EVERYBODY here is quite
> >> happy and willing to condemn bad driving.
> > Problem is, Adrain, what they class as bad drivin ...
|
Re: Not Doug
18 Nov 2009 07:41:18 GMT
Doug <jagmad@riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:
>> You seem to be forgetting one thing, Duhg. EVERYBODY here is quite
>> happy and willing to condemn bad driving.
> Problem is, Adrain, what they class as bad driving is strictly limited,
No, it's quite straightforward.
Any d ...
|
Re: More bad news in London
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:20:51 -0800 (PST)
On 18 Nov, 00:37, Judith M Smith <judithmsm...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:54:39 -0800 (PST), thirty-six
>
> <thirty-...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> >On 16 Nov, 18:47, "mileburner" <milebur...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> >> If you glance over your shoulder and assess the size of the vehicle behind
> >> ...
|
Re: More bad news in London
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:40:58 +0000
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:35:08 -0000, "mileburner"
<mileburner@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>"Keitht" <KeithT> wrote in message
>news:KcGdnfr18pB785_WnZ2dnUVZ8sli4p2d@bt.com...
>> mileburner wrote:
>>
>>> Cycling up the inside of traffic (especially HGVs) is dangerous.
>>>
>>> Allowing traffic to overtake where ...
|
Re: More bad news in London
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:37:43 +0000
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:54:39 -0800 (PST), thirty-six
<thirty-six@live.co.uk> wrote:
>On 16 Nov, 18:47, "mileburner" <milebur...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>> If you glance over your shoulder and assess the size of the vehicle behind
>> and then look ahead to see the width of the available space it is quite easy
...
|
|
|
