Re: Hustings question
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:53 +0100 (BST)
In article <bpk5e5tc36jc0tk3intub60kujbvuciond@4ax.com>,
moderation2009@live.co.uk (jms) wrote:
> Perhaps from Clare Boothby or Eleanor Blair - two random people who
> supported the nominations?
I know a Clare Boothby in Cambridge - I wonder if it's the same one?
Shall I call her and see if she nows she's no ...
|
Hustings question
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:31:38 +0100
Specifically for the four folk who appear to know each other quite well and
how nominated each other (i.e. Ian, David, Matthew and Jonathan).
Assuming 1-3 of you get voted onto the committee, do you intend to share or
discuss the content of committee mailing list or discussions with the 1(to
3) of you who don't ...
|
/sigh
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:22:20 +0100
They couldn't even be bothered to get a broad range of nominators.
--
Tony Evans
Saving trees and wasting electrons since 1993
blog -> http://perceptionistruth.com/
olmr -> http://www.onelinemoviereviews.co.uk/
[ anything below this line wasn't written by me ] ...
|
Re: Question for candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:46:18 +0100
In message <7kelq9F39n4u9U1@mid.individual.net>, at 22:33:42 on Fri, 23
Oct 2009, kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wibbled
>
>You clearly weren't here when the sausage group rushed through!
>
IRTA 'when the sausage dog rushed through'.
--
Pedt ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:29:44 +0100
In message <bhy*4ghUs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Ian Jackson
<ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>(Don't say it was clear that the Committee wouldn't have obstructed.
>Geoff Berrow has said here in public that he thinks the Committee
>might have insisted on another RFD, which in my view would have been
> ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:28:08 +0100
In message <memo.20091020225524.2664H@cix.co.uk>, Paul Cummins
<paulcummins@cix.co.uk> wrote:
>I sought election onto the committee not to have any power, since there
>was none, but because I was firmly of the view that it is better to have
>someone like me inside the tent pissing out, rather than outside, pissin ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:14:43 +0100
In message <LXn*aT3Ts@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Ian Jackson
<ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>But that's not the only problem. For example, the failure to post my
>first draft of the first RFD was entirely unjustified and contrary to
>the Guidelines.
I don't recall the Committee reaching any decis ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:11:05 +0100
In message <7k7cmnF389nq9U1@mid.individual.net>, Barry Salter
<salterg@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In fact, taking it further, I'd say that binaries are best located on a
>web or FTP server,
Possibly.
>as SMTP and NNTP are woefully inefficient methods of transferring them
>due to the overheads incurred by ...
|
Re: The University of Cambridge and urcm
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:00 +0100 (BST)
In article <9344e5l89b89tr5tfsdgcblou7eoafd5kr@4ax.com>,
judithmsmith@live.co.uk (Judith M Smith) wrote:
> This PP is a forgery - it is not from me.
Based on her posting history, I concur.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:27 +0100 (BST)
In article <Tsw*MnhUs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>,
ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Ian Jackson) wrote:
> However when committee members post their views they shouldn't claim
> that their opinions carry no more weight than anyone else's. They
They don't as a rule. It's the non-committee folk who do that, due ...
|
