|
|
|
Re: Appeal of rejected post to uk.rec.cycling.moderated
26 Oct 2009 19:43:08 GMT
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:37:19 +0000, Tom Crispin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:35:07 +0000, Pedt <"\"@
> @\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>You appear to be suggesting that urcm operates on a) You're on the
>>auto/pass list and your post goes through on the nod (unless you hit a
>>trigger word perhaps, ...
|
Re: Appeal of rejected post to uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:37:19 +0000
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:35:07 +0000, Pedt <"\"@
@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote:
>You appear to be suggesting that urcm operates on
>a) You're on the auto/pass list and your post goes through on the nod
>(unless you hit a trigger word perhaps, it's not been mentioned about
>triggers);
>b) if you are not i ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
26 Oct 2009 17:46:04 GMT
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:43:22 +0000, Matt B wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:09:05 +0000, Matt B wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Clinch wrote:
>>>> However, a place on a pass list is
>>>> earned, so is that such a bad thing?
>>> What are the (actual) required qualifications?
>>
>> The actual requ ...
|
Re: Appeal of rejected post to uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:18:23 +0000
On 26 Oct 2009 08:11:31 GMT, Simon Brooke
<stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:14:59 +0000, Tom Crispin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:17:13 -0000, "Clive George"
>> <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>"Tom Crispin" <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in message
>> ...
|
YOU GO TO HIGH LEVEL
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.123maza.com/domain-web-design/entertainment/ ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
26 Oct 2009 15:26:55 GMT
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:30:18 +0000, Tom Crispin wrote:
> On 26 Oct 2009 13:37:04 GMT, Simon Brooke <stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I am opposed to providing any details of who may be on the blacklist. If
>>we do that it will just provide the usual suspects with something more
>>to bicker about. Th ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
26 Oct 2009 13:37:04 GMT
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:29:10 +0000, Tom Crispin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:11:55 -0500, Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com>
> wrote:
>
>>There currently isn't anyone on the
>>block-list does that mean as soon as we put someone on that it magically
>>becomes "implemented" and we should tell everyone?
> ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
26 Oct 2009 13:19:54 GMT
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:09:05 +0000, Matt B wrote:
> Peter Clinch wrote:
>> However, a place on a pass list is
>> earned, so is that such a bad thing?
>
> What are the (actual) required qualifications?
The actual required qualification is that you don't troll, you don't get
into needless disputes, and you ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
26 Oct 2009 13:15:56 GMT
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:55:24 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:
> On 26/10/09 11:42, Andy Leighton wrote:
>
>> I honestly don't understand why you are so het up about this. The only
>> possible ramifications are that some people get their posts
>> auto-approved (so they hit the group more quickly*)
>
> By the time a ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:11:55 -0500
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:56:44 +0000,
Tom Crispin <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:42:31 -0500, Andy Leighton
><andyl@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
> The various reasons given for the posts rejection fail to convince me
> otherwise:
>
> #1 Everyone knows we are operating a ...
|
|
|
