|
|
|
Re: Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Thu, 22 May 2008 10:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 12:45 pm, "Aidy" <noem...@noemail.xxx> wrote:
> > I think you missed the point that it is the laws that are unjust and it
> > would be safer to regulate drugs rather than continually make matters
> > worse by prohibiting them.
>
> That's just your opinion. For a start there are the safety issues befor ...
|
Re: Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Thu, 22 May 2008 10:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 12:32 pm, "Aidy" <noem...@noemail.xxx> wrote:
> The other thing people are conveniently forgetting here is that while drug
> taking is, on a certain level, a "victimless crime"
It's good to know you've figured that much out.
> the buying of drugs is
> not. It is the exchange of money that does t ...
|
Re: Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Thu, 22 May 2008 10:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 12:28 pm, "Aidy" <noem...@noemail.xxx> wrote:
> > "Not everyone is persuaded" to obey laws against X is a point in favor
> > of legalizing X that is outweighed by X's being a violation of the
> > rights of others (there's me directly addressing the point of your
> > analogy) ... but while rape and mur ...
|
Re: Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Thu, 22 May 2008 08:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 5:13 am, "Aidy" <noem...@noemail.xxx> wrote:
> > Drugs? I assume you mean; "Drugs currently proscribed as illegal in this
> > country".
>
> Yes, I wasn't aware I had to spell that out, I thought it was rather
> obvious.
>
> > Does that make it right?
>
> I'm not talking about what's "right", but ...
|
Re: Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Thu, 22 May 2008 08:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 5:02 am, "Aidy" <noem...@noemail.xxx> wrote:
> > "Also"? So you concede that it is in fact an argument for legalization
> > and regulation?
>
> Cool, now we're playing semantics. Sure beats tackling the actual arguments
> at hand, especially if you can't.
Straw man. I tackled your actual argument ...
|
Re: Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Wed, 21 May 2008 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
On May 21, 3:40 am, "Aidy" <noem...@noemail.xxx> wrote:
> > So it's not selling drugs that endangers others, it's selling drugs of
> > unknown strength. Which is an argument for legalization and regulation.
>
> Is it not also an argument for
"Also"? So you concede that it is in fact an argument for legalizat ...
|
Drug Czar's plea to downgrade 'E'
Tue, 20 May 2008 09:06:08 +0100
My comment to this article:
When one considers the 114,000 a year killed by tobacco, the 5,000 a year
who die from alcohol overdose and the 120,000 mental health cases a year
also caused by alcohol, LSD and ecstasy seem relatively very safe drugs.
Lorna Spinks died because the tablets she took were far stronge ...
|
Soldiers test positive for drugs
Sat, 17 May 2008 17:11:15 +0100
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/scotland/7406302.stm
"Any soldier found to have taken drugs will be discharged from the
military."
Sounds good.
--
Mark Lewis, North Somerset
...
|
=> U$A turns against CIA created Alliance <= Why the world will NEVER trust the U$A
Sat, 17 May 2008 07:32:17 -0600
BOGOTA, Colombia (CNN) -- The Colombian government sent 14 suspected
paramilitary leaders to the United States on drug charges Tuesday after
authorities said they violated a 2003 deal with the government.
Rodrigo Tovar was one of 14 accused drug traffickers to be extradited Tuesday
morning.
"This mornin ...
|
Re: ACMD: Cannabis 'should remain class C'
Fri, 16 May 2008 19:34:51 +0100
In MsgID<661fijF2hv4dfU1@mid.individual.net> on Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:59:31
+0100, in uk.rec.drugs.cannabis, 'Dr John Watson' wrote:
>That assumes prohibitionists are logical, something I very much doubt. Our
>own Thetan, David Claude Raynes is driven by hatred of stoners, as he
>blames them for his 1999 problems. ...
|
|
|
