Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
03 Nov 2009 11:30:55 +0000 (GMT)
In article <7la9elF3c5rd2U1@mid.individual.net>,
kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>If foo is a hotmail user with little knowledge of all this - rather like
>me - and gets this message, will they understand it? [...]
If Control published the correct contact addresses they wouldn't need
to understand it, beyo ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
03 Nov 2009 11:12:13 +0000 (GMT)
In article <3rsve5dutuhr70627t5dm6l7ohgkpafd4o@4ax.com>,
.m <nospam@notnominet.name> wrote:
>And FWIW, my personal feeling is that NTs may simply be on the very
>extreme end (so called 'High functioning') of a very broad and complex
>spectrum. This is a more inclusive philosophy and intended to make
>understand ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:33:40 +0000
In article <1j8lndj.60r5bli09g1bN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
Sn!pe <snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> writes:
>I have a stable of eleven good, free, text newsservers, collected over
>the years. Of those at least half offer a perceived service every bit as
>good as e.g. NIN; several run Cleanfeed. Nobody need pay for te ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:30:51 +0000
In article <hcno63$kb6$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid> writes:
>{R}'s usenet persona could be embarrassing, rude and upsetting, but dealing
>with him on a professional level meant I got to see a different side, and
>it really drilled home that usenet is as much about avatars as any on ...
|
Re: Low Volume Groups
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:17:38 +0000
In message <memo.20091101234624.3280D@cix.co.uk>, Paul Cummins
<usethebl@stedphone.invalid> writes
>I think the current-events.ni can just be removed, in the same way it was
>created?
Explosively?
--
< Paul > ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:05:38 +0000
In message <VwlsEvF8Rh7KFw6N@romana.davros.org>, Clive D. W. Feather
<clive@davros.org> wrote:
>Correct. Fast-track is supposed to only be for uncontentious matters.
>If six people think that fast-track is wrong, it's contentious by
>definition. If one person has a valid objection, it's contentious by
>decisi ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
02 Nov 2009 21:00:07 +0000 (GMT)
In article <Xns9CB77FF8C238Dperspicacity@208.90.168.18>,
Percy Picacity <key@under.the.invalid> wrote:
>Cris Galletly <galletly@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in
>news:Sbj*cq7Us@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk:
>> I will admit to being on the autism spectrum, however. And it
>> seems to come out far more online tha ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
02 Nov 2009 20:52:14 +0000 (GMT)
In article <n9cue5hu8tlialok9kthkii4m01csk4l1v@4ax.com>,
Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote:
>What is a neurotypical? Sorry, 'Neurotypical'? Do tell.
A person not (generally thought to be) on the autistic spectrum.
--
+ Cris Galletly <galletly@chiark.greenend.org.uk> + ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:50:50 +0000
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:44:57 +0000, %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
wrote:
>John Hall <nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Those of us who watched the TV series "The IT Crowd" know that that is
>> quite wrong, and that in fact all the information is held within a
>> single box.
>
>Fortunately compression ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:03:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cherry Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:14:20 +0000 (UTC), Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>And my last comment, if the hackers who read this group wanted
>>to, they could develop a good, working java based newsreader that
>>could be driven via a web interface
> ...
|
