|
|
|
Yet another hightower
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.cricinfo.com/countycricket2009/content/current/player/17987.html
http://www.cricinfo.com/countycricket2009/engine/current/match/382979.html
Useful 4-fer for the 6ft 4 bowler Andrew Miller at Warks.
Richard ...
|
Re: What chance of a win for England ?
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 24, 9:00?pm, (max.it) wrote:
> .
> Forget about the pitch, assume good consistant conditions, would you
> like to bat first or second against Sri Lanka?
>
> max.it
We should bat first so the lads can get away early to the bar.
Mike Gooding
------------------- ...
|
Re: Jessop
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:58:51 +0100
In article <vJtqsnJ3WFvKFw+W@anywhere.demon.co.uk>,
Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> writes:
>In message <aQh1vsCdj6uKFwh7@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>, John Hall
><nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> writes
>>>
>>>
>>>... And Lohmann, .Brockwell, Wood... RH
>>
>>I think this was slightly after Lohmann's ti ...
|
Re: Jessop
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:31:35 +0100
In message <aQh1vsCdj6uKFwh7@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>, John Hall
<nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> writes
>>
>>
>>... And Lohmann, .Brockwell, Wood... RH
>
>I think this was slightly after Lohmann's time.
Last played in 1896... RH
--
Robert Henderson
Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/ blairsca ...
|
Re: What chance of a win for England ?
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:45:45 GMT
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:28:16 +0100, John Hall
<nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <4abbceb3.46729187@news.btinternet.com>,
> ?@?.?.invalid writes:
>>
>>.
>>Forget about the pitch, assume good consistant conditions, would you
>>like to bat first or second against Sri Lanka?
>
>I think England's onl ...
|
Re: Jessop
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:07:27 +0100
In article <ErcA0jV38guKFwgi@anywhere.demon.co.uk>,
Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> writes:
>In message <U$b3uJDPyeuKFwDW@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>, John Hall
><nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> writes
>>
>>I couldn't tell how many players were amateurs without a lot more work
>>(one of the few things t ...
|
Re: Jessop
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:07:05 +0100
In message <wUnum.309947$156.94679@newsfe14.ams2>, Andy Walker
<news@cuboid.co.uk> writes
>Robert Henderson wrote:
>> Jackson is an interesting example because he rarely played a full
>>season. RH
>
> Excluding 1900-01, when he was [as you say] involved with the
>Boer War and played only one match [GvP ...
|
Re: Jessop
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:06:15 +0100
In message <U$b3uJDPyeuKFwDW@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>, John Hall
<nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> writes
>
>I couldn't tell how many players were amateurs without a lot more work
>(one of the few things that annoys me about CricketArchive is that it
>doesn't distinguish between amateurs and professionals). However ...
|
Re: Jessop
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:38:23 +0100
In article <J4Fzg5tQ3NuKFwQj@anywhere.demon.co.uk>,
Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> writes:
>In message <2gSEXgCQrJuKFwW+@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>, John Hall
><nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> writes
>>>These counties were constantly in financial difficulty and welcomed
>>>the chance to reduce costs by ...
|
Re: Jessop
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:42:23 +0100
In message <O%dum.73641$7B.24631@newsfe28.ams2>, Andy Walker
<news@cuboid.co.uk> writes
>> As I'd already looked
>> at 1900 [random selection], here are the top twenty amateurs:
>> Jackson, Ranji, Webbe, Fry, Mason, Wynyard, Foster, Dillon,
>> Warner, Raikes, Evershed, Grace, Jephson, Knowles, Stoddar ...
|
|
|
