Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:41:04 +0100
"Rodney Pont" <aspaminy7@infohitsystems.ltd.uk> writes:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:27:40 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
>
>>"Rodney Pont" <aspaminy7@infohitsystems.ltd.uk> writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:29:58 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
>>>
>>>>Oct 23 20:14:56 clueless bgpfeed: xxxxxx@a Route 81.187.19.108/ ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:27:40 +0100
"Rodney Pont" <aspaminy7@infohitsystems.ltd.uk> writes:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:29:58 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
>
>>Oct 23 20:14:56 clueless bgpfeed: xxxxxx@a Route 81.187.19.108/32 now down
>>Oct 23 20:14:56 clueless bgpfeed: xxxxxx@a Route 81.187.19.0/26 now down
>>Oct 23 20:14:56 clueless radius-acct: BBI ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:29:58 +0100
John Weston <invalid@earlsway.invalid> writes:
> In article <87tyxpm69o.fsf@devereux.me.uk>, "John Devereux" wrote:
>>
>> Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> writes:
>>
>> > On 23 Oct 2009, John Devereux stated:
>> >> Well, right on schedule, it has gone off at 20:15 (Friday). And stayed
>> >> off.
>> >
>> ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:32:35 +0100
Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> writes:
> On 23 Oct 2009, John Devereux stated:
>> Well, right on schedule, it has gone off at 20:15 (Friday). And stayed
>> off.
>
> 20:15? That's interesting. It went off for a hunk around 19:30 for me,
> but came back *on* at 20:11.
>
>> But since the usual suggestion is ...
|
P660HW funny
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:18:41 +0000 (UTC)
I run a web server on one of my fixed IPs.
If I connect my laptop firefox can get pages from the server using
it's *external* address. However, if I use a WIFI connection for the
laptop it can't. I can ping it though. Nothing I could see in the
firewall log - and I log all drops.
--
Regards
Dave Savill ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:08:46 +0100
John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> writes:
> RevK <noreply@blogger.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> Most people for most of this incident have been on-line. 21CN customers
>> had outage of a few minutes, and 20CN customers much longer as it takes
>> a while to get stuck sessions cleared on BT.
>
> ...
|
[Status] [Update #3] [closed] 21CN-BRAS-RED2-GW-TH
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:14:08 +0100
Posted at 2009-10-22 17:17 BST by RevK
Update #3: 2009-10-22 21:14 BST
Another BT 21CN BRAS flapping.
Chasing BT now.
Like I say, "industry standard" is way too low a target for our own
equipment!
| Update: Fixed quite quickly this time.
>
> Alsojust after 8pm - now fixed.[IMAGE]
URL: htt ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:08:17 +0100
David Lord <snews@lordynet.org> writes:
> John Devereux wrote:
>> "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:10:50 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have had this for months now, with these problems for many or
>>>> most weekends and many evenings. I am getti ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:32:49 +0100
"Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> writes:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:10:50 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
>
>> We have had this for months now, with these problems for many or most
>> weekends and many evenings. I am getting a lot of pressure to change
>> providers, I think one more "weekend" blip ...
|
Re: [Status] [Update #6] [closed] 22:58 LNS restart
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:10:50 +0100
RevK <noreply@blogger.com> writes:
[...]
>
> Most people for most of this incident have been on-line. 21CN customers
> had outage of a few minutes, and 20CN customers much longer as it takes
> a while to get stuck sessions cleared on BT.
This sort of thing can have a devastating impact. It seems ...
|
