Re: ulm Rejection 80815
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
jms,
I think you got the wrong u.n.n.m - I assume you meant
uk.net.news.moderation? Followups set, moderation query quoted below.
Trollsworth
On Oct 23, 5:25?pm, jms <moderation2...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> This post appears in the history of having been rejected today
> 2009.10.23 15:00:23 ? ? 80815
>
> It do ...
|
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderation
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:26:15 +0100
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:36:45 +0100, Mark Goodge
<usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>>Then why did it start silently discarding emails from my server
>>which was not listed anywhere AFAIK and had sent hotmail about 100
>>messages over five years, none of which were spam? When I
>>complained they invit ...
|
uk.rec.cycling.moderated rejected messages
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:32:20 +0000 (UTC)
Is it possible to view anywhere the rejected messages and the reasons for
them being rejected for the new moderated cycling newsgroup?
The reason I would like to see which articles have been rejected is to help
me to be able to judge if the moderators are acting fairly.
Thanks to anyone who can point me in t ...
|
weird or what, take a look at this
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:26:00 +0100
I can't see urcm lasting long if this is typical. You can see what I
said at the very bottom.
===
Your message has been rejected because it was rude, a flame, and/or
personal abuse.
Please refer to the group charter and moderation policy at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/urcm/
and direct your queries ...
|
Re: ulm Pedant of the week?
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:50:41 +0100
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:10:08 +0100, smr <stevie.rice@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>jms wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:51:14 +0100, smr <stevie.rice@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Judith M Smith wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:55:52 +0100, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 15 ...
|
Re: ulm Pedant of the week?
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:45:57 +0100
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:10:08 +0100, smr <stevie.rice@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Ah, I'd been following the other line of the thread, apologies. Yeah,
> you really can't be too restrictive about what data can consist of,
> recorded measurements are a type of data rather than data is recorded
> measurements.
To s ...
|
uk.rec.cycling.moderation
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:10:49 +0100
I see on the URCM webpage that the address for contacting the
moderators is given as urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk.
I understand that this address will not work from some popular email
systems - and that there are two alternative addresses which are
supposed to work irrespective of originating emai ...
|
ulm Pedant of the week?
Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.moderation.org.uk/3display_post.php?pst_id=80151
Post Id:80151
Reject reason given -->
This post has insufficient new material. Similar data have already
been posted.
===================================================
Does he also avoid the cracks in the pavement? ...
|
Re: uklm moderator lack of impartiality
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:34:31 +0100
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:07:55 +0100, "Paul C. Dickie"
<pcd@bozzie.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <RrWdnV1LUtrbPVLXnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d@bt.com>, smr
><stevie.rice@googlemail.com> writes
>>Adam Funk wrote:
>>> On 2009-10-09, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>>> So it doesn't affect the newsgroup directly, it just means that the ...
|
Contact ulm Moderators
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:16:04 +0100
<the_todal(at)msn(dot)com> bounced.
Is there an alternative please for The Todal
...
|
