Re: To celebrate the new group
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:28:39 +0000
Matt B <matt.bourke@nospam.london.com> writes:
> I have views and opinions which ...
in many cases and in some situations would be shared by a substantial
number of urc (and, I expect, urcm) posters, but your pointless
pedantry, your continual attempts to work every thread around to
discussion of them and you ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:07:51 +0000
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:06:33 <7n2fe59ohfcr9c58sd4jm0fvu89cqapj0a@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.moderation "Just zis Guy, you know?"
<guy.chapman@spamcop.net>
>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:55:24 +0000, Tom Crispin
><kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>
>>ITYM the titanium list. Or is it the arborium list?
>
>Unob ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:48:07 +0000
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Simon Brooke
<stillyet@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 29 Oct, 15:08, "The Todal" <deadmail...@beeb.net> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe he meant that he could blacklist the troublemakers based on the first
>> few posts they have made to the moderated group. ?I inferred that in his
>> v ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:35:07 +0000
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:48:37 -0700 (PDT), Simon Brooke
<stillyet@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 29 Oct, 00:54, "Clive George" <cl...@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> If we're talking about Simon here, I strongly believe based on past
>> interaction (several years worth on URC) that power and prestige aren't
>> beh ...
|
Re: A bit harsh?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:34:06 +0000
In message <spjje5l80jd0ifea74q7jg5em48ajqtgeo@4ax.com>, jms
<moderation2009@live.co.uk> writes
>If I had dived in with 85% of cyclists think that they can jump red
>lights - or 90% of cyclists think that riding on a pavement was OK at
>that point - you would have moaned and shouted: - troll.
Aren't you glad ...
|
Re: A bit harsh?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:22:55 +0000
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:10:51 +0000, Peter Clinch
<p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
>The Todal wrote:
>
>> This group seems to have become a massive gripe-fest, and the anger and
>> animosity (to which I may myself have added by one angry post I made
>> yesterday) will probably be counter-productive. A group ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:55:09 +0000
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:21:14 +0000, The Wanderer
<the.wanderer@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
<snip>
>This has lead me to conclude - being educated is not the same thing as
>being intelligent.
Your comments have lead me to believe that you are in fact neither.
--
British Medical Association (BMA)
View on ...
|
Re: weird or what, take a look at this
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:54:43 +0000
In message <memo.20091029020912.2880B@cix.co.uk>, Paul Cummins
<usethebl@stedphone.invalid> writes
>In article <6dkhe5t4lgdsr7o2ks8bthcg9albcb0nhk@4ax.com>,
>moderation2009@live.co.uk (jms) wrote:
>
>> Cummins returns to the group after a period of mental illness and
>> you
>> think something like that is funn ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:55:09 +0000
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:54:43 -0000, "Clive George"
<clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
<snip>
>If we're talking about Simon here, I strongly believe based on past
>interaction (several years worth on URC) that power and prestige aren't
>behind why he's doing this. Being pissed off at the state of URC caused ...
|
URCM - how to get it?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:54:14 +0000
Is there a list of the NNTP servers that actually carry this newsgroup.
Being on a Tiscalli/Giganews NNTP server I don't see it.
R.
...
|
