Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
net
net
news.announce
news.config
news.management
news.moderation
providers
providers.aaisp
web.authoring
  
 
group : uk.net.news.management      view archive
page nr.   1      2      3      4      5      6      7      8      9      10      11      12      13      14      15      16      17      18      19      20    next >>



Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Mon, 2 Nov 2009 00:59 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <8p4se51jqke7oqv5slrgtobhjcmeh698cp@4ax.com>, dg@dickgaughan.co.uk (Dick Gaughan) wrote: > [1] chastised - insulted, flamed, branded a clueless fuckwit etc Oi! I resemble that remark. -- Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead Wasting Bandwidth since 1981 ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:38:41 +0000
In <ekvre597qf0uh8ve7ehm1cqitdlbg5om9k@4ax.com> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:34:09 +0000, Mike Fleming <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> wrote: >In article <odfpe5tu5pvvc8jhnql1u1chlun8q1sc39@4ax.com>, Dick Gaughan ><dg@dickgaughan.co.uk> writes: > >> Nah, with all respect to your good self and the noble departed, >> that was ...

Re: Low Volume Groups     Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:46 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <Xns9CB6D9E5E15A4grahamdrabblelineone@drabble.me.uk>, usenet05@drabble.me.uk (Graham Drabble) wrote: > *From:* Graham Drabble <usenet05@drabble.me.uk> > *Date:* Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:25:12 +0100 > > On 13 Sep 2009 Graham Drabble <usenet05@drabble.me.uk> wrote in > news:Xns9C85AB3F2D322grahamdrabbleli ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:20:05 +0000
In message <arbre51g7ikooligvtte1igomf8evi0h92@4ax.com>, Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote: >"Where 90 days have elapsed since the publication of the first RFD, >the committee may direct that no further RFDs shall be published, but >that the proposal shall either proceed to a vote within 40 day ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:08:35 +0000
In message <bpmre55i4rlu6s6go87n6p24r91ge9akot@4ax.com>, Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote: >I am still interested in what can be done to tighten up the >guidelines, and I do think there is a case for tidying up the uk.* >hierarchy, having come across both those issues as a result of coming >h ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:13:49 +0000
In message <bc5re5dnqgqobj8pe8smjfl0ibd459e9d0@4ax.com>, Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote: >>>Is the committe not already telling users what they ought to do with >>>reference to group creation? >It is clear that the committee can, for example, refuse or allow >objections to fast track RFDs ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:06:36 +0000
In message <ft1re5t75vinm74plf1ieq45vk6ppf2e5m@4ax.com>, Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote: >Secondly, there are several clauses that indicate that decisions are >made on the basis of committee opinion e.g. > >'In the event of 6 or more objections, or any objection which seems to >the Commit ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Sun, 1 Nov 2009 19:45:43 +0000
At 19:16:33 on Sun, 1 Nov 2009, Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote in <bpmre55i4rlu6s6go87n6p24r91ge9akot@4ax.com>: >I am now also suspecting that this suspicion is common amongst people >who have responded to me in these discussions, which might explain some >of the extremely unproductive ...

Lament ...     Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:45:06 +0000
I wish it was Apr 1st, because there are so many RFD's I'd like to propose right now. Can the committee please engage their power and make it so, thanks. (Also, I hate Christmas[1] so skipping that would be cool, although I quite like Guy Fawkes Night so maybe you could have that moved to say, Apr 2nd?) [1] ...

Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)     Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:54:03 +0000
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:10:59 +0000, John Hall <nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> wrote: >Those of us who watched the TV series "The IT Crowd" know that that is >quite wrong, and that in fact all the information is held within a >single box. Please don't drop that box, at least until after the election. ...


page nr.: page nr.   1      2      3      4      5      6      7      8      9      10      11      12      13      14      15      16      17      18      19      20    next >>
Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us