Edward Timpson
Fri, 23 May 2008 18:27:22 +0100
Edward Timpson will no doubt take his seat as the victor in the Crewe and
Nantwich bye-election to cries from the Governmant benches of 'Cobblers!'
Nick Russell
Herefordshire
...
|
Local Authority Byelections 22 May 2008
Fri, 23 May 2008 17:35 +0100 (BST)
ALDC is not aware of any Local Government byelections having taken place
on 22nd May 2008.
Information courtesy of the Association of Liberal Democrat Councillors
www: http://www.aldc.org.
Also available at http://www.gwydir.demon.co.uk/byelections/
--
Cllr. Colin Rosenstiel
Cambridge ...
|
Crewe and Nantwich result
Fri, 23 May 2008 02:34:50 +0100
CREWE and NANTWICH BYELECTION RESULT
Cause: Death of Hon. Mrs. Gwyneth Patricia Dunwoody (Lab) on
17th April 2008
Declared at: 02:25 AM
Returning Officer: Brian Silvester (Mayor of Crewe and Nantwich)
Paul Ancell (Chief Executive) as Acting Returning
...
|
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th May 2008
Fri, 23 May 2008 00:59:08 +0100
On Thu, 22 May 2008 11:10:41 GMT, John M Ward <john@acornusers.org>
wrote:
>In article <ruSdncxwWoZc0KjVRVnyhAA@bt.com>,
> Nick Russell <nicks40@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Emendatus sum
>> >> Nick
>> >
>> > Emendatus sto?
>
>> O tempora, o mores [O Times, O Daily Mirror]
>
>No: that's "O tempora, o mor ...
|
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th May 2008
Wed, 21 May 2008 07:40 +0100 (BST)
In article <69gv02F32u4jnU1@mid.individual.net>,
T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
> Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
>
> >> Epsom and Ewell has preserved a system which was once far more
> >> common, particularly outside urban areas.
>
> > Actually, I think the Epsom and Ewell arrangement wa ...
|
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th May 2008
Tue, 20 May 2008 15:21 +0100 (BST)
In article <alpine.LRH.1.10.0805201004560.1572@frank.dcs.qmul.ac.uk>,
mmh@dcs.qmul.ac.uk (Matthew Huntbach) wrote:
> Epsom and Ewell has preserved a system which was once far more
> common, particularly outside urban areas.
Actually, I think the Epsom and Ewell arrangement was always much rarer
than you impl ...
|
Re: Crewe and Nantwich
Sun, 18 May 2008 16:45:25 -0500
In article <69adscF31lahoU1@mid.individual.net>,
T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
> Nick Russell wrote:
>
> > LD 5929
> > C 14797
> > Lab 7696
>
> So what figures are the Lib Dems using on their dodgey bar charts?
Looking at Elizabeth Shenton's web site there is nothing dodgy ...
|
Crewe and Nantwich
Sun, 18 May 2008 08:50:34 +0100
I'm not sure how the borough boundary compares with the parliamentary
constituency boundary, but according to the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich
website, these are the voting figures for the 2008 borough council elections
(using maximum scores for each major party in each ward):
LD 5929
C 14797
Lab 7696
N ...
|
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th May 2008
Sat, 17 May 2008 08:28:01 GMT
On Fri, 16 May 2008 at 18:21:51, ikr2@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote in
uk.politics.electoral :
>> >
>> On a separate note, I wonder how many 'Independents' have outed
>> themselves as Tories in the last couple of years?
>
>Can't remember which but a Tory on the local elections programme was quite
>open that the de ...
|
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th May 2008
Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:51 -0500
In article <EyhdnfF7VbLIFwQI@blueyonder.co.uk>, pah@invalid.invalid (Paul
Hyett) wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 at 15:07:00, Colin Rosenstiel
> <rosenstiel@cix.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
> >Poole UA, Branksome East
> >Con 923 (55.2;+4.7), LD 750 (44.8;+26.0)
> >[Ind (0.0;-30.7)]
> >Majority 173. ...
|
