Re: To celebrate the new group
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:42:31 -0500
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:18:03 +0000, Tom Crispin <urcm@britsc.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:16:02 +0000, Peter Clinch
><p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> [newsgroup line changed to unnm]
>
>>Deary me Tom, you seem to be suffering a bit from paranoia...
>
> Paranoia? No. The implementation of a pass-l ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:18:03 +0000
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:16:02 +0000, Peter Clinch
<p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
[newsgroup line changed to unnm]
>Deary me Tom, you seem to be suffering a bit from paranoia...
Paranoia? No. The implementation of a pass-list and watch-list is
enirely defensible. Concealing its implementation, or attempt ...
|
Again?
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:47:55 +0000
My last post got binned for being xposted.
URC is still full of crap, this place doesn't seem to want to discuss
some subjects and others can only be discussed as far as a moderators
last word. I'm off from both and it's possible that Tom's scenario of
both grousp failing might be forthcoming. For those sit ...
|
Re: Goodbye uk.rec.cycling; Helllo U.R.C.moderated
25 Oct 2009 18:43:24 GMT
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:45:22 +0000, Marc wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote:
>> This discussion is off topic in this group, and is also off-topic in
>> u.r.c.m.
>
> There seem to be a considerable no of topics that are deemed "off
> -topic" in uk.rec.cycling.moderated. Any chance of them being listed?
Read the ch ...
|
Post rejection on urcm
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:22:11 +0000
[Please leave urc in the newsgroup line in any reply as I do no
subscribe to unnm]
Background:
There was a discussion in urcm about why some posts were approved in
seconds and others took several hours to be passed.
Peter Clinch replied giving two possible explainations:
Message-ID: <7kim6pF3a8199U1@mid. ...
|
Re: Goodbye uk.rec.cycling; Helllo U.R.C.moderated
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:41:23 GMT
Simon Brooke wrote on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:03:55 +0000:
> If you use a valid From: address for your test post, you will get a
> polite email from the mod bot.
Does that work for "Reply-To:"?
--
Regards
Alex
http://www.badphorm.co.uk/ ...
|
ulm modbot stopped?
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:28:15 +0000
I haven't posted anything recently but it doesn't look as though
anything has happened since 2009.10.24 15:00:16
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days ...
|
Re: ulm Rejection 80815
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:06:29 +0100
In message <7kh71jF38t3mqU1@mid.individual.net>, Steve Walker
<spam-trap@beeb.net> writes
>Please stop arsing about now Judith,
It's a pity this isn't a "binaries" newsgroup, or we might see how
callipygian she is when she's arsing about.
--
< Paul > ...
|
ulm : Guideline Changes
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:22:03 +0100
I notice that the Todal has issued "Moderation Charter and
Guidelines: an occasional reminder" in uk.legal.moderated - which is a
sensible thing to do as things do change,
But - I understand that the guidelines have actually changed over the
last couple of days. When such changes are made could I suggest a
...
|
Re: ulm Rejection 80815
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-10-23, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> This post appears in the history of having been rejected today
> 2009.10.23 15:00:23 80815
>
> It does not appear in the list of rejected posts and the reason given.
That's what always happens, until the rejected post is released into
the reject pile. Pos ...
|
