|
|
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:56:21 +0100
In uk.net.news.config on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:39:18 +0100, jms
<moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:14:26 +0100, Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>>Don't the rules say "The committee shall promptly obey all
>>instructions given by anonymous cowards"?
>
> I ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:09:09 +0100
In message <7ddkheF2ai0s8U1@mid.individual.net>, at 14:12:08 on Thu, 30
Jul 2009, kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wibbled
[unnm and urc dropped from followup]
>
>Molly Mockford said:
>> At 14:04:51 on Thu, 30 Jul 2009, kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote in
>> <7ddk3pF27sik6U1@mid.individual.net>:
>>
>>> It's Wml ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:01:07 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In message <ssd375h5hd22s99n1k69a91ulp4siheh7u@4ax.com>, Mark
<i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> writes
>On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:11:08 +0100, "Wm..."
><tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:48:19 <a29375lo1tdjlou9emv0j3rd0ek2qr3ccc@4 ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:13:41 -0500
On 30 Jul 2009 18:49:41 +0100 (BST),
David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk>:
>>Indeed. IMV the group would probably have succeeded with a fast track
>>so I wouldn't have a hard job making a decision.
>
> Six objections? I count Ian ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:42:36 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:06:58 +0100,
kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> Tim Woodall said:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:18:01 +0100,
>> kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Simon Brooke said:
>>>> On 30 July, 16:41, "kat" <kat.n...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>> Wm... said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are any bicy ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:30:31 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:06:58 <7de29pF2abjm6U1@mid.individual.net>
uk.net.news.management kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com>
>That's a pity.:-)
Your e-mail address isn't working kat :(
I think you might have set it a little bit tight such that well wishers
can't get through to you.
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address v ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:47:14 -0500
On 2009-07-30, Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> wrote:
> No. It's still less than 5 days. I received the ballot "paper"
> without a few hours so I was expecting an acknowledgement in the same
> order of time. Perhaps my expectations are unreasonable, but I am not
> familiar with how the votes are count ...
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:35:49 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:30:02 <6676ab1fdd43b7c2b47a57c3bef432df@dizum.com>
uk.net.news.config Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
>Anthony R. Gold wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:39:18 +0100, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > I have put together the "press release" - please have a look and see
>> > i ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 30, 5:18?pm, "kat" <kat.n...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > That's a shame. I feel certain that you'd look sweet upon the seat of
> > a bicycle built for two.
> Maybe, but not in the outft I have for tomorrow!
You could go for a Dutch bike, assuming the outfit is suitably
modest :-)
- -
Guy ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 30, 5:03?pm, "Wm..." <tcn...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk>
wrote:
> >My kid sister is getting married later this year, I am standing in for
> >the late pater. ?Fancy dress will be worn, much to the disgust of
> >elder son (15). ?Maroon cravats. ?Oh dear.
> That could be a younger persons way of saying " ...
|
|
|
