Re: Newsgroup Deletion
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:31:05 -0500
On 1982-12-06, Clayton Elwell <utzoo!decvax!cwruecmp!ccc> wrote:
> As has been mentioned before, this would require someone to
> volunteer as moderator, which could get to be time-consuming.
> I wonder if automatic moderation is possible (preferably at a
> "large" site such as decvax or ucbvax)...
How about Vir ...
|
Re: I am here :)
19 Jun 2009 13:05:29 GMT
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:00:30 +0000, agnon wrote:
> Virgin recnetly changed their provider, and the new people have the
> moderation flag set wrong. or soemthing.
For values of 'recently' commonly used by geologists: it's been going on
for ages in geek-time.
--
John Stumbles
What do you mean, talking ...
|
Apology to the uk.legal.moderated moderators
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:24:01 +0100
I'd like to apologize for the strange duplicate posts that have been
appearing recently because of a misconfiguration (mine), as well as
for mistyping my own e-mail address when I changed it recently.
Both PEBCAKs. ...
|
Re: I am here :)
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:00:30 GMT
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:38:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Also, a lot of postings do not even seem to be reaching
> moderation.org.uk.
> Ian.
Virgin recnetly changed their provider, and the new people have the
moderation flag set wrong. or soemthing. ...
|
Don't defame the dead!
Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:08:15 +0100
http://www.moderation.org.uk/3display_post.php?pst_id=69726&returnto=3displayulm.php
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/01/04/evesham_technology_liquidated/
Tony ...
|
Potentially defamatory thread in ulm
Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
There is a thread in ulm at the moment about the management of a named
charity, alleging failure of the trustees to act properly. Do the
moderators not feel that this is inappropriate?
--
Percy Picacity ...
|
Missing Reject
Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:03:57 +0100
Is there a reason why rejected ulm submission with Post ID 69694 is not
available on http://www.moderation.org.uk?
Tony ...
|
uk.l.m: Can someone tell me what I shouldn't have said?
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:21:18 +0100
because of the circumstances I will attempt to post again
http://moderation.org.uk/3display_post.php?pst_id=69442&returnto=3display
ulm.php
I just can't work out which the bad bit was
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days ...
|
Partiality affecting moderation in uklm?
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:36:40 +0100
I've had two posts rejected in uklm. They are IMHO not hurtful or abusive.
I also think they are germane to the discussion, particularly because one
of them was a reply to a message posted by one of the moderators.
They are distinctly at odds with the view of one of the moderators who has
participated in the dis ...
|
legalbanter vs uk.legal.moderated
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:27:24 +0100
late last month some posts were made in a thread in uk.legal.moderated
that didn't appear to be seen by someone posting via legalbanter
today I had a look at the thread in legalbanter because it seemed
"something" was missing from the discussion
some posts that were made in legalbanter have not been seen i ...
|
