|
|
|
Re: Formal Complaint uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:12:39 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:05:03 +0000, Geoff
Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:26:19 -0000, "Trevor A Panther"
> <tapan@PSANTISPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>And now they want to take over the usenet committee!
>
> Well it does seem that way.
>
> Do they re ...
|
Re: Formal Complaint uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:43:13 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 08:43:57 +0000 (UTC), Mr.
Benn <%%@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk> wrote in news:7llr1cF3crme8U3
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> Tom Crispin wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the system became clear several days ago, but it took some
>>> considerabl ...
|
Re: Formal Complaint uk.rec.cycling.moderated
10 Nov 2009 19:01:30 +0000 (GMT)
In article <y6OdneRDLfKDO2TXnZ2dnUVZ8iidnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
Clive George <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>Blocked = blacklisted. You really think that's a "one false move" thing?
I can assure everyone that it's not. We've had some discussions about
what the level of problem has to be before someone might ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:17:03 +0000
At 16:35:11 on Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Pedt <"\"@
@\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote in
<JjIDZeO$YZ+KFwxu@fishcake.eternal-september.org>:
>In message <7ltefkF3a8p74U1@mid.individual.net>, at 15:16:57 on Tue, 10
>Nov 2009, kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wibbled
>>Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> said:
...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:35:11 +0000
In message <7ltefkF3a8p74U1@mid.individual.net>, at 15:16:57 on Tue, 10
Nov 2009, kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wibbled
>Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> said:
>> Control blocked it and the Committee collectively failed to overturn
>> that decision, as was your collective responsibility to do.
>
>It ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:34:51 +0000
In message <Ozg*e8LVs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, at 14:43:28 on Tue,
10 Nov 2009, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wibbled
>In article <p161f5dvvqqedtd0ipgq6thpkrp1c8dh4t@news.markshouse.net>,
>Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>>On 03 Nov 2009 18:35:44 +0000 (GMT), Ian Jackso ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:28:23 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:50:26 -0000, kat
<kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid> said:
>
>> Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:22:54 +0000, Mark Goodge
>>> <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The committee interp ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:50:01 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:14:55 -0000, Alan
LeHun <try@reply.to> wrote:
> In article <slrnhf6ht7.bm7.pjr@pjr.gotdns.org>,
> pjr@example.invalid says...
>
>> (propounded by at least one Chiarkista)
>>
>
> After the success of his introduction of "Chiarkian" into the
> groups lexicon, ...
|
Re: On moderated newsgroups
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:38:34 +0000
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:25:53 +0000
.m <nospam@notnominet.name> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:51:43 +0000, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Eh? Some email correspondence relevant to the vote wasn't available
> >to the replacement vote taker.
>
> This didn't delay the result once Jon took ove ...
|
Re: On moderated newsgroups
Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:25:53 +0000
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:51:43 +0000, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>Eh? Some email correspondence relevant to the vote wasn't available to
>the replacement vote taker.
This didn't delay the result once Jon took over, though.
...
|
|
|
