|
|
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:56:55 +0000
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:55:34 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
<guy.chapman@spamcop.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:24:55 +0000 (UTC), Percy Picacity
><key@under.the.invalid> wrote:
>
>>OK, the argument applies almost equally to both of you, though jms has
>>more intense and unremitting nastiness as her st ...
|
Re: Appeal of rejected post to uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:05:26 -0500
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:43:28 +0000, smr <stevie.rice@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Danny Colyer wrote:
>> On 26/10/2009 19:51, Tom Crispin asked:
>>> How does the watch-list work?
>>
>> A moderator observes a pattern in the posts made by a particular poster
>> that suggest that this poster is likely to cause problem ...
|
Re: weird or what, take a look at this
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:09 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <6dkhe5t4lgdsr7o2ks8bthcg9albcb0nhk@4ax.com>,
moderation2009@live.co.uk (jms) wrote:
> Cummins returns to the group after a period of mental illness and
> you
> think something like that is funny do you?
Actually, if you were aware of my previous history - of which I have no
shame, merely regret ...
|
Re: the other place
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:41:06 +0000
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:38:39 -0000, "Clive George"
<clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>"Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chapman@spancop.net> wrote in message
>news:MPG.2552d05d3b13eed298968d@news.zen.co.uk...
>
>> Are you going to make it your personal mission to reply to every single
>> one of the many posts cr ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:39:36 +0000
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:32:39
<JvqdnQBAc7i1LXvXnZ2dnUVZ8uGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
uk.net.news.moderation Andy Burns <usenet.aug2009@adslpipe.co.uk>
>At the moment it's not a problem for me either, I don't subscribe to
>non-moderated groups, and the only moderated lists I use are
>announce-only lists.
>
>But I ...
|
Re: weird or what, take a look at this
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:26 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <YO6dnU7mbfCa0nXXnZ2dnUVZ8l-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk (Clive George) wrote:
> Are you sure about that? Really, completely, 100% sure? Do you run
> your own mail system? I hear Paul Cummins is a good man to ask for
> help :-)
No, I;d charge them a *huge* IDLY surcharge.., ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:26 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <hc9mk1$i6o$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
sunnybard@txinfo.org (Sunny Bard) wrote:
> Ahh! well spotted, what I meant to write was "I only subscribe to
> non-moderated groups".
:-D
That works for me, sir.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
...
|
What is the URCM moderators' definition of "needlessly inflammatory"
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:50:46 +0000
The reason I ask is that it is not apparent from the empirical evidence.
- This post[1] got rejected as "needlessly inflammatory"!
- This post[2] got rejected as "needlessly inflammatory"!
- This post[3] got rejected as "needlessly inflammatory"!
- This needlessly inflammatory post[4] (Message-ID:
<mf6ge5l65g3 ...
|
Do URCM moderators respond to emails?
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:15:45 +0000
I wondered what the policy of the URCM moderators was wrt to emails sent
to the "urcm-moderators@..." address, as recommended for queries on some
of the rejection emails sent out.
The reason that I ask is that I have sent three queries to that address
since Monday, but had no response at all - to any of them, ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:22:22 +0000
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:24 +0000, Tom Crispin
<kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>>you're not seriously saying you're still
>>unaware of the /platinum/ list?
>
>ITYM the titanium list. Or is it the arborium list?
For jms, the Brahms and Liszt.
--
Geoff Berrow (Put thecat out to email)
It' ...
|
|
|
